Digests
There are 17,104 results on the current subject filter
| Title | IDs & Reference #s ▼ | Background | Primary Holding | Subject Matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Autozentrum Alabang, Inc. vs. Spouses Bernardo (8th June 2016) |
AK257770 G.R. No. 214122 786 Phil. 851 |
Autozentrum Alabang, Inc., an authorized dealer of BMW vehicles, sold a 2008 BMW 320i sports car to Spouses Bernardo in November 2008 for P2,990,000, representing it as a brand new vehicle. Within less than a year, the vehicle experienced multiple mechanical failures including ABS brake system malfunctions, steering column defects, electrical system failures, air conditioning breakdowns, and fuel tank leaks. During repairs conducted by the service center, it was discovered that one of the tires lacked Running Flat Technology (RFT) which should have been standard for all tires, and the Land Transportation Office (LTO) registration revealed that Autozentrum was the previous registered owner o… |
A seller commits a deceptive sales act under Article 50(c) of the Consumer Act of the Philippines when it represents a second-hand or pre-owned vehicle as brand new, new, original, or unused, and such representation may consist not only of words but also of deeds, acts, or silence amounting to suppression of material facts; consequently, the buyer may rescind the contract and demand full refund of the purchase price without deduction for depreciation. |
Undetermined Consumer Law — Deceptive Sales Acts — Representation of Pre-Owned Vehicle as Brand New |
|
Facturan vs. Barcelona, Jr. (8th June 2016) |
AK520657 A.C. No. 11069 |
Complainant Ronaldo C. Facturan filed a complaint for qualified theft against Pilar Mendoza, Jose Sarcon, Elezar Barcelona, Rodrigo Arro, and Joseph Montero before the Provincial Prosecution Office of Alabel, Sarangani Province. The case was docketed as I.S. No. 04-211 and assigned to Prosecutor Faisal D. Amerkhan after respondent Prosecutor Alfredo L. Barcelona, Jr. inhibited himself. The respondents included respondent's cousin Elezar Barcelona and close friends. After conducting a preliminary investigation, Prosecutor Amerkhan forwarded the records to respondent on October 26, 2004, with a resolution recommending prosecution and a corresponding Information, requiring respondent's approva… |
A lawyer in government service who uses his public position to advance or protect the private interests of relatives or close associates by deliberately refusing to act on a criminal complaint and concealing case records violates Rule 6.02, Canon 6 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, notwithstanding that the misconduct occurred in the discharge of official duties as a prosecutor. |
Undetermined Legal Ethics — Violation of Rule 6.02, Canon 6 of the Code of Professional Responsibility — Use of Public Position to Advance Private Interests |
|
First Mega Holdings Corp. vs. Guiguinto Water District (8th June 2016) |
AK184745 G.R. No. 208383 |
First Mega Holdings Corp. (petitioner) owned a gasoline station and commercial complex in Barangay Malis, Guiguinto, Bulacan. To supply water to these facilities, it intended to install a deep well. Guiguinto Water District (respondent) is a government-owned and controlled corporation responsible for water distribution in the municipality. The area of Guiguinto had been identified by the NWRB as one of the critical areas in Metro Manila and adjacent areas suffering from over-extraction of groundwater. |
A government-owned or controlled corporation (GOCC) must secure the prior written conformity and acquiescence of the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC) and the prior written concurrence of the Commission on Audit (COA) before engaging the services of private counsel, and the failure to comply with these requirements renders the representation defective and the proceedings void; however, the existence of an improper protest does not strip the NWRB of its authority to deny a water permit application based on the applicant's violation of the Water Code and operation in a critical area. |
Undetermined Administrative Law — Water Resources — Water Permit Application — Denial Based on Violation of Water Code and Critical Area Status — Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations — Authority to Hire Private Counsel |
|
Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. vs. Sibya (8th June 2016) |
AK659025 G.R. No. 211212 |
Atty. Jesus Sibya, Jr. applied for life insurance with Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. on January 10, 2001. In his application, he disclosed that he had undergone lithotripsy for kidney stones in 1987 at the National Kidney Institute under Dr. Jesus Benjamin Mendoza, but indicated "no recurrence." Sun Life approved the application and issued Policy No. 031097335 on February 5, 2001, naming respondents as beneficiaries entitled to ₱1,000,000.00 in death benefits. Atty. Jesus Jr. died from a gunshot wound on May 11, 2001, merely three months after the policy issuance. |
When an insured dies within the two-year contestability period, the insurer is absolutely bound to pay the policy proceeds even if the policy was obtained through fraudulent concealment or misrepresentation, as the death triggers the incontestability clause under Section 48 of the Insurance Code; moreover, concealment is an affirmative defense which the insurer must prove by satisfactory and convincing evidence, and the failure to disclose subsequent medical treatments does not constitute fraudulent concealment where the insured disclosed prior treatment for the same condition and authorized the insurer to investigate. |
Commercial Laws II Undetermined Insurance Law — Life Insurance — Incontestability Period — Concealment or Misrepresentation |
|
Burgos vs. Naval (8th June 2016) |
AK729043 G.R. No. 219468 |
Jose Burgos, Jr. and his wife, Rubie S. Garcia-Burgos, were the registered owners of a 1,389-square-meter lot in Taytay, Rizal, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. 550579. After mortgaging the property to Antonio Assad in 1996, the spouses sought a loan from respondents Spouses Eladio and Arlina Naval to avoid foreclosure. The Navals allegedly required the spouses to sign blank documents as a condition for the loan. |
Only the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) possesses the legal authority to represent the People of the Philippines in appeals or special civil actions for certiorari involving the criminal aspect of a case before the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals; a private complainant may not prosecute such actions in the name of the People without OSG authorization, though he may independently pursue remedies limited to the preservation of civil liability. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Certiorari — Authority of the Office of the Solicitor General to Represent the People in Criminal Proceedings |
|
Province of Antique vs. Calabocal (8th June 2016) |
AK362669 G.R. No. 209146 786 Phil. 787 113 OG No. 17, 3071 |
In the late 1970s, the mayor of Bulalacao, Oriental Mindoro, orally lent the administration of Liwagao Island, a 114-hectare island situated between Oriental Mindoro and Antique, to the mayor of Caluya, Antique, on condition that the island would be returned upon the end of either official’s term. After both mayors’ terms ended in 1987, Caluya continued to exercise authority over the island. Oriental Mindoro passed resolutions asserting its jurisdictional rights and, in 2012, called for a joint session of the two provincial sanggunians to settle the dispute amicably. Antique initially indicated willingness but subsequently issued Resolution No. 142-2012, declaring it was not amenable to any… |
A boundary dispute under the Local Government Code exists when a portion or the whole of a local government unit’s territorial area is claimed by two or more local government units; the mandatory administrative settlement procedure need not be exhausted where one party’s categorical refusal to participate makes compliance impossible or futile, thus permitting direct judicial action. |
Local Government Code — Boundary Disputes — Jurisdiction of Regional Trial Court after Failure of Settlement by Sangguniang Panlalawigan |
|
Eustaquio vs. Navales (8th June 2016) |
AK687823 A.C. No. 10465 |
Complainants spouses Lamberto V. Eustaquio and Gloria J. Eustaquio owned an apartment at 4-D Cavite St., Barangay Paltok, SFDM, Quezon City, which they leased to respondent Atty. Edgar R. Navales under a Contract of Lease dated April 16, 2005. Respondent was a member of the Philippine Bar who, during the pendency of the administrative case against him, was appointed as an Assistant City Public Prosecutor of Quezon City — a position requiring the authority to practice law under Section 9 of Republic Act No. 10071, the "Prosecution Service Act of 2010." |
A lawyer who continues to discharge the functions of a government position requiring authority to practice law, despite a final and executory order of suspension from the practice of law, is guilty of willful disobedience to a lawful order of a superior court and of willfully appearing as an attorney without authority, warranting further suspension under Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court. |
Legal Ethics — Suspension from Practice of Law — Willful Disobedience of Court Order and Unauthorized Practice While Suspended |
|
Otamias vs. Republic (8th June 2016) |
AK794454 G.R. No. 189516 786 Phil. 517 113 OG No. 16, 2865 |
Edna Mabugay-Otamias and retired Colonel Francisco B. Otamias were married on June 16, 1978 and had five children. They separated in September 2000 due to his alleged infidelity, with the children remaining with Edna. Colonel Otamias retired from military service on April 1, 2003, his pension constituting his sole source of income. The dispute centers on whether AFP retirement pension benefits, statutorily exempt from execution under Section 31 of Presidential Decree No. 1638, may be reached by a writ of execution for family support when the retiree himself executed a Deed of Assignment waiving a portion thereof in favor of his legitimate family. |
A statutory exemption from execution of pension benefits may be waived by the retiree through a Deed of Assignment granting a portion of his retirement benefits to his family for support, provided the waiver is not contrary to law, public policy, morals, or good customs, and does not prejudice a third person with a recognized legal right. |
Civil Law — Family Law — Support — Execution of Pension Benefits — Waiver of Statutory Exemption from Execution |
|
Dio vs. People (8th June 2016) |
AK174372 G.R. No. 208146 786 Phil. 726 |
Private respondent Timothy Desmond is the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, while petitioner Virginia Dio serves as Treasurer and Member of the Board of Directors of the same corporation. The relationship between the parties as corporate officers of the same entity provides the context for the allegedly defamatory electronic messages that gave rise to the libel charges. The informations were filed under Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, which punishes libel by means of writings or similar means, at a time when Republic Act No. 10175 (the Anti-Cybercrime Law) had not yet been enacted. |
A defect in an information arising from failure to allege facts constituting an offense — including failure to establish venue in a libel case — is curable by amendment before arraignment, and the prosecution must be given the opportunity to amend before the information may be quashed. The proscription against amendments that operate to vest jurisdiction in the trial court applies only where the accused has already been arraigned under a defective information. |
Criminal Law — Libel — Amendment of Information — Venue as Jurisdictional Defect |
|
Interport Resources Corp. vs. Securities Specialist, Inc. (6th June 2016) |
AK041544 G.R. No. 154069 786 Phil. 275 C.A.-G.R. SP No. 66600 SEC AC No. 501-502 |
In 1978, Oceanic Oil & Mineral Resources, Inc. merged with Interport Resources Corporation, with Interport as the surviving entity. Prior to the merger, R.C. Lee had subscribed to 5,000,000 shares of Oceanic stock, paying only 25% of the subscription price. In 1979, R.C. Lee assigned these subscription agreements to Securities Specialist, Inc. (SSI) through stock assignments indorsed in blank. A decade later, when Interport called for the payment of subscription balances, it refused to recognize SSI's rights despite the prior assignment, leading to a dispute over ownership of the shares and the validity of the transfer under the Corporation Code and Civil Code provisions on novation. |
The assignment of stock subscription agreements operates as a novation by substitution of debtor under Article 1293 of the Civil Code, requiring the corporation to recognize the assignee as the new subscriber entitled to pay the balance and receive the shares, notwithstanding the lack of registration in the stock and transfer book when the corporation has unduly refused to recognize the transfer; however, exemplary damages and attorney's fees may not be awarded solely on the basis of bad faith absent a showing of wanton, fraudulent, oppressive, or malevolent conduct. |
Corporation and Basic Securities Law Certificate of Stock and Transfer of Shares |
|
Navarra vs. People of the Philippines (6th June 2016) |
AK037797 G.R. No. 203750 |
Reynolds Philippines Corporation (Reynolds) maintained a banking relationship with Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC), which had extended to Reynolds a loan line of ₱82 million and a foreign exchange line of ₱900,000.00. As part of its loan obligations, Reynolds issued several promissory notes to HSBC. Subsequently, Reynolds, through its Chief Finance Officer Jorge B. Navarra and Vice-President for Corporate Affairs George Molina, issued seven Asia Trust checks totaling ₱45.2 million purportedly to cover its outstanding loan obligations. Upon presentment on July 11, 2000, all seven checks were dishonored for being "Drawn Against Insufficient Funds." Despite notices of dishonor… |
The mere act of issuing a worthless check constitutes a malum prohibitum offense punishable under Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 regardless of the purpose for which the check was issued or whether it was intended merely as a guarantee or condition for loan restructuring, and corporate officers who actually sign bouncing checks in behalf of the corporation are personally liable for the offense, with their criminal liability fused with the civil liability of the corporation under Section 1 of the law. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (Bouncing Checks Law) — Corporate Officer Liability — Certification Against Forum Shopping |
|
Fyfe vs. Philippine Airlines, Inc. (6th June 2016) |
AK226430 G.R. No. 160071 |
The respondent, Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL), underwent rehabilitation proceedings in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1998, which issued an order dated July 1, 1998 suspending all claims for payment against it. To convince its creditors to approve its rehabilitation plan, PAL hired technical advisers with experience in the airline industry, leading to the formation of Regent Star Services Ltd. (Regent Star) and the execution of a Technical Services Agreement (TSA) with PAL. The TSA contained an arbitration clause providing for dispute resolution through the Philippine Dispute Resolution Center, Inc. (PDRCI). |
The proper remedy from an order of the Regional Trial Court vacating, confirming, correcting, or modifying a domestic arbitral award under the Arbitration Law (R.A. 876) is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, not an ordinary appeal under Rule 41, because Section 29 of the Arbitration Law limits the appeal to questions of law. The Court also held that a suspension order issued by the SEC in rehabilitation proceedings deprives all other tribunals, including arbitration panels, of jurisdiction to hear claims for payment against the distressed corporation. |
Arbitration — Vacating Arbitral Award — Jurisdiction during Corporate Rehabilitation |
|
Sugarsteel Industrial, Inc. and Mr. Ben Yapjoco vs. Victor Albina, Vicente Uy and Alex Velasquez (6th June 2016) |
AK057698 G.R. No. 168749 |
Sugarsteel Industrial, Inc. employed Victor Albina, Vicente Uy, and Alex Velasquez as kettleman, assistant kettleman, and inspector, respectively; Ben Yapjoco was its manager. The employment relationship and the Labor Code's rules on appeals from the Labor Arbiter to the NLRC under Article 223 and on dismissal for gross and habitual neglect under Article 282(b) provide the statutory backdrop for the dispute. |
In a special civil action for certiorari, the Court of Appeals may pass upon the evidence and review the NLRC's factual findings when they are not supported by substantial evidence, because an NLRC decision not supported by substantial evidence is tainted with grave abuse of discretion. Dismissal for neglect under Article 282(b) of the Labor Code requires the negligence to be both gross and habitual; a single or isolated act of negligence does not constitute just cause. |
Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Gross and Habitual Neglect of Duty — Scope of CA Review on Certiorari |
|
Roman, Jr. vs. Securities and Exchange Commission (1st June 2016) |
AK892411 G.R. No. 196329 786 Phil. 75 |
Minority shareholders of Capitol Hills Golf and Country Club, Inc. filed a verified letter-complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that the corporation’s president, Pablo B. Roman, Jr., and other officers committed fraud, misrepresentation, and gross mismanagement in connection with transactions involving Ayala Land Inc. The shareholders claimed that the officers concealed unauthorized cash advances, misrepresented the status of a golf course development, and caused financial losses, wastage, and dissipation of corporate funds. The complaint prayed for an SEC investigation into the alleged irregularities and for the creation of a management committee to temporarily ov… |
The Securities and Exchange Commission retains administrative, regulatory, and supervisory jurisdiction to investigate complaints alleging violations of the Securities Regulation Code, even if such complaints incidentally raise intra-corporate matters, and may constitute a management committee as an implied power necessary to carry out its express supervisory functions. |
Securities Regulation — Jurisdiction of Securities and Exchange Commission over intra-corporate disputes; Authority to create Management Committee under regulatory powers |
|
Kho vs. Republic of the Philippines (1st June 2016) |
AK817708 G.R. No. 187462 |
Raquel G. Kho and Veronica B. Kho were married on June 1, 1972, in Arteche, Eastern Samar. Their marriage was celebrated prior to the effectivity of the Family Code, thus governed by the Civil Code. The dispute centers on whether their marriage was solemnized with the requisite marriage license, an essential requisite under Article 53 of the Civil Code. |
A certification from the Local Civil Registrar attesting to the absence of a marriage license in its records is adequate to prove the non-issuance of said license, thereby overcoming the presumption of validity of marriage and shifting the burden to the party alleging validity to prove that the license was secured. Failure to produce the license renders the marriage void ab initio. |
Civil Law — Marriage — Declaration of Nullity of Marriage — Absence of Marriage License under the Civil Code |
|
Calimag vs. Heirs of Macapaz (1st June 2016) |
AK460391 G.R. No. 191936 |
Virginia D. Calimag co-owned a 299-square-meter property in Makati City with Silvestra N. Macapaz under TCT No. 183088. Silvestra died without issue on November 11, 2002. The respondents—Anastacio P. Macapaz, Jr. and Alicia Macapaz-Ritua—are the children of Silvestra's brother, Anastacio Macapaz, Sr., and Fidela O. Poblete Vda. de Macapaz. An adverse claim by Fidela over a 49.5-square-meter portion of the property was annotated on the title. The dispute centers on whether the respondents, as heirs of Silvestra's brother, have legal standing to annul a deed of sale that petitioner used to cancel the co-owned title and consolidate ownership in her name, and whether Article 992 of the Civil Co… |
A certificate of live birth, as a public document, is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, including the marriage of the parents and the legitimate filiation of children born during such union, and the signature of the father is not required for the registration of a legitimate child's birth under Section 5 of Act No. 3753. The presumption of validity of marriage (semper praesumitur pro matrimonio) applies where parties openly cohabited as husband and wife, and such presumption, combined with birth certificates declaring the parents' marriage date and place, suffices to establish legitimate filiation even without the marriage certificate itself. |
Civil Law — Succession — Legitimate Filiation and Right to Inherit under Article 992 of the Civil Code |
|
Stronghold Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Pamana Island Resort Hotel and Marina Club, Inc. (1st June 2016) |
AK444371 G.R. No. 174838 |
Pamana Island Resort Hotel and Marina Club, Inc. engaged Flowtech Construction Corporation to construct a project on Pamana Island, Subic Bay. Flowtech obtained a Contractor's All Risk Bond in the amount of ₱9,047,960.14 from Stronghold Insurance Company, Inc. to secure the construction. Section 243 of the Insurance Code governs the timeliness of payment of insurance claims and prescribes a penalty of interest at double the ceiling prescribed by the Monetary Board for failure or refusal to pay within the periods stated therein. |
A final and executory judgment may not be modified during execution, even to correct the computation of interest, except only for clerical errors, nunc pro tunc entries causing no prejudice, or void judgments; and the penalty interest under Section 243 of the Insurance Code is computed at double the BSP-prescribed rate for loans or forbearance of money, applied prospectively from the effectivity of any BSP circular changing that rate. |
Insurance Law — Interest on Insurance Proceeds — Applicable Rate under Section 243 of the Insurance Code — Immutability of Final Judgments |
|
People vs. Molina (1st June 2016) |
AK411849 G.R. No. 207811 |
Delia Molina was the President of Southern Cotabato Landbase Management Corporation (SCLMC), a recruitment agency registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). The SCLMC's license to conduct business was temporarily suspended by the POEA during April and May 2006, the period alleged in the Informations, and the suspension was lifted on July 31, 2006. The SCLMC had no job order for Korea, as only seven agencies were allowed to deploy workers to Korea at that time. |
The elements of illegal recruitment in large scale under Article 13(b) of the Labor Code and Section 6 of R.A. No. 8042 are: (1) the offender has no valid license or authority required by law to lawfully engage in recruitment and placement of workers; (2) the offender undertakes any of the activities within the meaning of "recruitment and placement" under Article 13(b) of the Labor Code, or any of the prohibited practices enumerated under Article 34 of the said Code (now Section 6 of R.A. 8042); and (3) the offender committed the same against three or more persons, individually or as a group. A holder of a license or authority may still be liable for illegal recruitment under Section 6 … |
Criminal Law — Illegal Recruitment in Large Scale and Simple Illegal Recruitment under R.A. 8042 |
|
Atty. Romeo G. Roxas vs. Republic Real Estate Corporation (1st June 2016) |
AK967342 G.R. No. 208205 G.R. No. 208212 786 Phil. 163 |
Republic Real Estate Corporation (RREC) entered into a reclamation agreement with Pasay City in 1959, authorized by Pasay City Council Ordinances No. 121 and No. 158, to reclaim 300 hectares of foreshore lands along Manila Bay. The Republic sued to nullify the agreement, and in Republic vs. Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court declared the agreement and ordinances null and void as ultra vires and contrary to Republic Act No. 1899, but awarded RREC and Pasay City P10,926,071.29 plus 6% interest per annum from May 1, 1962, based on quantum meruit. The present consolidated petitions arise from RREC's repeated attempts to relitigate and inflate that final award, and from the counsel dispute be… |
A final and executory judgment is immutable and unalterable, and neither the trial court nor the sheriff may, through a writ of execution or notice purporting to implement it, directly or indirectly alter its terms. The sheriff's execution of judgment is a purely ministerial phase of adjudication, and the sheriff must strictly conform to the letter of the dispositive portion of the judgment. |
Civil Law — Execution of Judgments — Immutability of Final Judgments and Ministerial Duty of Sheriffs |
|
Ricafort vs. Medina (31st May 2016) |
AK640301 A.C. No. 5179 |
Dionnie Ricafort was a tricycle driver in Surigao City. Atty. Rene O. Medina was a member of the Bar and, at the time of the incident, a provincial board member of Surigao del Norte. The two had no prior professional or transactional relationship; their encounter arose solely from a traffic incident on a public street. |
A lawyer who publicly humiliates another by slapping him on the face, coupled with an arrogant assertion of status, violates Canon 7, Rule 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and is subject to suspension, such conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice and discrediting the legal profession. |
Legal Ethics — Administrative Liability of Lawyers — Misconduct and Violation of Canon 7, Rule 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Slapping in Public |
|
Capitol Wireless, Inc. vs. Provincial Treasurer of Batangas (30th May 2016) |
AK786051 791 SCRA 272 785 Phil. 712 G.R. No. 180110 |
Capwire is a Philippine corporation engaged in international telecommunications, co-owning submarine cable systems connecting various countries. It claimed ownership only of the "Wet Segment" (submerged portions) while alleging that landing stations in Nasugbu, Batangas were owned by PLDT. For loan restructuring, Capwire submitted a Sworn Statement of True Value of Real Properties to the Provincial Treasurer of Batangas, listing values for various cable systems. The Provincial Assessor subsequently issued Assessments of Real Property (ARP), treating the cables as taxable real property. |
Submarine communications cables may be classified as taxable real property (as "machinery") under the Local Government Code to the extent they are located within the taxing authority's jurisdiction, and factual disputes regarding the extent of such property within the jurisdiction, the nature of ownership, and the corresponding assessment must first be brought before the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) and Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) before resort to judicial action. |
Property and Land Law |
|
Magallanes Watercraft Association, Inc. vs. Auguis (30th May 2016) |
AK062760 G.R. No. 211485 785 Phil. 866 |
The dispute arises from the enforcement of membership obligations within a local association of motorized banca operators. It addresses the scope of corporate powers of non-stock corporations, particularly whether disciplinary measures such as the suspension of membership privileges for non-payment of dues fall within the corporation's powers when not explicitly enumerated in its governing documents. |
A corporation possesses not only express powers conferred by law or its articles of incorporation, but also implied powers necessary or incidental to the exercise of those expressly conferred; an act reasonably necessary or proper to promote the interest or welfare of the corporation, and logically related to its corporate purpose, is not ultra vires even if not expressly provided in the charter or by-laws. |
Corporation and Basic Securities Law Ultra Vires Acts |
|
Bradford United Church of Christ, Inc. vs. Ando (30th May 2016) |
AK554120 G.R. No. 195669 |
BUCCI and respondents (members of the Mandaue Bradford Church Council, the Mandaue Bradford Church, and the United Church of Christ in the Philippines, Inc.) disputed possession and ownership of Lot 3-F in Mandaue City. Prior to the filing of the unlawful detainer case, the respondents had initiated Civil Case No. MAN-1669 before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) for recovery of ownership with preliminary injunction over Lot 3-F and another parcel (Lot 3-C). On October 13, 1997, the RTC rendered judgment in favor of BUCCI in that ownership case, but the respondents filed a motion for reconsideration that remained pending resolution until March 10, 2005. During the pendency of this motion for r… |
The simultaneous pendency of an action for recovery of ownership does not bar the filing or maintenance of a summary action for unlawful detainer concerning the same property, provided the causes of action are distinct—unlawful detainer being limited to the question of physical or material possession (possession de facto) independent of ownership claims, while recovery of ownership concerns dominical rights and title. |
Undetermined Remedial Law — Forum-Shopping — Certification against Forum-Shopping — Unlawful Detainer and Recovery of Ownership |
|
Republic vs. Rayos Del Sol (30th May 2016) |
AK686993 G.R. No. 211698 |
Felipe Del Sol cultivated Lot 8173-A in Barangay Ligid Tipas, Taguig during his lifetime until his death on July 2, 1932. His son, Jose Rayos Del Sol, continued farming the land until his death on September 25, 1953. The respondents, children of Jose and grandchildren of Felipe, inherited the property and continued possession through tenants. The land, part of the alienable and disposable public domain per L.C. Map No. 2623 certified on January 3, 1968, was declared for taxation purposes as early as 1948. |
Tax declarations, though not conclusive evidence of ownership, constitute proof of a claim of title and serve as sufficient basis for inferring possession in the concept of an owner; when coupled with credible testimonial evidence establishing possession since June 12, 1945 or earlier, they satisfy the requirements for original registration of imperfect title under Section 14(1) of P.D. No. 1529. |
Undetermined Land Registration — Original Registration of Title — Section 14(1) of P.D. No. 1529 — Open, Continuous, Exclusive and Notorious Possession |
|
Abayon vs. HRET and Daza (3rd May 2016) |
AK996869 G.R. No. 222236 G.R. No. 223032 785 Phil. 683 113 OG No. 10, 1863 |
In the May 13, 2013 elections for Representative of the First Legislative District of Northern Samar, petitioner Harlin C. Abayon obtained 72,857 votes while private respondent Raul A. Daza received 72,805 votes—a difference of 52 votes. Abayon was proclaimed the winner on May 17, 2013. |
An election tribunal may annul election results on the ground of terrorism only upon clear and convincing proof that (1) the illegality affected more than fifty percent (50%) of the votes cast in the contested precincts, and (2) it is impossible to distinguish with reasonable certainty between lawful and unlawful ballots. The HRET’s annulment of elections, unsupported by such evidence, constitutes grave abuse of discretion. |
Election Law — Election Protest — Annulment of Election Results on Ground of Terrorism — Jurisdiction of House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal |
|
Philippine National Bank vs. Spouses Rivera (20th April 2016) |
AK828285 G.R. No. 189577 |
The case involves a real estate mortgage executed by Spouses Rivera in favor of Philippine National Bank (PNB) to secure housing loans and a revolving credit line. Following default, PNB initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings, leading to a public auction sale of the mortgaged property where PNB emerged as the highest bidder. The spouses subsequently sought to annul the sale, claiming they had fully satisfied their obligation and were deprived of proper notice due to the bank's failure to send notice to their correct address despite contractual stipulations. |
A complaint for annulment of sheriff's sale sufficiently states a cause of action when it alleges that the mortgagor had fully paid the mortgage obligation and was not properly notified of the auction sale, as these allegations, if hypothetically admitted, demonstrate a violation of the mortgagor's rights that warrants annulment of the foreclosure sale. |
Undetermined Civil Procedure — Failure to State Cause of Action — Annulment of Sheriff's Sale with Damages |
|
Fajardo vs. Alvarez (20th April 2016) |
AK374380 A.C. No. 9018 |
Teresita P. Fajardo served as the Municipal Treasurer of San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija. In 2008, the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon issued a decision finding her guilty of serious dishonesty and ordering her dismissal from service, along with a resolution recommending her indictment for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act). Facing these administrative and criminal charges, Fajardo sought legal assistance. |
A government lawyer authorized to engage in private practice under Section 7(b)(2) of Republic Act No. 6713 nonetheless commits unauthorized practice when such representation conflicts with or tends to conflict with official functions, particularly when the lawyer represents a private client against a government office such as the Ombudsman. Furthermore, a lawyer who implies to a client that favorable decisions can be obtained through personal connections with adjudicators engages in influence peddling that violates Canons 1, 7, and 13 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and warrants severe disciplinary sanctions. |
Undetermined Legal Ethics — Unauthorized Practice of Law — Government Lawyers — Conflict of Interest — Influence Peddling |
|
Victoria vs. Pidlaoan (20th April 2016) |
AK385708 G.R. No. 196470 |
Elma Pidlaoan purchased a 201-square-meter lot in Lucena City in 1984, registered solely in her name under Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-50282. Her partner, Rosario Victoria, constructed a house on the lot but subsequently left for Saudi Arabia. In 1989, Elma mortgaged the property to secure a loan. When foreclosure loomed, Elma sought financial assistance from her sister-in-law, Eufemia Pidlaoan, who arranged for her daughter, Normita Jacob Pidlaoan, to lend Elma the redemption amount. Unable to repay the loan, Elma offered to sell the property to Normita. The parties initially executed an unnotarized deed of sale, but upon a notary public's advice to avoid capital gains tax, t… |
A deed of donation executed to avoid tax liabilities is relatively simulated when the parties' contemporaneous and subsequent acts demonstrate an intent to effect an absolute sale, and the parties are bound by their real agreement as disclosed by their conduct and admissions, notwithstanding the presumption of regularity attaching to notarized documents. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Contracts — Simulation — Relative Simulation of Deed of Donation to disguise a Contract of Sale |
|
Domingo vs. Molina (20th April 2016) |
AK692999 G.R. No. 200274 |
Spouses Anastacio and Flora Domingo, married prior to the effectivity of the Family Code, acquired a one-half undivided portion of a parcel of land in Camiling, Tarlac in 1951 as conjugal property. Flora died in 1968, leaving Anastacio and their children as heirs. In 1978, Anastacio executed a sale of his interest over the property to the spouses Genaro and Elena Molina to satisfy his debts. The sale was annotated on the Original Certificate of Title and later registered in 1995 under Transfer Certificate of Title No. 272967 in the names of the spouses Molina. |
Upon the death of a spouse, the conjugal partnership of gains is dissolved and an implied co-ownership arises among the surviving spouse and the heirs of the deceased pending liquidation and partition, entitling the surviving spouse to freely alienate his undivided interest in the conjugal property but obligating him to hold in trust for the other co-heirs any portion exceeding his share, which may only be recovered through an action for partition. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Conjugal Partnership of Gains — Validity of Sale by Surviving Spouse Without Prior Liquidation; Co-ownership — Alienation of Undivided Interest |
|
Malayan Insurance Company, Inc. vs. Alibudbud (20th April 2016) |
AK631271 G.R. No. 209011 |
Diana P. Alibudbud was hired by Malayan Insurance Company, Inc. as Senior Vice President for its Sales Department on July 5, 2004. As part of her employment benefits, she availed of Malayan’s Car Financing Plan and was issued a Honda Civic sedan. She simultaneously executed a promissory note and a deed of chattel mortgage in Malayan’s favor, undertaking to pay the loan in monthly installments, with a stipulation that the entire remaining balance would become immediately due and the vehicle surrenderable if she left the company within three years. On July 18, 2005, Malayan dismissed Alibudbud on the ground of redundancy, triggering the acceleration clause. When she refused to surrender the c… |
A complaint for replevin rooted in a promissory note and a deed of chattel mortgage executed by an employee under a company car financing plan is a civil action over which the regular courts have jurisdiction; the cause of action arises from a debtor-creditor relationship, not from the employer-employee relationship, even though the plan was availed of as an incident of employment. |
Remedial Law — Jurisdiction — Replevin action between employer and employee |
|
People of the Philippines vs. Lipata (20th April 2016) |
AK582064 G.R. No. 200302 |
Appellant Gerry Lipata y Ortiza was charged with Murder for the fatal stabbing of Rolando Cueno on 1 September 2005 in Quezon City, allegedly committed in conspiracy with his brothers Larry and Rudy Lipata. The case was tried in the RTC, appealed to the CA, and then elevated to the Supreme Court. During the pendency of the appeal before the Supreme Court, it was discovered that appellant had died on 13 February 2011 while confined at the Quezon City Jail—months before the CA promulgated its decision on 31 May 2011. This procedural anomaly required the Court to determine the effect of appellant's pre-judgment death on both his criminal and civil liabilities, and whether the victim's heirs co… |
The death of the accused pending appeal of his conviction, occurring before final judgment, totally extinguishes his criminal liability and civil liability ex delicto; any surviving civil liability predicated on a source of obligation other than delict—such as quasi-delict—must be pursued through a separate civil action, which the offended party must institute independently of the criminal proceedings. |
Criminal Law — Murder — Extinction of Criminal and Civil Liability Ex Delicto by Death of Accused Pending Appeal — Independent Civil Action for Quasi-Delict |
|
Tulio vs. Atty. Buhangin (20th April 2016) |
AK771486 A.C. No. 7110 |
Arthur S. Tulio engaged the services of Atty. Gregory F. Buhangin, initially as a surveyor for his mother's estate and later as legal counsel. Atty. Buhangin prepared and notarized a Deed of Waiver of Rights executed by Tulio's siblings in favor of Tulio, and subsequently represented Tulio in a specific performance case involving the property. The dispute arose when Atty. Buhangin later represented Tulio's siblings to rescind the very deed he prepared. |
A lawyer is prohibited from representing new clients whose interests oppose those of a former client in any manner, whether or not they are parties in the same action or on totally unrelated cases. |
Legal Ethics — Conflict of Interest — Disbarment/Suspension of Lawyer |
|
Blue Eagle Management, Inc. vs. Naval (19th April 2016) |
AK346250 G.R. No. 192488 |
Petitioner Blue Eagle Management, Inc. (BEMI) is a domestic corporation organized in 2004 to operate the Moro Lorenzo Sports Center (MLSC) within the Ateneo de Manila University compound under a Memorandum of Agreement. BEMI commenced operations on January 2, 2005, absorbing all employees of the previous operator. In its first year, BEMI suffered net losses of P3,293,816.14, with gross profits insufficient to cover administrative expenses, particularly salaries. Respondent Jocelyn L. Naval was hired as maintenance staff on January 15, 2005. In December 2005, an incident occurred wherein a regular gym customer, Dr. Florendo, allegedly berated Naval after an argument involving referees at the… |
Voluntary resignation is established where an employee, faced with imminent retrenchment due to substantial business losses proven by audited financial statements, executes a resignation letter in her own handwriting and accepts enhanced separation benefits, absent clear proof of coercion, fraud, or unconscionable terms. |
Undetermined Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Voluntary Resignation — Retrenchment to Prevent Losses |
|
William Go Que Construction and/or William Go Que vs. Court of Appeals and Danny Singson, Rodolfo Pasaqui, Lendo Lominiqui, and Jun Andales (19th April 2016) |
AK620854 G.R. No. 191699 |
Private respondents Danny Singson, Rodolfo Pasaqui, Lendo Lominiqui, and Jun Andales were workers who filed illegal dismissal complaints against petitioner William Go Que Construction and/or William Go Que before the National Labor Relations Commission. The dispute arose from petitioner's allegation that the workers stole unused steel bars from the construction site, which led to their separation from employment. The procedural requirements of verification and certification against forum shopping under the Rules of Court, in relation to the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, became the central legal framework governing the dispute's progress through the appellate courts. |
The photocopies of private subdivision identification cards and a joint affidavit of co-parties do not constitute competent evidence of identity under the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, and the CA gravely abused its discretion in treating them as substantial compliance with the requirements of verification and certification against forum shopping. Competent evidence of identity requires either at least one current identification document issued by an official agency bearing the photograph and signature of the individual, or the oath or affirmation of one credible witness not privy to the instrument who is personally known to the notary public and personally knows the individual, or of… |
Civil Procedure — Verification and Certification Against Forum Shopping — Competent Evidence of Identity |
|
Philcomsat Holdings Corporation vs. Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Atty. Sikini C. Labastilla (19th April 2016) |
AK719938 A.C. No. 11139 |
Complainant PHILCOMSAT Holdings Corporation, represented by its director and treasurer Erlinda I. Bildner, filed an administrative complaint before the Commission on Bar Discipline of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) against respondents Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Atty. Sikini C. Labastilla. Atty. Lokin, Jr. was a director of PHILCOMSAT who had control and management of the company's financial records, while Atty. Labastilla served as the company's external counsel in an injunction case against Philippine Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (POTC) before the Sandiganbayan. The complaint sought disbarment for insinuating that the Sandiganbayan received P2,000,000.00 in exchan… |
A lawyer who causes or participates in the creation of a checkbook entry imputing corrupt motives against a court violates Canons 7 and 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and is subject to suspension from the practice of law, as such conduct undermines the dignity and authority of the courts and erodes public confidence in the judicial institution. |
Legal Ethics — Violation of Canons 7 and 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility — Imputing Corruption against the Court |
|
Legaspi vs. COMELEC (19th April 2016) |
AK457415 G.R. No. 216572 |
Feliciano Legaspi, Alfredo D. Germar, and Rogelio P. Santos, Jr. were candidates in the May 13, 2013 elections in Norzagaray, Bulacan, with Legaspi and Germar running for mayor and Santos for councilor. Under Sec. 3, Art. IX-C of the 1987 Constitution, the COMELEC may sit en banc or in two divisions, and all election cases shall be heard and decided in division, provided that motions for reconsideration of decisions shall be decided by the Commission en banc. Sec. 7, Art. IX-A requires each Commission to decide by a majority vote of all its Members, and Sec. 6, Rule 18 of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure governs the procedure when the en banc is equally divided or the necessary majority canno… |
A motion for reconsideration before the COMELEC en banc is an incidental matter; if the COMELEC en banc fails to muster the required four votes, the motion is deemed denied and the COMELEC Division's ruling stands. The Mendoza doctrine, which allowed dismissal of the entire original action upon such failure, is unconstitutional for circumventing the four-vote requirement and diminishing the adjudicatory powers of the COMELEC Divisions. |
Election Law — COMELEC Rules of Procedure — Voting Requirements for Motions for Reconsideration |
|
Republic vs. Regulto (18th April 2016) |
AK032018 G.R. No. 202051 784 Phil. 805 |
Spouses Ildefonso and Francia Regulto acquired a 300-square-meter residential lot in Mabel, Naga City by virtue of a deed of absolute sale executed in February 1994. The property was originally part of a 7,759-square-meter tract granted by free patent under Commonwealth Act No. 141 and registered under Original Certificate of Title No. 235 dated April 14, 1956. In April 2011, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) commenced construction of the Naga City-Milaor Bypass Road, which would traverse 162 square meters of the spouses' property, initially offering P243,000.00 as just compensation but subsequently withdrawing the offer based on the claim that the property was subject to a… |
A legal easement of right-of-way exists in favor of the government over land originally granted by free patent under the Public Land Act, which subsists even after transfer to private owners and is not subject to any time limitation; however, when the enforcement of such easement results in material impairment of the value of the remaining property (such as when more than half of the property is appropriated for public use), the government must pay just compensation for the remaining area under the principles of eminent domain. |
Undetermined Eminent Domain — Just Compensation — Legal Easement over Free Patent Lands — Compensable Area of Remaining Property |
|
Castillo vs. De Leon Castillo (18th April 2016) |
AK080327 G.R. No. 189607 |
On 25 May 1972, respondent Lea P. De Leon Castillo married Benjamin Bautista. On 6 January 1979, she contracted a second marriage with petitioner Renato A. Castillo. The parties had three children born in 1979, 1981, and 1985. In 2001, Renato initiated proceedings to declare the second marriage null, alleging that Lea's prior subsisting marriage rendered their union bigamous and void. |
Under the Civil Code, a judicial declaration of nullity is not required to establish the invalidity of a void marriage, and a party may contract a subsequent valid marriage without such decree provided the first marriage is void ab initio; this rule applies to marriages celebrated before the effectivity of the Family Code on 3 August 1988, notwithstanding the contrary requirement under Article 40 of the Family Code. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Marriage — Nullity of Marriage — Judicial Declaration Requirement under the Civil Code |
|
Bacolor vs. VL Makabali Memorial Hospital, Inc. (18th April 2016) |
AK464591 G.R. No. 204325 |
Six resident physicians—Drs. Lynman Bacolor, Jeffrey Galura, Helen Torres, Fritzie Villegas, Raymond Canlas, and Zheila Torres—together with Dr. Dax Tidula, filed an amended complaint for illegal dismissal and money claims against VL Makabali Memorial Hospital, Inc., its owner/president Alejandro Makabali, and ER Manager Melchor Catambing. They alleged that after their fixed-term contracts expired, they continued to be employed but were later told to resign and re-apply under one-year contracts. Upon refusal, they were demoted to assistant physicians in the operating room. Some were charged with rule violations; Drs. Bacolor and Galura received termination notices. The Labor Arbiter found i… |
A certificate against forum shopping signed by some, but not all, petitioners substantially complies with the Rules when all petitioners share a common interest and invoke a common cause of action; verification is substantially complied with when at least one petitioner with sufficient knowledge signs. Procedural rules must be liberally construed to serve substantial justice, particularly when the labor arbiter and the NLRC reach conflicting findings. |
Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Remedial Law — Verification and Certificate Against Forum Shopping; Requirements under Rule 7, Section 5 and Rule 46, Section 3 of the Rules of Court |
|
Insular Life Assurance Company, Ltd. vs. Khu (18th April 2016) |
AK263945 G.R. No. 195176 |
Felipe N. Khu, Sr. procured a life insurance policy from The Insular Life Assurance Company, Ltd. under its Diamond Jubilee Insurance Plan, with a face value of ₱1,000,000.00, effective June 22, 1997. The policy lapsed on June 23, 1999 for non-payment of premium, after which Felipe sought reinstatement. The reinstatement process involved a Letter of Acceptance and an Endorsement — both pro-forma documents prepared by Insular Life — which contained the phrase "effective June 22, 1999" whose referent was ambiguous. The legal framework governing the dispute is Section 48 of the Insurance Code (Presidential Decree No. 612), which bars an insurer from rescinding a life insurance policy on the gr… |
The date of last reinstatement under Section 48 of the Insurance Code pertains to the date the insurer approved the application for reinstatement; however, where the insurer's own reinstatement documents contain ambiguous language regarding the effective date of reinstatement, the ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the insured, and the reinstatement is reckoned from the date favorable to the insured. |
Commercial Laws II Insurance Law — Life Insurance Policy Reinstatement — Two-Year Contestability Period — Ambiguity in Insurance Contract |
|
Robina Farms Cebu/Universal Robina Corporation vs. Villa (18th April 2016) |
AK883607 G.R. No. 175869 |
Elizabeth Villa had been employed by Robina Farms Cebu, a division of Universal Robina Corporation, as a sales clerk since August 1981. In the latter part of 2001, the petitioner offered a special retirement program to employees who had served at least ten years, and Villa applied for retirement under that program, expecting benefits equivalent to 86% of her salary rate for every year of service. The petitioner's management did not approve the benefits at the rate Villa applied for, offering instead only half-month pay for every year of service, and advised her to tender a resignation with a request for financial assistance if she wished to pursue retirement. The dispute arose from the inte… |
An employer's act of advising an employee to resign with a request for financial assistance, preventing her re-entry after a suspension, confiscating her gate pass, and informing her she has been replaced constitutes illegal dismissal, notwithstanding the employee's prior application for an early retirement program whose benefits were never approved at the rate she expected. The employee's application for retirement does not manifest voluntary intent to sever the employment relationship where her consent was obtained under the mistaken belief that she would receive a higher benefit, and the employer never actually approved the retirement at the offered rate. |
Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Early Retirement Program — Voluntariness of Retirement |
|
Ang vs. Chinatrust (Philippines) Commercial Bank Corporation (18th April 2016) |
AK985792 G.R. No. 200693 |
Substituted service at a defendant's office is valid only upon strict proof of impossibility of prompt personal service and delivery to a competent person in charge thereof, meaning one managing the office or business; service on a mere property custodian after only two attempts on the same day does not confer jurisdiction. Personal service, by contrast, is completed by tendering the summons to a defendant who refuses to receive and sign for it. |
Civil Procedure — Service of Summons — Substituted Service Requirements and Jurisdiction over the Person |
|
|
Samahan ng Magsasaka at Mangingisda ng Sitio Naswe, Inc. vs. Tan (18th April 2016) |
AK841283 G.R. No. 196028 784 Phil. 727 |
Petitioner SAMMANA is an association of farmers and fishermen residing at Sitio Talaga, Barangay Ipag, Mariveles, Bataan. The disputed property is part of a 129.4227-hectare land in Barangay Ipag, Mariveles, Bataan, previously owned by Anchor Estate Corporation, which the PCGG had sequestered after identifying it as a dummy corporation of the late President Ferdinand E. Marcos. The property was included in the PCGG’s Invitation to Bid for its assets and was also subject to a CARP Notice of Coverage issued on June 16, 1994. Respondent Tomas Tan is the party who acquired a 34-hectare portion of the property through the PCGG’s privatization process. |
An association of farmers and fishermen lacks real-party-in-interest standing to challenge a DAR order lifting a CARP Notice of Coverage where its members have not been identified and registered as qualified beneficiaries, actually awarded portions of the land, or issued CLOAs; their interest is a mere expectancy. The DAR order also attained finality under Section 15 of E.O. No. 292 absent a timely appeal or motion for reconsideration. |
Agrarian Reform — Real Party-in-Interest — Notice of Coverage |
|
Divine Word College of Laoag vs. Mina (13th April 2016) |
AK196057 G.R. No. 195155 |
DWCL is a non-stock educational institution operated by the Society of Divine Word (SVD), which maintains the Society of Divine Word Educational Association (DWEA) Retirement Plan established in 1969. The plan contains a portability clause allowing members transferring between participating employers to carry earned service credits, subject to conditions including approval by both employers and notification to the Retirement Board. Delfin Mina began his employment with the SVD educational system in 1971 at the Academy of St. Joseph (ASJ), another member institution, before transferring to DWCL in 1979. After serving as a high school teacher and principal for over two decades, Mina was trans… |
An employee demoted without justification from a professional teaching position to a menial custodial role, divested of teaching responsibilities, and placed on a fixed-term contract subject to automatic termination, is constructively dismissed. The employer bears the burden of proving that a transfer is motivated by genuine business necessity and is not unreasonable, inconvenient, or prejudicial; failure to discharge this burden renders the transfer tantamount to unlawful constructive dismissal. |
Undetermined Labor Law — Constructive Dismissal — Backwages and Separation Pay Distinction — Retirement Benefits Portability |
|
Heirs of Feliciano Yambao vs. Heirs of Hermogenes Yambao (13th April 2016) |
AK312418 G.R. No. 194260 |
The subject property is a parcel of land in Barangay Bangan, Botolan, Zambales, originally possessed by Macaria De Ocampo. Macaria's nephew, Hermogenes Yambao, acted as administrator of the property and paid realty taxes therefor. Hermogenes had eight children: Ulpiano, Dominic, Teofilo, Feliciano, Asesclo, Delia, Amelia, and Melinda, all surnamed Yambao. After Hermogenes died, all of his heirs freely picked and harvested from fruit-bearing trees on the property, and Eleanor Yambao, Ulpiano's daughter, constructed a house thereon. Feliciano was eventually awarded a free patent over the property, for which Original Certificate of Title No. P-10737 was issued on November 29, 1989. |
An action for partition among co-owners is imprescriptible where the co-owners remain in actual possession of the property, and the issuance of a Torrens title in one co-owner's name creates an implied trust by operation of law that cannot be repudiated by reliance on the registration. Prescription begins to run against a co-owner only upon unequivocal acts of repudiation made known to the other co-owners, and even the issuance of a certificate of title—while constituting an open repudiation—does not start the prescriptive period if the other co-owners are still in actual possession of the property. |
Civil Law — Co-ownership — Partition — Prescription — Implied Trust in Torrens Title Registration |
|
Mariano vs. Martinez Memorial Colleges, Inc. (13th April 2016) |
AK284491 G.R. No. 194119 |
Martinez Memorial Colleges, Inc. (MMC) is a private educational institution located in Caloocan City, with Ferdinand A. Martinez as its incumbent President and Chief Executive and Dr. Elizabeth M. Del Rio as its Executive Vice-President. Sonia F. Mariano had been employed as MMC's Assistant Cashier since April 15, 1976—a tenure spanning 32 years—performing duties that included accepting payments, issuing receipts, and preparing bank deposit slips for MMC students. Her husband, Dario Mariano, served as MMC's Director for Finance, placing both spouses in the institution's finance hierarchy. |
An employee occupying a position of trust may be validly dismissed for loss of trust and confidence premised on dishonesty, provided the employer has reasonable ground to believe the employee is responsible for the misconduct, and the twin requirements of written notice and opportunity to be heard are satisfied. A transfer or reassignment pending investigation of alleged company-policy violations likewise falls within the ambit of management prerogative and does not constitute constructive dismissal when made in good faith and not as a penalty. |
Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Loss of Trust and Confidence — Management Prerogative — Transfer of Employee |
|
Nulada vs. Paulma (12th April 2016) |
AK189661 A.C. No. 8172 784 Phil. 309 |
Atty. Orlando S. Paulma, a member of the Sangguniang Bayan of Miagao, Iloilo, issued a check dated September 30, 2005 in the amount of P650,000.00 to Alex Nulada as payment for a personal debt. Nulada accepted the check based on Paulma's standing as a respected member of the community and public official. When presented for payment, the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite notice of dishonor and repeated demands, Paulma failed to make good the amount, prompting Nulada to file a criminal complaint for violation of BP 22. |
A lawyer's final conviction for violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (BP 22), which constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude, violates the lawyer's oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility, warranting suspension from the practice of law for two (2) years. |
Undetermined Legal Ethics — Disbarment — Violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (Bouncing Checks Law) — Crime Involving Moral Turpitude |
|
LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. vs. Agham Party List (12th April 2016) |
AK159032 G.R. No. 209165 |
LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. (LAMI), operator of a mining claim in Sta. Cruz, Zambales under Mineral Production Sharing Agreement No. 268-2008-III, secured multiple national permits to construct a private port facility in Brgy. Bolitoc approximately 25 kilometers from its mine site. The permits included a Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) dated 2 May 2011, a provisional foreshore lease agreement, Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) clearances, and a Tree Cutting Permit dated 17 April 2012 from the Community Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) for 37 trees. The project received support from the local barangay, munici… |
A Writ of Kalikasan will not issue absent proof of (1) an actual or threatened violation of the constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology arising from an unlawful act or omission, and (2) environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life, health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces, as the burden lies with the petitioner to substantiate these requisites through concrete evidence rather than general allegations. |
Undetermined Environmental Law — Writ of Kalikasan — Revised Forestry Code — Philippine Mining Act |
|
Consular Area Residents Association, Inc. vs. Casanova (12th April 2016) |
AK033551 G.R. No. 202618 |
The Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) is a government-owned and controlled corporation created under Republic Act No. 7227, the Bases Conversion and Development Act of 1992, to accelerate the conversion of military reservations into alternative productive uses and to raise funds through the sale of portions of Metro Manila military camps. Executive Order No. 40, Series of 1992, identified Fort Bonifacio as one of the military camps earmarked for development and disposition. Within Fort Bonifacio are the JUSMAG Area, a 34.5-hectare area along Lawton Avenue where military officers and their families occupied housing units originally constructed by the AFP, and the Diplomatic a… |
A petition denominated as one for prohibition but which ultimately seeks to permanently stop a demolition is essentially an action for injunction, and under Section 21 of RA 7227, only the Supreme Court may issue injunctions to restrain the implementation of military reservation conversion projects. However, a writ of injunction requires a clear and unmistakable right in esse; in its absence, the writ must not issue, and demolitions and evictions may be validly carried out without a judicial order when government infrastructure projects with available funding are about to be implemented pursuant to Section 28(b) of RA 7279. |
Administrative Law — Demolition and Eviction — Urban Development and Housing Act (RA 7279) — Right in Esse |
|
Pacquiao vs. Court of Tax Appeals (6th April 2016) |
AK022135 G.R. No. 213394 784 Phil. 220 CTA Case No. 8683 |
Emmanuel Pacquiao, a world-class professional boxer, and his spouse Jinkee Pacquiao derived income from both the Philippines and the United States. Prior to becoming public officials, Emmanuel earned substantial income from boxing purses in the US (primarily under Top Rank, Inc.) and from Philippine-sourced talent fees, product endorsements, and television appearances. The dispute arose from the Bureau of Internal Revenue's (BIR) investigation and assessment of deficiency income taxes and Value Added Tax (VAT) for taxable years 2008 and 2009, which the petitioners contested as having been issued in violation of procedural due process and based on unsubstantiated fraud allegations. |
The Court of Tax Appeals has the authority to dispense with or reduce the bond requirement under Section 11 of R.A. No. 1125 when the methods employed by the CIR in tax assessment and collection are patently illegal or not sanctioned by law; however, such determination requires a preliminary hearing and reception of evidence by the CTA to establish the existence of such illegality, which cannot be made by the Supreme Court on a Rule 65 petition without an evidentiary basis. |
Undetermined Taxation — Suspension of Collection of Deficiency Taxes — Bond Requirement under Section 11 of R.A. No. 1125 — Procedural Due Process in Tax Assessments |
Autozentrum Alabang, Inc. vs. Spouses Bernardo
8th June 2016
AK257770A seller commits a deceptive sales act under Article 50(c) of the Consumer Act of the Philippines when it represents a second-hand or pre-owned vehicle as brand new, new, original, or unused, and such representation may consist not only of words but also of deeds, acts, or silence amounting to suppression of material facts; consequently, the buyer may rescind the contract and demand full refund of the purchase price without deduction for depreciation.
Autozentrum Alabang, Inc., an authorized dealer of BMW vehicles, sold a 2008 BMW 320i sports car to Spouses Bernardo in November 2008 for P2,990,000, representing it as a brand new vehicle. Within less than a year, the vehicle experienced multiple mechanical failures including ABS brake system malfunctions, steering column defects, electrical system failures, air conditioning breakdowns, and fuel tank leaks. During repairs conducted by the service center, it was discovered that one of the tires lacked Running Flat Technology (RFT) which should have been standard for all tires, and the Land Transportation Office (LTO) registration revealed that Autozentrum was the previous registered owner o…
Facturan vs. Barcelona, Jr.
8th June 2016
AK520657A lawyer in government service who uses his public position to advance or protect the private interests of relatives or close associates by deliberately refusing to act on a criminal complaint and concealing case records violates Rule 6.02, Canon 6 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, notwithstanding that the misconduct occurred in the discharge of official duties as a prosecutor.
Complainant Ronaldo C. Facturan filed a complaint for qualified theft against Pilar Mendoza, Jose Sarcon, Elezar Barcelona, Rodrigo Arro, and Joseph Montero before the Provincial Prosecution Office of Alabel, Sarangani Province. The case was docketed as I.S. No. 04-211 and assigned to Prosecutor Faisal D. Amerkhan after respondent Prosecutor Alfredo L. Barcelona, Jr. inhibited himself. The respondents included respondent's cousin Elezar Barcelona and close friends. After conducting a preliminary investigation, Prosecutor Amerkhan forwarded the records to respondent on October 26, 2004, with a resolution recommending prosecution and a corresponding Information, requiring respondent's approva…
First Mega Holdings Corp. vs. Guiguinto Water District
8th June 2016
AK184745A government-owned or controlled corporation (GOCC) must secure the prior written conformity and acquiescence of the Office of the Government Corporate Counsel (OGCC) and the prior written concurrence of the Commission on Audit (COA) before engaging the services of private counsel, and the failure to comply with these requirements renders the representation defective and the proceedings void; however, the existence of an improper protest does not strip the NWRB of its authority to deny a water permit application based on the applicant's violation of the Water Code and operation in a critical area.
First Mega Holdings Corp. (petitioner) owned a gasoline station and commercial complex in Barangay Malis, Guiguinto, Bulacan. To supply water to these facilities, it intended to install a deep well. Guiguinto Water District (respondent) is a government-owned and controlled corporation responsible for water distribution in the municipality. The area of Guiguinto had been identified by the NWRB as one of the critical areas in Metro Manila and adjacent areas suffering from over-extraction of groundwater.
Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. vs. Sibya
8th June 2016
AK659025When an insured dies within the two-year contestability period, the insurer is absolutely bound to pay the policy proceeds even if the policy was obtained through fraudulent concealment or misrepresentation, as the death triggers the incontestability clause under Section 48 of the Insurance Code; moreover, concealment is an affirmative defense which the insurer must prove by satisfactory and convincing evidence, and the failure to disclose subsequent medical treatments does not constitute fraudulent concealment where the insured disclosed prior treatment for the same condition and authorized the insurer to investigate.
Atty. Jesus Sibya, Jr. applied for life insurance with Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. on January 10, 2001. In his application, he disclosed that he had undergone lithotripsy for kidney stones in 1987 at the National Kidney Institute under Dr. Jesus Benjamin Mendoza, but indicated "no recurrence." Sun Life approved the application and issued Policy No. 031097335 on February 5, 2001, naming respondents as beneficiaries entitled to ₱1,000,000.00 in death benefits. Atty. Jesus Jr. died from a gunshot wound on May 11, 2001, merely three months after the policy issuance.
Burgos vs. Naval
8th June 2016
AK729043Only the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) possesses the legal authority to represent the People of the Philippines in appeals or special civil actions for certiorari involving the criminal aspect of a case before the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals; a private complainant may not prosecute such actions in the name of the People without OSG authorization, though he may independently pursue remedies limited to the preservation of civil liability.
Jose Burgos, Jr. and his wife, Rubie S. Garcia-Burgos, were the registered owners of a 1,389-square-meter lot in Taytay, Rizal, covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. 550579. After mortgaging the property to Antonio Assad in 1996, the spouses sought a loan from respondents Spouses Eladio and Arlina Naval to avoid foreclosure. The Navals allegedly required the spouses to sign blank documents as a condition for the loan.
Province of Antique vs. Calabocal
8th June 2016
AK362669A boundary dispute under the Local Government Code exists when a portion or the whole of a local government unit’s territorial area is claimed by two or more local government units; the mandatory administrative settlement procedure need not be exhausted where one party’s categorical refusal to participate makes compliance impossible or futile, thus permitting direct judicial action.
In the late 1970s, the mayor of Bulalacao, Oriental Mindoro, orally lent the administration of Liwagao Island, a 114-hectare island situated between Oriental Mindoro and Antique, to the mayor of Caluya, Antique, on condition that the island would be returned upon the end of either official’s term. After both mayors’ terms ended in 1987, Caluya continued to exercise authority over the island. Oriental Mindoro passed resolutions asserting its jurisdictional rights and, in 2012, called for a joint session of the two provincial sanggunians to settle the dispute amicably. Antique initially indicated willingness but subsequently issued Resolution No. 142-2012, declaring it was not amenable to any…
Eustaquio vs. Navales
8th June 2016
AK687823A lawyer who continues to discharge the functions of a government position requiring authority to practice law, despite a final and executory order of suspension from the practice of law, is guilty of willful disobedience to a lawful order of a superior court and of willfully appearing as an attorney without authority, warranting further suspension under Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court.
Complainants spouses Lamberto V. Eustaquio and Gloria J. Eustaquio owned an apartment at 4-D Cavite St., Barangay Paltok, SFDM, Quezon City, which they leased to respondent Atty. Edgar R. Navales under a Contract of Lease dated April 16, 2005. Respondent was a member of the Philippine Bar who, during the pendency of the administrative case against him, was appointed as an Assistant City Public Prosecutor of Quezon City — a position requiring the authority to practice law under Section 9 of Republic Act No. 10071, the "Prosecution Service Act of 2010."
Otamias vs. Republic
8th June 2016
AK794454A statutory exemption from execution of pension benefits may be waived by the retiree through a Deed of Assignment granting a portion of his retirement benefits to his family for support, provided the waiver is not contrary to law, public policy, morals, or good customs, and does not prejudice a third person with a recognized legal right.
Edna Mabugay-Otamias and retired Colonel Francisco B. Otamias were married on June 16, 1978 and had five children. They separated in September 2000 due to his alleged infidelity, with the children remaining with Edna. Colonel Otamias retired from military service on April 1, 2003, his pension constituting his sole source of income. The dispute centers on whether AFP retirement pension benefits, statutorily exempt from execution under Section 31 of Presidential Decree No. 1638, may be reached by a writ of execution for family support when the retiree himself executed a Deed of Assignment waiving a portion thereof in favor of his legitimate family.
Dio vs. People
8th June 2016
AK174372A defect in an information arising from failure to allege facts constituting an offense — including failure to establish venue in a libel case — is curable by amendment before arraignment, and the prosecution must be given the opportunity to amend before the information may be quashed. The proscription against amendments that operate to vest jurisdiction in the trial court applies only where the accused has already been arraigned under a defective information.
Private respondent Timothy Desmond is the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Subic Bay Marine Exploratorium, while petitioner Virginia Dio serves as Treasurer and Member of the Board of Directors of the same corporation. The relationship between the parties as corporate officers of the same entity provides the context for the allegedly defamatory electronic messages that gave rise to the libel charges. The informations were filed under Article 355 of the Revised Penal Code, which punishes libel by means of writings or similar means, at a time when Republic Act No. 10175 (the Anti-Cybercrime Law) had not yet been enacted.
Interport Resources Corp. vs. Securities Specialist, Inc.
6th June 2016
AK041544The assignment of stock subscription agreements operates as a novation by substitution of debtor under Article 1293 of the Civil Code, requiring the corporation to recognize the assignee as the new subscriber entitled to pay the balance and receive the shares, notwithstanding the lack of registration in the stock and transfer book when the corporation has unduly refused to recognize the transfer; however, exemplary damages and attorney's fees may not be awarded solely on the basis of bad faith absent a showing of wanton, fraudulent, oppressive, or malevolent conduct.
In 1978, Oceanic Oil & Mineral Resources, Inc. merged with Interport Resources Corporation, with Interport as the surviving entity. Prior to the merger, R.C. Lee had subscribed to 5,000,000 shares of Oceanic stock, paying only 25% of the subscription price. In 1979, R.C. Lee assigned these subscription agreements to Securities Specialist, Inc. (SSI) through stock assignments indorsed in blank. A decade later, when Interport called for the payment of subscription balances, it refused to recognize SSI's rights despite the prior assignment, leading to a dispute over ownership of the shares and the validity of the transfer under the Corporation Code and Civil Code provisions on novation.
Navarra vs. People of the Philippines
6th June 2016
AK037797The mere act of issuing a worthless check constitutes a malum prohibitum offense punishable under Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 regardless of the purpose for which the check was issued or whether it was intended merely as a guarantee or condition for loan restructuring, and corporate officers who actually sign bouncing checks in behalf of the corporation are personally liable for the offense, with their criminal liability fused with the civil liability of the corporation under Section 1 of the law.
Reynolds Philippines Corporation (Reynolds) maintained a banking relationship with Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC), which had extended to Reynolds a loan line of ₱82 million and a foreign exchange line of ₱900,000.00. As part of its loan obligations, Reynolds issued several promissory notes to HSBC. Subsequently, Reynolds, through its Chief Finance Officer Jorge B. Navarra and Vice-President for Corporate Affairs George Molina, issued seven Asia Trust checks totaling ₱45.2 million purportedly to cover its outstanding loan obligations. Upon presentment on July 11, 2000, all seven checks were dishonored for being "Drawn Against Insufficient Funds." Despite notices of dishonor…
Fyfe vs. Philippine Airlines, Inc.
6th June 2016
AK226430The proper remedy from an order of the Regional Trial Court vacating, confirming, correcting, or modifying a domestic arbitral award under the Arbitration Law (R.A. 876) is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, not an ordinary appeal under Rule 41, because Section 29 of the Arbitration Law limits the appeal to questions of law. The Court also held that a suspension order issued by the SEC in rehabilitation proceedings deprives all other tribunals, including arbitration panels, of jurisdiction to hear claims for payment against the distressed corporation.
The respondent, Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL), underwent rehabilitation proceedings in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in 1998, which issued an order dated July 1, 1998 suspending all claims for payment against it. To convince its creditors to approve its rehabilitation plan, PAL hired technical advisers with experience in the airline industry, leading to the formation of Regent Star Services Ltd. (Regent Star) and the execution of a Technical Services Agreement (TSA) with PAL. The TSA contained an arbitration clause providing for dispute resolution through the Philippine Dispute Resolution Center, Inc. (PDRCI).
Sugarsteel Industrial, Inc. and Mr. Ben Yapjoco vs. Victor Albina, Vicente Uy and Alex Velasquez
6th June 2016
AK057698In a special civil action for certiorari, the Court of Appeals may pass upon the evidence and review the NLRC's factual findings when they are not supported by substantial evidence, because an NLRC decision not supported by substantial evidence is tainted with grave abuse of discretion. Dismissal for neglect under Article 282(b) of the Labor Code requires the negligence to be both gross and habitual; a single or isolated act of negligence does not constitute just cause.
Sugarsteel Industrial, Inc. employed Victor Albina, Vicente Uy, and Alex Velasquez as kettleman, assistant kettleman, and inspector, respectively; Ben Yapjoco was its manager. The employment relationship and the Labor Code's rules on appeals from the Labor Arbiter to the NLRC under Article 223 and on dismissal for gross and habitual neglect under Article 282(b) provide the statutory backdrop for the dispute.
Roman, Jr. vs. Securities and Exchange Commission
1st June 2016
AK892411The Securities and Exchange Commission retains administrative, regulatory, and supervisory jurisdiction to investigate complaints alleging violations of the Securities Regulation Code, even if such complaints incidentally raise intra-corporate matters, and may constitute a management committee as an implied power necessary to carry out its express supervisory functions.
Minority shareholders of Capitol Hills Golf and Country Club, Inc. filed a verified letter-complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission alleging that the corporation’s president, Pablo B. Roman, Jr., and other officers committed fraud, misrepresentation, and gross mismanagement in connection with transactions involving Ayala Land Inc. The shareholders claimed that the officers concealed unauthorized cash advances, misrepresented the status of a golf course development, and caused financial losses, wastage, and dissipation of corporate funds. The complaint prayed for an SEC investigation into the alleged irregularities and for the creation of a management committee to temporarily ov…
Kho vs. Republic of the Philippines
1st June 2016
AK817708A certification from the Local Civil Registrar attesting to the absence of a marriage license in its records is adequate to prove the non-issuance of said license, thereby overcoming the presumption of validity of marriage and shifting the burden to the party alleging validity to prove that the license was secured. Failure to produce the license renders the marriage void ab initio.
Raquel G. Kho and Veronica B. Kho were married on June 1, 1972, in Arteche, Eastern Samar. Their marriage was celebrated prior to the effectivity of the Family Code, thus governed by the Civil Code. The dispute centers on whether their marriage was solemnized with the requisite marriage license, an essential requisite under Article 53 of the Civil Code.
Calimag vs. Heirs of Macapaz
1st June 2016
AK460391A certificate of live birth, as a public document, is prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein, including the marriage of the parents and the legitimate filiation of children born during such union, and the signature of the father is not required for the registration of a legitimate child's birth under Section 5 of Act No. 3753. The presumption of validity of marriage (semper praesumitur pro matrimonio) applies where parties openly cohabited as husband and wife, and such presumption, combined with birth certificates declaring the parents' marriage date and place, suffices to establish legitimate filiation even without the marriage certificate itself.
Virginia D. Calimag co-owned a 299-square-meter property in Makati City with Silvestra N. Macapaz under TCT No. 183088. Silvestra died without issue on November 11, 2002. The respondents—Anastacio P. Macapaz, Jr. and Alicia Macapaz-Ritua—are the children of Silvestra's brother, Anastacio Macapaz, Sr., and Fidela O. Poblete Vda. de Macapaz. An adverse claim by Fidela over a 49.5-square-meter portion of the property was annotated on the title. The dispute centers on whether the respondents, as heirs of Silvestra's brother, have legal standing to annul a deed of sale that petitioner used to cancel the co-owned title and consolidate ownership in her name, and whether Article 992 of the Civil Co…
Stronghold Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Pamana Island Resort Hotel and Marina Club, Inc.
1st June 2016
AK444371A final and executory judgment may not be modified during execution, even to correct the computation of interest, except only for clerical errors, nunc pro tunc entries causing no prejudice, or void judgments; and the penalty interest under Section 243 of the Insurance Code is computed at double the BSP-prescribed rate for loans or forbearance of money, applied prospectively from the effectivity of any BSP circular changing that rate.
Pamana Island Resort Hotel and Marina Club, Inc. engaged Flowtech Construction Corporation to construct a project on Pamana Island, Subic Bay. Flowtech obtained a Contractor's All Risk Bond in the amount of ₱9,047,960.14 from Stronghold Insurance Company, Inc. to secure the construction. Section 243 of the Insurance Code governs the timeliness of payment of insurance claims and prescribes a penalty of interest at double the ceiling prescribed by the Monetary Board for failure or refusal to pay within the periods stated therein.
People vs. Molina
1st June 2016
AK411849The elements of illegal recruitment in large scale under Article 13(b) of the Labor Code and Section 6 of R.A. No. 8042 are: (1) the offender has no valid license or authority required by law to lawfully engage in recruitment and placement of workers; (2) the offender undertakes any of the activities within the meaning of "recruitment and placement" under Article 13(b) of the Labor Code, or any of the prohibited practices enumerated under Article 34 of the said Code (now Section 6 of R.A. 8042); and (3) the offender committed the same against three or more persons, individually or as a group. A holder of a license or authority may still be liable for illegal recruitment under Section 6 …
Delia Molina was the President of Southern Cotabato Landbase Management Corporation (SCLMC), a recruitment agency registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). The SCLMC's license to conduct business was temporarily suspended by the POEA during April and May 2006, the period alleged in the Informations, and the suspension was lifted on July 31, 2006. The SCLMC had no job order for Korea, as only seven agencies were allowed to deploy workers to Korea at that time.
Atty. Romeo G. Roxas vs. Republic Real Estate Corporation
1st June 2016
AK967342A final and executory judgment is immutable and unalterable, and neither the trial court nor the sheriff may, through a writ of execution or notice purporting to implement it, directly or indirectly alter its terms. The sheriff's execution of judgment is a purely ministerial phase of adjudication, and the sheriff must strictly conform to the letter of the dispositive portion of the judgment.
Republic Real Estate Corporation (RREC) entered into a reclamation agreement with Pasay City in 1959, authorized by Pasay City Council Ordinances No. 121 and No. 158, to reclaim 300 hectares of foreshore lands along Manila Bay. The Republic sued to nullify the agreement, and in Republic vs. Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court declared the agreement and ordinances null and void as ultra vires and contrary to Republic Act No. 1899, but awarded RREC and Pasay City P10,926,071.29 plus 6% interest per annum from May 1, 1962, based on quantum meruit. The present consolidated petitions arise from RREC's repeated attempts to relitigate and inflate that final award, and from the counsel dispute be…
Ricafort vs. Medina
31st May 2016
AK640301A lawyer who publicly humiliates another by slapping him on the face, coupled with an arrogant assertion of status, violates Canon 7, Rule 7.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and is subject to suspension, such conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice and discrediting the legal profession.
Dionnie Ricafort was a tricycle driver in Surigao City. Atty. Rene O. Medina was a member of the Bar and, at the time of the incident, a provincial board member of Surigao del Norte. The two had no prior professional or transactional relationship; their encounter arose solely from a traffic incident on a public street.
Capitol Wireless, Inc. vs. Provincial Treasurer of Batangas
30th May 2016
AK786051Submarine communications cables may be classified as taxable real property (as "machinery") under the Local Government Code to the extent they are located within the taxing authority's jurisdiction, and factual disputes regarding the extent of such property within the jurisdiction, the nature of ownership, and the corresponding assessment must first be brought before the Local Board of Assessment Appeals (LBAA) and Central Board of Assessment Appeals (CBAA) before resort to judicial action.
Capwire is a Philippine corporation engaged in international telecommunications, co-owning submarine cable systems connecting various countries. It claimed ownership only of the "Wet Segment" (submerged portions) while alleging that landing stations in Nasugbu, Batangas were owned by PLDT. For loan restructuring, Capwire submitted a Sworn Statement of True Value of Real Properties to the Provincial Treasurer of Batangas, listing values for various cable systems. The Provincial Assessor subsequently issued Assessments of Real Property (ARP), treating the cables as taxable real property.
Magallanes Watercraft Association, Inc. vs. Auguis
30th May 2016
AK062760A corporation possesses not only express powers conferred by law or its articles of incorporation, but also implied powers necessary or incidental to the exercise of those expressly conferred; an act reasonably necessary or proper to promote the interest or welfare of the corporation, and logically related to its corporate purpose, is not ultra vires even if not expressly provided in the charter or by-laws.
The dispute arises from the enforcement of membership obligations within a local association of motorized banca operators. It addresses the scope of corporate powers of non-stock corporations, particularly whether disciplinary measures such as the suspension of membership privileges for non-payment of dues fall within the corporation's powers when not explicitly enumerated in its governing documents.
Bradford United Church of Christ, Inc. vs. Ando
30th May 2016
AK554120The simultaneous pendency of an action for recovery of ownership does not bar the filing or maintenance of a summary action for unlawful detainer concerning the same property, provided the causes of action are distinct—unlawful detainer being limited to the question of physical or material possession (possession de facto) independent of ownership claims, while recovery of ownership concerns dominical rights and title.
BUCCI and respondents (members of the Mandaue Bradford Church Council, the Mandaue Bradford Church, and the United Church of Christ in the Philippines, Inc.) disputed possession and ownership of Lot 3-F in Mandaue City. Prior to the filing of the unlawful detainer case, the respondents had initiated Civil Case No. MAN-1669 before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) for recovery of ownership with preliminary injunction over Lot 3-F and another parcel (Lot 3-C). On October 13, 1997, the RTC rendered judgment in favor of BUCCI in that ownership case, but the respondents filed a motion for reconsideration that remained pending resolution until March 10, 2005. During the pendency of this motion for r…
Republic vs. Rayos Del Sol
30th May 2016
AK686993Tax declarations, though not conclusive evidence of ownership, constitute proof of a claim of title and serve as sufficient basis for inferring possession in the concept of an owner; when coupled with credible testimonial evidence establishing possession since June 12, 1945 or earlier, they satisfy the requirements for original registration of imperfect title under Section 14(1) of P.D. No. 1529.
Felipe Del Sol cultivated Lot 8173-A in Barangay Ligid Tipas, Taguig during his lifetime until his death on July 2, 1932. His son, Jose Rayos Del Sol, continued farming the land until his death on September 25, 1953. The respondents, children of Jose and grandchildren of Felipe, inherited the property and continued possession through tenants. The land, part of the alienable and disposable public domain per L.C. Map No. 2623 certified on January 3, 1968, was declared for taxation purposes as early as 1948.
Abayon vs. HRET and Daza
3rd May 2016
AK996869An election tribunal may annul election results on the ground of terrorism only upon clear and convincing proof that (1) the illegality affected more than fifty percent (50%) of the votes cast in the contested precincts, and (2) it is impossible to distinguish with reasonable certainty between lawful and unlawful ballots. The HRET’s annulment of elections, unsupported by such evidence, constitutes grave abuse of discretion.
In the May 13, 2013 elections for Representative of the First Legislative District of Northern Samar, petitioner Harlin C. Abayon obtained 72,857 votes while private respondent Raul A. Daza received 72,805 votes—a difference of 52 votes. Abayon was proclaimed the winner on May 17, 2013.
Philippine National Bank vs. Spouses Rivera
20th April 2016
AK828285A complaint for annulment of sheriff's sale sufficiently states a cause of action when it alleges that the mortgagor had fully paid the mortgage obligation and was not properly notified of the auction sale, as these allegations, if hypothetically admitted, demonstrate a violation of the mortgagor's rights that warrants annulment of the foreclosure sale.
The case involves a real estate mortgage executed by Spouses Rivera in favor of Philippine National Bank (PNB) to secure housing loans and a revolving credit line. Following default, PNB initiated extrajudicial foreclosure proceedings, leading to a public auction sale of the mortgaged property where PNB emerged as the highest bidder. The spouses subsequently sought to annul the sale, claiming they had fully satisfied their obligation and were deprived of proper notice due to the bank's failure to send notice to their correct address despite contractual stipulations.
Fajardo vs. Alvarez
20th April 2016
AK374380A government lawyer authorized to engage in private practice under Section 7(b)(2) of Republic Act No. 6713 nonetheless commits unauthorized practice when such representation conflicts with or tends to conflict with official functions, particularly when the lawyer represents a private client against a government office such as the Ombudsman. Furthermore, a lawyer who implies to a client that favorable decisions can be obtained through personal connections with adjudicators engages in influence peddling that violates Canons 1, 7, and 13 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and warrants severe disciplinary sanctions.
Teresita P. Fajardo served as the Municipal Treasurer of San Leonardo, Nueva Ecija. In 2008, the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for Luzon issued a decision finding her guilty of serious dishonesty and ordering her dismissal from service, along with a resolution recommending her indictment for violation of Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019 (the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act). Facing these administrative and criminal charges, Fajardo sought legal assistance.
Victoria vs. Pidlaoan
20th April 2016
AK385708A deed of donation executed to avoid tax liabilities is relatively simulated when the parties' contemporaneous and subsequent acts demonstrate an intent to effect an absolute sale, and the parties are bound by their real agreement as disclosed by their conduct and admissions, notwithstanding the presumption of regularity attaching to notarized documents.
Elma Pidlaoan purchased a 201-square-meter lot in Lucena City in 1984, registered solely in her name under Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-50282. Her partner, Rosario Victoria, constructed a house on the lot but subsequently left for Saudi Arabia. In 1989, Elma mortgaged the property to secure a loan. When foreclosure loomed, Elma sought financial assistance from her sister-in-law, Eufemia Pidlaoan, who arranged for her daughter, Normita Jacob Pidlaoan, to lend Elma the redemption amount. Unable to repay the loan, Elma offered to sell the property to Normita. The parties initially executed an unnotarized deed of sale, but upon a notary public's advice to avoid capital gains tax, t…
Domingo vs. Molina
20th April 2016
AK692999Upon the death of a spouse, the conjugal partnership of gains is dissolved and an implied co-ownership arises among the surviving spouse and the heirs of the deceased pending liquidation and partition, entitling the surviving spouse to freely alienate his undivided interest in the conjugal property but obligating him to hold in trust for the other co-heirs any portion exceeding his share, which may only be recovered through an action for partition.
Spouses Anastacio and Flora Domingo, married prior to the effectivity of the Family Code, acquired a one-half undivided portion of a parcel of land in Camiling, Tarlac in 1951 as conjugal property. Flora died in 1968, leaving Anastacio and their children as heirs. In 1978, Anastacio executed a sale of his interest over the property to the spouses Genaro and Elena Molina to satisfy his debts. The sale was annotated on the Original Certificate of Title and later registered in 1995 under Transfer Certificate of Title No. 272967 in the names of the spouses Molina.
Malayan Insurance Company, Inc. vs. Alibudbud
20th April 2016
AK631271A complaint for replevin rooted in a promissory note and a deed of chattel mortgage executed by an employee under a company car financing plan is a civil action over which the regular courts have jurisdiction; the cause of action arises from a debtor-creditor relationship, not from the employer-employee relationship, even though the plan was availed of as an incident of employment.
Diana P. Alibudbud was hired by Malayan Insurance Company, Inc. as Senior Vice President for its Sales Department on July 5, 2004. As part of her employment benefits, she availed of Malayan’s Car Financing Plan and was issued a Honda Civic sedan. She simultaneously executed a promissory note and a deed of chattel mortgage in Malayan’s favor, undertaking to pay the loan in monthly installments, with a stipulation that the entire remaining balance would become immediately due and the vehicle surrenderable if she left the company within three years. On July 18, 2005, Malayan dismissed Alibudbud on the ground of redundancy, triggering the acceleration clause. When she refused to surrender the c…
People of the Philippines vs. Lipata
20th April 2016
AK582064The death of the accused pending appeal of his conviction, occurring before final judgment, totally extinguishes his criminal liability and civil liability ex delicto; any surviving civil liability predicated on a source of obligation other than delict—such as quasi-delict—must be pursued through a separate civil action, which the offended party must institute independently of the criminal proceedings.
Appellant Gerry Lipata y Ortiza was charged with Murder for the fatal stabbing of Rolando Cueno on 1 September 2005 in Quezon City, allegedly committed in conspiracy with his brothers Larry and Rudy Lipata. The case was tried in the RTC, appealed to the CA, and then elevated to the Supreme Court. During the pendency of the appeal before the Supreme Court, it was discovered that appellant had died on 13 February 2011 while confined at the Quezon City Jail—months before the CA promulgated its decision on 31 May 2011. This procedural anomaly required the Court to determine the effect of appellant's pre-judgment death on both his criminal and civil liabilities, and whether the victim's heirs co…
Tulio vs. Atty. Buhangin
20th April 2016
AK771486A lawyer is prohibited from representing new clients whose interests oppose those of a former client in any manner, whether or not they are parties in the same action or on totally unrelated cases.
Arthur S. Tulio engaged the services of Atty. Gregory F. Buhangin, initially as a surveyor for his mother's estate and later as legal counsel. Atty. Buhangin prepared and notarized a Deed of Waiver of Rights executed by Tulio's siblings in favor of Tulio, and subsequently represented Tulio in a specific performance case involving the property. The dispute arose when Atty. Buhangin later represented Tulio's siblings to rescind the very deed he prepared.
Blue Eagle Management, Inc. vs. Naval
19th April 2016
AK346250Voluntary resignation is established where an employee, faced with imminent retrenchment due to substantial business losses proven by audited financial statements, executes a resignation letter in her own handwriting and accepts enhanced separation benefits, absent clear proof of coercion, fraud, or unconscionable terms.
Petitioner Blue Eagle Management, Inc. (BEMI) is a domestic corporation organized in 2004 to operate the Moro Lorenzo Sports Center (MLSC) within the Ateneo de Manila University compound under a Memorandum of Agreement. BEMI commenced operations on January 2, 2005, absorbing all employees of the previous operator. In its first year, BEMI suffered net losses of P3,293,816.14, with gross profits insufficient to cover administrative expenses, particularly salaries. Respondent Jocelyn L. Naval was hired as maintenance staff on January 15, 2005. In December 2005, an incident occurred wherein a regular gym customer, Dr. Florendo, allegedly berated Naval after an argument involving referees at the…
William Go Que Construction and/or William Go Que vs. Court of Appeals and Danny Singson, Rodolfo Pasaqui, Lendo Lominiqui, and Jun Andales
19th April 2016
AK620854The photocopies of private subdivision identification cards and a joint affidavit of co-parties do not constitute competent evidence of identity under the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, and the CA gravely abused its discretion in treating them as substantial compliance with the requirements of verification and certification against forum shopping. Competent evidence of identity requires either at least one current identification document issued by an official agency bearing the photograph and signature of the individual, or the oath or affirmation of one credible witness not privy to the instrument who is personally known to the notary public and personally knows the individual, or of…
Private respondents Danny Singson, Rodolfo Pasaqui, Lendo Lominiqui, and Jun Andales were workers who filed illegal dismissal complaints against petitioner William Go Que Construction and/or William Go Que before the National Labor Relations Commission. The dispute arose from petitioner's allegation that the workers stole unused steel bars from the construction site, which led to their separation from employment. The procedural requirements of verification and certification against forum shopping under the Rules of Court, in relation to the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice, became the central legal framework governing the dispute's progress through the appellate courts.
Philcomsat Holdings Corporation vs. Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Atty. Sikini C. Labastilla
19th April 2016
AK719938A lawyer who causes or participates in the creation of a checkbook entry imputing corrupt motives against a court violates Canons 7 and 11 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and is subject to suspension from the practice of law, as such conduct undermines the dignity and authority of the courts and erodes public confidence in the judicial institution.
Complainant PHILCOMSAT Holdings Corporation, represented by its director and treasurer Erlinda I. Bildner, filed an administrative complaint before the Commission on Bar Discipline of the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) against respondents Atty. Luis K. Lokin, Jr. and Atty. Sikini C. Labastilla. Atty. Lokin, Jr. was a director of PHILCOMSAT who had control and management of the company's financial records, while Atty. Labastilla served as the company's external counsel in an injunction case against Philippine Overseas Telecommunications Corporation (POTC) before the Sandiganbayan. The complaint sought disbarment for insinuating that the Sandiganbayan received P2,000,000.00 in exchan…
Legaspi vs. COMELEC
19th April 2016
AK457415A motion for reconsideration before the COMELEC en banc is an incidental matter; if the COMELEC en banc fails to muster the required four votes, the motion is deemed denied and the COMELEC Division's ruling stands. The Mendoza doctrine, which allowed dismissal of the entire original action upon such failure, is unconstitutional for circumventing the four-vote requirement and diminishing the adjudicatory powers of the COMELEC Divisions.
Feliciano Legaspi, Alfredo D. Germar, and Rogelio P. Santos, Jr. were candidates in the May 13, 2013 elections in Norzagaray, Bulacan, with Legaspi and Germar running for mayor and Santos for councilor. Under Sec. 3, Art. IX-C of the 1987 Constitution, the COMELEC may sit en banc or in two divisions, and all election cases shall be heard and decided in division, provided that motions for reconsideration of decisions shall be decided by the Commission en banc. Sec. 7, Art. IX-A requires each Commission to decide by a majority vote of all its Members, and Sec. 6, Rule 18 of the COMELEC Rules of Procedure governs the procedure when the en banc is equally divided or the necessary majority canno…
Republic vs. Regulto
18th April 2016
AK032018A legal easement of right-of-way exists in favor of the government over land originally granted by free patent under the Public Land Act, which subsists even after transfer to private owners and is not subject to any time limitation; however, when the enforcement of such easement results in material impairment of the value of the remaining property (such as when more than half of the property is appropriated for public use), the government must pay just compensation for the remaining area under the principles of eminent domain.
Spouses Ildefonso and Francia Regulto acquired a 300-square-meter residential lot in Mabel, Naga City by virtue of a deed of absolute sale executed in February 1994. The property was originally part of a 7,759-square-meter tract granted by free patent under Commonwealth Act No. 141 and registered under Original Certificate of Title No. 235 dated April 14, 1956. In April 2011, the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) commenced construction of the Naga City-Milaor Bypass Road, which would traverse 162 square meters of the spouses' property, initially offering P243,000.00 as just compensation but subsequently withdrawing the offer based on the claim that the property was subject to a…
Castillo vs. De Leon Castillo
18th April 2016
AK080327Under the Civil Code, a judicial declaration of nullity is not required to establish the invalidity of a void marriage, and a party may contract a subsequent valid marriage without such decree provided the first marriage is void ab initio; this rule applies to marriages celebrated before the effectivity of the Family Code on 3 August 1988, notwithstanding the contrary requirement under Article 40 of the Family Code.
On 25 May 1972, respondent Lea P. De Leon Castillo married Benjamin Bautista. On 6 January 1979, she contracted a second marriage with petitioner Renato A. Castillo. The parties had three children born in 1979, 1981, and 1985. In 2001, Renato initiated proceedings to declare the second marriage null, alleging that Lea's prior subsisting marriage rendered their union bigamous and void.
Bacolor vs. VL Makabali Memorial Hospital, Inc.
18th April 2016
AK464591A certificate against forum shopping signed by some, but not all, petitioners substantially complies with the Rules when all petitioners share a common interest and invoke a common cause of action; verification is substantially complied with when at least one petitioner with sufficient knowledge signs. Procedural rules must be liberally construed to serve substantial justice, particularly when the labor arbiter and the NLRC reach conflicting findings.
Six resident physicians—Drs. Lynman Bacolor, Jeffrey Galura, Helen Torres, Fritzie Villegas, Raymond Canlas, and Zheila Torres—together with Dr. Dax Tidula, filed an amended complaint for illegal dismissal and money claims against VL Makabali Memorial Hospital, Inc., its owner/president Alejandro Makabali, and ER Manager Melchor Catambing. They alleged that after their fixed-term contracts expired, they continued to be employed but were later told to resign and re-apply under one-year contracts. Upon refusal, they were demoted to assistant physicians in the operating room. Some were charged with rule violations; Drs. Bacolor and Galura received termination notices. The Labor Arbiter found i…
Insular Life Assurance Company, Ltd. vs. Khu
18th April 2016
AK263945The date of last reinstatement under Section 48 of the Insurance Code pertains to the date the insurer approved the application for reinstatement; however, where the insurer's own reinstatement documents contain ambiguous language regarding the effective date of reinstatement, the ambiguity must be resolved in favor of the insured, and the reinstatement is reckoned from the date favorable to the insured.
Felipe N. Khu, Sr. procured a life insurance policy from The Insular Life Assurance Company, Ltd. under its Diamond Jubilee Insurance Plan, with a face value of ₱1,000,000.00, effective June 22, 1997. The policy lapsed on June 23, 1999 for non-payment of premium, after which Felipe sought reinstatement. The reinstatement process involved a Letter of Acceptance and an Endorsement — both pro-forma documents prepared by Insular Life — which contained the phrase "effective June 22, 1999" whose referent was ambiguous. The legal framework governing the dispute is Section 48 of the Insurance Code (Presidential Decree No. 612), which bars an insurer from rescinding a life insurance policy on the gr…
Robina Farms Cebu/Universal Robina Corporation vs. Villa
18th April 2016
AK883607An employer's act of advising an employee to resign with a request for financial assistance, preventing her re-entry after a suspension, confiscating her gate pass, and informing her she has been replaced constitutes illegal dismissal, notwithstanding the employee's prior application for an early retirement program whose benefits were never approved at the rate she expected. The employee's application for retirement does not manifest voluntary intent to sever the employment relationship where her consent was obtained under the mistaken belief that she would receive a higher benefit, and the employer never actually approved the retirement at the offered rate.
Elizabeth Villa had been employed by Robina Farms Cebu, a division of Universal Robina Corporation, as a sales clerk since August 1981. In the latter part of 2001, the petitioner offered a special retirement program to employees who had served at least ten years, and Villa applied for retirement under that program, expecting benefits equivalent to 86% of her salary rate for every year of service. The petitioner's management did not approve the benefits at the rate Villa applied for, offering instead only half-month pay for every year of service, and advised her to tender a resignation with a request for financial assistance if she wished to pursue retirement. The dispute arose from the inte…
Ang vs. Chinatrust (Philippines) Commercial Bank Corporation
18th April 2016
AK985792Substituted service at a defendant's office is valid only upon strict proof of impossibility of prompt personal service and delivery to a competent person in charge thereof, meaning one managing the office or business; service on a mere property custodian after only two attempts on the same day does not confer jurisdiction. Personal service, by contrast, is completed by tendering the summons to a defendant who refuses to receive and sign for it.
Samahan ng Magsasaka at Mangingisda ng Sitio Naswe, Inc. vs. Tan
18th April 2016
AK841283An association of farmers and fishermen lacks real-party-in-interest standing to challenge a DAR order lifting a CARP Notice of Coverage where its members have not been identified and registered as qualified beneficiaries, actually awarded portions of the land, or issued CLOAs; their interest is a mere expectancy. The DAR order also attained finality under Section 15 of E.O. No. 292 absent a timely appeal or motion for reconsideration.
Petitioner SAMMANA is an association of farmers and fishermen residing at Sitio Talaga, Barangay Ipag, Mariveles, Bataan. The disputed property is part of a 129.4227-hectare land in Barangay Ipag, Mariveles, Bataan, previously owned by Anchor Estate Corporation, which the PCGG had sequestered after identifying it as a dummy corporation of the late President Ferdinand E. Marcos. The property was included in the PCGG’s Invitation to Bid for its assets and was also subject to a CARP Notice of Coverage issued on June 16, 1994. Respondent Tomas Tan is the party who acquired a 34-hectare portion of the property through the PCGG’s privatization process.
Divine Word College of Laoag vs. Mina
13th April 2016
AK196057An employee demoted without justification from a professional teaching position to a menial custodial role, divested of teaching responsibilities, and placed on a fixed-term contract subject to automatic termination, is constructively dismissed. The employer bears the burden of proving that a transfer is motivated by genuine business necessity and is not unreasonable, inconvenient, or prejudicial; failure to discharge this burden renders the transfer tantamount to unlawful constructive dismissal.
DWCL is a non-stock educational institution operated by the Society of Divine Word (SVD), which maintains the Society of Divine Word Educational Association (DWEA) Retirement Plan established in 1969. The plan contains a portability clause allowing members transferring between participating employers to carry earned service credits, subject to conditions including approval by both employers and notification to the Retirement Board. Delfin Mina began his employment with the SVD educational system in 1971 at the Academy of St. Joseph (ASJ), another member institution, before transferring to DWCL in 1979. After serving as a high school teacher and principal for over two decades, Mina was trans…
Heirs of Feliciano Yambao vs. Heirs of Hermogenes Yambao
13th April 2016
AK312418An action for partition among co-owners is imprescriptible where the co-owners remain in actual possession of the property, and the issuance of a Torrens title in one co-owner's name creates an implied trust by operation of law that cannot be repudiated by reliance on the registration. Prescription begins to run against a co-owner only upon unequivocal acts of repudiation made known to the other co-owners, and even the issuance of a certificate of title—while constituting an open repudiation—does not start the prescriptive period if the other co-owners are still in actual possession of the property.
The subject property is a parcel of land in Barangay Bangan, Botolan, Zambales, originally possessed by Macaria De Ocampo. Macaria's nephew, Hermogenes Yambao, acted as administrator of the property and paid realty taxes therefor. Hermogenes had eight children: Ulpiano, Dominic, Teofilo, Feliciano, Asesclo, Delia, Amelia, and Melinda, all surnamed Yambao. After Hermogenes died, all of his heirs freely picked and harvested from fruit-bearing trees on the property, and Eleanor Yambao, Ulpiano's daughter, constructed a house thereon. Feliciano was eventually awarded a free patent over the property, for which Original Certificate of Title No. P-10737 was issued on November 29, 1989.
Mariano vs. Martinez Memorial Colleges, Inc.
13th April 2016
AK284491An employee occupying a position of trust may be validly dismissed for loss of trust and confidence premised on dishonesty, provided the employer has reasonable ground to believe the employee is responsible for the misconduct, and the twin requirements of written notice and opportunity to be heard are satisfied. A transfer or reassignment pending investigation of alleged company-policy violations likewise falls within the ambit of management prerogative and does not constitute constructive dismissal when made in good faith and not as a penalty.
Martinez Memorial Colleges, Inc. (MMC) is a private educational institution located in Caloocan City, with Ferdinand A. Martinez as its incumbent President and Chief Executive and Dr. Elizabeth M. Del Rio as its Executive Vice-President. Sonia F. Mariano had been employed as MMC's Assistant Cashier since April 15, 1976—a tenure spanning 32 years—performing duties that included accepting payments, issuing receipts, and preparing bank deposit slips for MMC students. Her husband, Dario Mariano, served as MMC's Director for Finance, placing both spouses in the institution's finance hierarchy.
Nulada vs. Paulma
12th April 2016
AK189661A lawyer's final conviction for violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang 22 (BP 22), which constitutes a crime involving moral turpitude, violates the lawyer's oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility, warranting suspension from the practice of law for two (2) years.
Atty. Orlando S. Paulma, a member of the Sangguniang Bayan of Miagao, Iloilo, issued a check dated September 30, 2005 in the amount of P650,000.00 to Alex Nulada as payment for a personal debt. Nulada accepted the check based on Paulma's standing as a respected member of the community and public official. When presented for payment, the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds. Despite notice of dishonor and repeated demands, Paulma failed to make good the amount, prompting Nulada to file a criminal complaint for violation of BP 22.
LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. vs. Agham Party List
12th April 2016
AK159032A Writ of Kalikasan will not issue absent proof of (1) an actual or threatened violation of the constitutional right to a balanced and healthful ecology arising from an unlawful act or omission, and (2) environmental damage of such magnitude as to prejudice the life, health or property of inhabitants in two or more cities or provinces, as the burden lies with the petitioner to substantiate these requisites through concrete evidence rather than general allegations.
LNL Archipelago Minerals, Inc. (LAMI), operator of a mining claim in Sta. Cruz, Zambales under Mineral Production Sharing Agreement No. 268-2008-III, secured multiple national permits to construct a private port facility in Brgy. Bolitoc approximately 25 kilometers from its mine site. The permits included a Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) dated 2 May 2011, a provisional foreshore lease agreement, Philippine Ports Authority (PPA) clearances, and a Tree Cutting Permit dated 17 April 2012 from the Community Environment and Natural Resources Office (CENRO) for 37 trees. The project received support from the local barangay, munici…
Consular Area Residents Association, Inc. vs. Casanova
12th April 2016
AK033551A petition denominated as one for prohibition but which ultimately seeks to permanently stop a demolition is essentially an action for injunction, and under Section 21 of RA 7227, only the Supreme Court may issue injunctions to restrain the implementation of military reservation conversion projects. However, a writ of injunction requires a clear and unmistakable right in esse; in its absence, the writ must not issue, and demolitions and evictions may be validly carried out without a judicial order when government infrastructure projects with available funding are about to be implemented pursuant to Section 28(b) of RA 7279.
The Bases Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) is a government-owned and controlled corporation created under Republic Act No. 7227, the Bases Conversion and Development Act of 1992, to accelerate the conversion of military reservations into alternative productive uses and to raise funds through the sale of portions of Metro Manila military camps. Executive Order No. 40, Series of 1992, identified Fort Bonifacio as one of the military camps earmarked for development and disposition. Within Fort Bonifacio are the JUSMAG Area, a 34.5-hectare area along Lawton Avenue where military officers and their families occupied housing units originally constructed by the AFP, and the Diplomatic a…
Pacquiao vs. Court of Tax Appeals
6th April 2016
AK022135The Court of Tax Appeals has the authority to dispense with or reduce the bond requirement under Section 11 of R.A. No. 1125 when the methods employed by the CIR in tax assessment and collection are patently illegal or not sanctioned by law; however, such determination requires a preliminary hearing and reception of evidence by the CTA to establish the existence of such illegality, which cannot be made by the Supreme Court on a Rule 65 petition without an evidentiary basis.
Emmanuel Pacquiao, a world-class professional boxer, and his spouse Jinkee Pacquiao derived income from both the Philippines and the United States. Prior to becoming public officials, Emmanuel earned substantial income from boxing purses in the US (primarily under Top Rank, Inc.) and from Philippine-sourced talent fees, product endorsements, and television appearances. The dispute arose from the Bureau of Internal Revenue's (BIR) investigation and assessment of deficiency income taxes and Value Added Tax (VAT) for taxable years 2008 and 2009, which the petitioners contested as having been issued in violation of procedural due process and based on unsubstantiated fraud allegations.