Undetermined Case Digests
There are 6,005 results on the current subject filter
| Title | IDs & Reference #s ▼ | Background | Primary Holding | Subject Matter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Briones vs. Court of Appeals (14th January 2015) |
AK719730 G.R. No. 204444 |
Virgilio C. Briones owned real property covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 160689. He had been residing and working in Vietnam since October 31, 2007, returning only briefly from December 28, 2007 to January 3, 2008 to spend the holidays with his family. On July 15, 2010, his sister informed him that the property had been foreclosed and a writ of possession issued in favor of Cash Asia Credit Corporation. Investigation revealed that on December 6, 2007, documents purportedly executed by Briones—including a promissory note, loan agreement, and deed of real estate mortgage—secured a ₱3,500,000.00 loan from Cash Asia using the subject property as collateral. |
An exclusive venue stipulation in a written instrument is inapplicable to actions directly assailing the validity of the instrument itself (e.g., alleging forgery or lack of consent), and such actions must be filed in accordance with the general rules on venue under Rule 4 of the Rules of Court, not the contractual stipulation. |
Undetermined Civil Procedure — Venue — Exclusive Venue Stipulation — Actions Assailing Validity of Written Instrument |
|
People vs. Tibayan and Puerto (14th January 2015) |
AK817863 G.R. Nos. 209655-60 G.R. No. 209655 |
Tibayan Group Investment Company, Inc. (TGICI) was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 21, 2001 as an open-end investment company. In 2002, the SEC investigated TGICI and discovered it was selling securities to the public without registration and had submitted a fraudulent Treasurer's Affidavit. On October 21, 2003, the SEC revoked TGICI's corporate registration for being fraudulently procured. Sometime thereafter, multiple criminal cases were filed against the incorporators and directors of TGICI for Syndicated Estafa based on complaints from investors who were induced to place money with the company based on promises of high monthly interest rates ran… |
Syndicated Estafa is committed when five or more persons form a syndicate with the intention of carrying out a fraudulent investment scheme involving false pretenses regarding the capacity to generate high returns, resulting in the misappropriation of funds solicited from the public, and an appeal in a criminal case confers jurisdiction upon the appellate court to upgrade a conviction from simple Estafa to Syndicated Estafa and increase the penalty accordingly. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Syndicated Estafa under Item 2(a), Paragraph 4, Article 315 of the RPC in relation to PD 1689 — Ponzi Scheme |
|
Fantastico vs. Malicse (12th January 2015) |
AK142648 G.R. No. 190912 750 Phil. 120 |
On the afternoon of June 27, 1993, Elpidio Malicse, Sr., while intoxicated, confronted his sister Isabelita Iguiron at her house in Pandacan, Manila, resulting in a commotion that was initially pacified by the Barangay Chairman. After returning home, Elpidio decided to go back to Isabelita's house to offer reconciliation. Upon his arrival, he was met with hostility by Isabelita's son Titus and son-in-law Gary Fantastico. When Elpidio kicked the door open, he was attacked by multiple assailants including Salvador Iguiron (with a rattan stick), Gary Fantastico (with a tomahawk), and Rolando Villanueva (with a lead pipe), resulting in serious injuries including bilateral leg fractures and mult… |
In a prosecution for attempted murder, the Information need not allege that the injuries inflicted are "necessarily mortal" to be sufficient under Section 6, Rule 110 of the Rules of Court, provided it alleges the elements under Article 6 of the Revised Penal Code. Furthermore, abuse of superior strength is present when there is a notorious inequality of forces between armed aggressors and an unarmed, intoxicated victim, deliberately taken advantage of by the aggressors, even if the attack was spontaneous and therefore lacked treachery. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Attempted Murder — Elements — Abuse of Superior Strength — Indeterminate Sentence Law |
|
Republic vs. Heirs of Borbon (12th January 2015) |
AK371178 G.R. No. 165354 750 Phil. 37 |
The National Power Corporation (NAPOCOR), a government-owned and controlled corporation vested with authority under Republic Act No. 6395 to develop hydro-electric power and construct transmission lines, entered a 14,257-square meter property located in Barangay San Isidro, Batangas City in February 1993 to construct and maintain transmission lines for the 230 KV Mahabang Parang-Pinamucan Power Transmission Project. The property was registered under Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-9696 in the name of the Heirs of Saturnino Q. Borbon. NAPOCOR entered the property without the owners' consent, installed five transmission line posts and five woodpoles, and destroyed some fruit trees. |
When an expropriation proceeding is discontinued due to the cessation of the public purpose for which the property was sought, the expropriator who had already taken possession of the property is obliged to pay reasonable compensation or damages to the landowner for the period of such possession, reckoned from the time of actual taking (entry) until the restoration of possession, rather than just compensation based on the full market value of the property. |
Undetermined Constitutional Law — Eminent Domain — Discontinuance of Expropriation Proceedings Due to Cessation of Public Purpose — Compensation for Use During Possession |
|
Geronimo vs. Calderon (10th December 2014) |
AK875530 G.R. No. 201781 749 Phil. 871 |
Spouses Estela and Rodolfo Calderon reside at #31 Silverlane Street in Silverland Subdivision, Pasong Tamo, Tandang Sora, Quezon City, directly across from the home of spouses Joel and Annie Geronimo at #48 Silverlane Street. In May 2005, the Geronimos, together with Susan and Jonas Geronimo, constructed a building beside their residence which they represented as an extension house for family use but which was subsequently used as the Silverland Alliance Christian Church (SACC). The church conducted daily worship services, baptisms, summer school, choir rehearsals, band practices, and utilized loud sound systems until late evening, generating noise that allegedly affected the health of the … |
The HLURB has exclusive jurisdiction over complaints filed by subdivision lot buyers against developers and homeowners' associations involving the enforcement of contractual and statutory obligations to maintain residential use restrictions, and administrative agencies may take judicial notice of their official records without strict adherence to the rules of evidence. |
Undetermined Administrative Law — HLURB Jurisdiction — Specific Performance of Contractual and Statutory Obligations — Residential Use Restrictions in Subdivisions |
|
Villafuerte vs. Robredo (10th December 2014) |
AK117784 G.R. No. 195390 |
In 1995, the Commission on Audit examined the utilization of Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) shares by local government units for the years 1993-1994 and found that substantial portions of the 20% development fund had been diverted to expenses properly chargeable against Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses, in violation of Section 287 of the Local Government Code of 1991. In response, the DILG issued Memorandum Circular No. 95-216 to prescribe policies on the development fund. On August 31, 2010, then-DILG Secretary Jesse M. Robredo issued Memorandum Circular No. 2010-83, requiring full disclosure of local budgets, finances, bids, and public offerings. On December 2, 2010, he issued M… |
Memorandum circulars issued by the Department of the Interior and Local Government requiring local government units to publicly post detailed budgetary, financial, and procurement documents, and prescribing guidelines for the utilization of the 20% development fund component of the Internal Revenue Allotment, do not transgress constitutional guarantees of local autonomy and fiscal autonomy, provided they merely reiterate existing statutory mandates and implement the President's power of general supervision rather than exercising control or imposing new substantive restrictions beyond those contemplated by law. |
Undetermined Administrative Law — Local Government — Validity of DILG Memorandum Circulars on Full Disclosure Policy and Internal Revenue Allotment Utilization — Local and Fiscal Autonomy |
|
PAGCOR vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue (10th December 2014) |
AK605056 G.R. No. 215427 |
PAGCOR operates gambling casinos, gaming clubs, and other similar recreation or amusement places under Presidential Decree No. 1869, as amended by Republic Act No. 9487. Its Charter classifies income into two distinct categories: (1) income from gaming operations under Section 13(2)(b), and (2) income from other related services under Section 14(5). Section 13(2)(a) imposes a 5% franchise tax on gross revenue from gaming operations "in lieu of all kinds of taxes," while Section 14(5) expressly subjects income from related services to income tax, excluding it from franchise tax application. In 2005, Congress enacted R.A. No. 9337 amending the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (R.A. No.… |
PAGCOR's income derived from gaming operations is subject only to the five percent (5%) franchise tax under Section 13(2)(a) of P.D. 1869, as amended, in lieu of all other taxes, while its income from other related services is subject only to corporate income tax under Section 14(5) of P.D. 1869, as amended by R.A. No. 9337, the BIR having exceeded its authority in issuing administrative rules that conflict with the express provisions of PAGCOR's franchise. |
Undetermined Taxation — Corporate Income Tax and Franchise Tax — Government-Owned and Controlled Corporations — Interpretation of P.D. 1869 and R.A. No. 9337 |
|
Oca vs. Custodio (3rd December 2014) |
AK729846 G.R. No. 174996 |
St. Francis School of General Trias, Cavite, Inc. (School) is a non-stock, non-profit educational institution established in 1973 with original incorporators including private respondent Laurita Custodio and petitioners Cirila Mojica and Josefina Pascual. In 1988, the School entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with De La Salle Greenhills (DLSG) permitting the latter to exercise supervisory powers over academic affairs. Pursuant thereto, DLSG Brothers, including petitioners Bernard Oca and Dennis Magbanua, subsequently became members of the Board of Trustees and officers of the School. A dispute arose when Custodio opposed a proposed new MOA that would have expanded DLSG control ove… |
A status quo order in an intra-corporate controversy may be issued only after hearing the parties and the posting of a bond, and is strictly limited to maintaining the last actual, peaceable, and uncontested state of things which preceded the controversy; it cannot direct the undoing of acts already consummated, which is the proper subject of mandatory injunctive relief requiring compliance with the stricter requirements of a verified application and bond under Rule 58 of the Rules of Court. |
Undetermined Corporate Law — Intra-Corporate Controversies — Status Quo Orders — Requirements of Hearing and Bond under Section 1, Rule 10 of the Interim Rules of Procedure for Intra-Corporate Controversies |
|
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company vs. Ley Construction and Development Corporation (3rd December 2014) |
AK619941 G.R. No. 185590 |
LCDC, a general contracting firm, applied with Philippine Banking Corporation (now Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company) for the opening of Letter of Credit No. DC 90-303-C in the amount of USD 802,500.00 to finance the importation of 15,000 metric tons of Iraqi cement from Global Enterprises Limited. The spouses Manuel and Janet Ley executed a Continuing Surety Agreement to guarantee LCDC’s obligations. After the LC was negotiated and the Bank’s account debited for USD 770,691.30, the Bank received shipping documents which were delivered to LCDC. LCDC executed a trust receipt acknowledging receipt of the documents. However, the cement shipment never arrived due to the United Nations trade e… |
A petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court may raise only questions of law, not questions of fact; consequently, issues regarding the sufficiency of evidence to establish a cause of action by preponderance, which require an examination of the probative value of evidence, are improper subjects of review under said rule. |
Undetermined Commercial Law — Letters of Credit — Trust Receipts — Preponderance of Evidence — Demurrer to Evidence |
|
Mangaser vs. Ugay (3rd December 2014) |
AK498712 G.R. No. 204926 |
Petitioner Anacleto Mangaser is the registered owner of a 10,632-square-meter parcel of land in Santiago Sur, Caba, La Union, covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. RP-174 (FP-13 787) issued pursuant to a free patent under Commonwealth Act No. 141. Respondent Dionisio Ugay, claiming to have resided in the area since birth, constructed a residential house and installed a fence on a portion of the property in 2006, allegedly guided by concrete boundary monuments. Mangaser discovered the intrusion on October 31, 2006, and after failed barangay conciliation and ignored demands to vacate, filed a complaint for forcible entry on October 30, 2007. |
Prior physical possession in forcible entry cases may be established through juridical acts—such as the execution and registration of public instruments, issuance of title under a free patent, and payment of real property taxes—not solely by actual physical occupation. Possession acquired through legal formalities that subject the property to the action of the owner's will satisfies the "prior physical possession" requirement in ejectment suits. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Forcible Entry — Prior Physical Possession — Juridical Acts as Proof of Possession |
|
People of the Philippines vs. Estibal (26th November 2014) |
AK202676 G.R. No. 208749 748 Phil. 850 |
Anecito Estibal y Calungsag, a 43-year-old security guard, lived with his wife BBB and their two children, including 13-year-old daughter AAA, in a one-room house in Taguig City. On February 5, 2009, AAA allegedly revealed to her cousin DDD that she had been sexually abused by her father since Grade III, including a rape that morning. With DDD's assistance, BBB confronted AAA, who confirmed the abuse. They then reported the incident to the Barangay Security Force and the police, leading to the accused's arrest that evening. |
Out-of-court statements made by a rape victim to authorities do not qualify as part of the res gestae when they are not spontaneous reactions to a startling occurrence but are instead deliberate re-tellings of past events made after the declarant has had sufficient time to reflect and has been emboldened by third parties to pursue prosecution; such statements are inadmissible hearsay that cannot sustain a conviction for rape in the absence of the victim's testimony. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Rape — Res Gestae Exception to Hearsay Rule — Victim's Non-Testimony |
|
De Guzman, Jr. vs. People (26th November 2014) |
AK954478 G.R. No. 178512 748 Phil. 452 |
On December 24, 1997, at approximately ten o'clock in the evening, Alexander Flojo was fetching water below his rented house at 443 Aglipay Street, Old Zaniga St., Mandaluyong City when Alfredo De Guzman, Jr., the brother of his landlady, hit him on the nape. After the landlady apologized and instructed him to go upstairs, Flojo rested for about two hours. At around midnight, while Flojo had returned to fetch water, De Guzman suddenly appeared and stabbed him on the left face and chest, inflicting wounds that the attending physician testified would have been fatal without timely medical intervention. |
Intent to kill in frustrated homicide may be established through the overt and external acts and conduct of the offender before, during, and after the assault, or by the nature, location, and number of the wounds inflicted on the victim; without proof of such intent, the felony may only constitute serious physical injuries. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Frustrated Homicide — Intent to Kill — Elements and Distinction from Serious Physical Injuries |
|
Hermano Oil Manufacturing & Sugar Corporation vs. Toll Regulatory Board (26th November 2014) |
AK656978 G.R. No. 167290 748 Phil. 359 |
Hermano Oil Manufacturing & Sugar Corporation owned a parcel of land located at the right side of the Sta. Rita Exit of the North Luzon Expressway (NLEX) in Guiguinto, Bulacan, bounded by an access fence that prevented direct ingress to and egress from the expressway. The property was acquired by the petitioner in 1999 when the NLEX and the access fence were already in existence, and a portion of the land had previously been sold to the Republic of the Philippines in 1979 as indicated in the transfer certificate of title. |
Government-owned and controlled corporations created under the Corporation Code, such as the PNCC, do not enjoy sovereign immunity from suit; however, courts are prohibited from issuing injunctions against government infrastructure projects under PD 1818 and RA 8975, and the establishment of access restrictions on limited access highways pursuant to RA 2000 constitutes a valid exercise of police power that does not require compensation under the power of eminent domain. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Easement of Right of Way — Limited Access Facility under Republic Act No. 2000 — Remedial Law — Prohibition on Injunctions against Government Infrastructure Projects under Presidential Decree No. 1818 and Republic Act No. 8975 — Constitutional |
|
De Pedro vs. Romasan Development Corporation (26th November 2014) |
AK876240 G.R. No. 194751 748 Phil. 706 CA G.R. SP. No. 96471 |
Romasan Development Corporation owned a parcel of land in Antipolo City covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 236044, derived from Original Certificate of Title No. 438 issued as early as August 30, 1937. In November 1996, Romasan's representative discovered that Aurora De Pedro had erected fences on a portion of this property and claimed ownership based on Original Certificate of Title No. P-691 issued pursuant to Free Patent No. 045802-91-914 dated December 9, 1991. Investigation revealed that the Department of Environment and Natural Resources had issued free patents covering portions of Romasan's property to several individuals, including De Pedro, despite the property having bee… |
The filing of a motion for new trial or reconsideration constitutes voluntary appearance that cures a defect in the acquisition of jurisdiction over the person due to improper service of summons; moreover, a party who has availed herself of the ordinary remedies of new trial and certiorari and lost therein is barred from subsequently filing a petition for annulment of judgment under Rule 47 of the Rules of Civil Procedure. |
Undetermined Civil Procedure — Service of Summons — Requirements for Substituted Service and Service by Publication; Special Civil Actions — Annulment of Judgment — Bar by Prior Availment of Ordinary Remedies |
|
PACE vs. Alibutdan-Diaz (26th November 2014) |
AK857965 A.C. No. 10134 |
Atty. Edna M. Alibutdan-Diaz served as National Treasurer of the Philippine Association of Court Employees (PACE), an umbrella organization of first and second level court employees. During her tenure, PACE held its 11th National Convention in Davao City in October 2005 and its 12th National Convention in Iloilo City in March 2007. As treasurer, Atty. Diaz was entrusted with the custody and management of all financial matters for these events. Following the 12th convention, questions arose regarding her handling of association funds, her eligibility to run for re-election, and her receipt of a term-end bonus approved by the outgoing board of directors. |
A lawyer may be suspended from the practice of law for engaging in dishonest or deceitful conduct in a non-legal capacity, such as serving as officer of a professional association, where such conduct demonstrates a lack of candor and integrity requisite for continued membership in the Bar. |
Undetermined Legal Ethics — Code of Professional Responsibility — Rule 1.01 — Dishonest Conduct — Failure to Liquidate Association Funds |
|
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company vs. Wilfred N. Chiok (26th November 2014) |
AK008740 G.R. No. 172652 G.R. No. 175302 G.R. No. 175394 |
Wilfred N. Chiok engaged in dollar trading with Gonzalo B. Nuguid for several years, with transactions running into millions of pesos. Chiok maintained accounts with Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company (Metrobank) and Asian Banking Corporation (now Global Business Bank, Inc.). On July 5, 1995, Chiok purchased from Global Bank two manager's checks totaling ₱18,455,350.00 and from Metrobank one cashier's check for ₱7,613,000.00, all payable to "Gonzalo Bernardo" (Nuguid). Chiok deposited these checks in Nuguid's account with Far East Bank & Trust Company (FEBTC, now Bank of the Philippine Islands) as payment for US$1,022,288.50 that Nuguid was to deliver the same day. Nuguid failed to deliver… |
Manager's checks and cashier's checks are pre-accepted primary obligations of the issuing bank, regarded as substantially equivalent to cash, and cannot be countermanded or subjected to stop payment orders based solely on the purchaser's allegation of the payee's breach of a separate underlying contract; rescission under Article 1191 of the Civil Code operates only between the parties to the contract and cannot affect non-party issuing banks. |
Undetermined Commercial Law — Negotiable Instruments — Manager's Checks and Cashier's Checks — Stop Payment Orders Based on Failure of Consideration — Rescission of Contract |
|
Geroche, Garde and Marfil vs. People (26th November 2014) |
AK942829 G.R. No. 179080 |
On the evening of May 14, 1989, in Sitio New Lantawan, Barangay Greenhills, President Roxas, Cotabato, petitioners Edigardo Geroche (Barangay Captain), Roberto Garde, and Generoso Marfil (both members of the Citizen Armed Forces Geographical Unit or CAFGU), armed with garand rifles, forcibly entered the house of Baleriano Limbag. They broke down the main door, conducted a search without warrant or consent, mauled Limbag causing physical injuries, and seized his airgun. The incident occurred at approximately 10:00 p.m. while the occupants were sleeping. |
An accused who appeals from a sentence of conviction waives the constitutional safeguard against double jeopardy and throws the entire case open to appellate review, permitting the appellate court to modify the judgment by convicting the accused of the offense originally charged notwithstanding a prior acquittal therefor by the trial court. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Violation of Domicile under Article 128 of the Revised Penal Code — Double Jeopardy — Indeterminate Sentence Law |
|
Torres, Jr. vs. Lapinid (26th November 2014) |
AK447195 G.R. No. 187987 |
Vicente Torres, Jr., Carlos Velez, and Mariano Velez (petitioners) and Jesus Velez (respondent) are co-owners of several parcels of land in Carcar, Cebu, including Lot No. 4389 with an area of 19,018 square meters. In 1993, Jesus initiated a partition case against the other co-owners. Prior to the resolution of that case, Jesus acquired additional shares from other co-owners, consolidating his ownership to 73% of Lot No. 4389. On 9 November 1997, Jesus executed a deed of sale conveying 3,000 square meters of Lot No. 4389 to Lorenzo Lapinid (respondent), who took possession of a portion thereof. In 2001, the partition case was resolved through a compromise agreement authorizing Jesus, Marian… |
A co-owner may validly sell his undivided share in co-owned property to a third party without the consent of the other co-owners, and such sale is effective to transfer the seller’s proportionate abstract interest to the buyer, who thereby becomes a co-owner in substitution of the seller. Even where the sale purports to convey a specific physical portion of the property prior to partition, the transaction is not void ab initio but operates to transfer only the seller’s ideal share equivalent to the consideration given, pursuant to the principle that contracts must be recognized as far as legally possible (quando res non valet ut ago, valeat quantum valere potest). |
Undetermined Civil Law — Co-ownership — Sale of Definite Portion of Co-owned Property Prior to Partition |
|
People vs. Consorte (26th November 2014) |
AK763348 G.R. No. 194068 |
Accused-appellant Benjie Consorte y Franco was convicted for the murder of Elizabeth Palmar. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction on May 27, 2010. On July 9, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court's decision with modifications to the damages awarded. While his motion for reconsideration of this affirming decision was pending, Consorte died on July 14, 2014 at the New Bilibid Prison. |
Death of an accused pending appeal of his conviction extinguishes both his criminal liability and his civil liability ex delicto (civil liability based solely on the offense committed), provided the death occurs before final judgment, pursuant to Article 89(1) of the Revised Penal Code. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Extinguishment of Criminal Liability — Death of Accused Pending Appeal |
|
Ejercito vs. COMELEC (25th November 2014) |
AK736092 G.R. No. 212398 748 Phil. 205 |
Three days prior to the May 13, 2013 National and Local Elections, gubernatorial candidate Edgar "Egay" San Luis filed a petition for disqualification against incumbent Governor Emilio Ramon "E.R." Ejercito alleging two grounds: first, the distribution of "Orange Cards" providing free medical services to voters constituting vote-buying under Section 68(a) of the Omnibus Election Code; and second, campaign overspending under Section 68(c) for allegedly exceeding the authorized expenditure limit of P4,576,566.00. Despite the pending petition, Ejercito was proclaimed winner with 549,310 votes against San Luis' 471,209 votes. |
A candidate may be disqualified from holding office for spending in excess of the authorized amount under Section 68(c) of the Omnibus Election Code through administrative proceedings that are summary in character and require only clear preponderance of evidence, without need of prior criminal conviction or preliminary investigation; contributions by third parties for campaign purposes made with the candidate's written acceptance constitute election expenditures attributable to the candidate and are subject to statutory limits. |
Undetermined Election Law — Disqualification — Exceeding Authorized Campaign Expenditures under Section 68 of the Omnibus Election Code |
|
Alcantara vs. Lim (25th November 2014) |
AK234612 G.R. No. 187836 G.R. No. 187916 |
The Pandacan district in Manila, originally designated as an industrial zone in the 1920s, evolved into a densely populated residential and commercial area inhabited by approximately 84,000 residents, with schools enrolling over 15,000 students and Malacañang Palace situated approximately two kilometers away. Since the early 20th century, three major oil companies—Chevron Philippines, Inc., Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, and Petron Corporation—operated terminals storing millions of liters of highly flammable petroleum products, supplying 95% of Metro Manila’s fuel requirements. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the Sangguniang Panlungsod enacted Ordinance No. 8027 … |
The right to life and security enjoys precedence over the right to property, and an ordinance purporting to exercise police power to promote general welfare is unconstitutional if it exposes densely populated communities to imminent catastrophic risk from hazardous industrial operations, notwithstanding claimed economic benefits or safety measures. |
Undetermined Constitutional Law — Police Power — Validity of Zoning Ordinance No. 8187 allowing continued operation of Pandacan oil depots — Right to Life, Security and Healthful Ecology |
|
Goh vs. Bayron (25th November 2014) |
AK149386 G.R. No. 212584 |
Alroben J. Goh filed a petition for recall against Mayor Lucilo R. Bayron of Puerto Princesa City, alleging loss of confidence due to gross violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, incompetence, and dereliction of duty. The COMELEC initially found the petition sufficient in form and substance but suspended proceedings citing lack of appropriations in the 2014 GAA for recall elections. The suspension was based on a memorandum from the Financial Services Department raising funding issues and the absence of a specific "contingency fund" for recall. |
The 2014 General Appropriations Act provides a specific line-item appropriation for the conduct of recall elections under the "Operations" category, and the COMELEC Chairman is authorized to augment any deficiency therein from existing savings, provided the purpose of the appropriation is specific enough to allow the exercise of the constitutional mandate to conduct recall elections. |
Undetermined Election Law — Recall Elections — Funding and COMELEC's Power to Augment from Savings |
|
Philamlife vs. Secretary of Finance (24th November 2014) |
AK418435 G.R. No. 210987 747 Phil. 811 |
Philamlife, a life and general insurance company, decided to divest from the health maintenance organization industry by selling its 49.89% shareholding in PhilamCare Health Systems, Inc. The shares were sold through competitive bidding to STI Investments, Inc. in 2009 for USD 2,190,000. After paying capital gains taxes, Philamlife sought a tax clearance from the BIR, which instead demanded payment of donor's tax on the alleged gift resulting from the difference between the book value and the selling price. |
The Court of Tax Appeals has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over rulings of the Secretary of Finance reviewing the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's interpretative rulings under Section 4 of the NIRC; furthermore, sales of shares for less than their book value (fair market value) are subject to donor's tax as a "deemed gift" under Section 100 of the NIRC, irrespective of actual donative intent. |
Undetermined Taxation — Donor's Tax — Deemed Gift on Sale of Shares for Less Than Adequate Consideration — Court of Tax Appeals Jurisdiction |
|
People vs. Andrade (24th November 2014) |
AK775779 G.R. No. 187000 |
In 2003, the Bureau of Corrections conducted a random drug test among inmates of the National Bilibid Prison. Twenty-one inmates, including the respondents, tested positive for methamphetamine hydrochloride ("shabu"). The Department of Justice subsequently filed informations charging them with violation of Section 15, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002) for using dangerous drugs. |
When a motion to quash is grounded on the allegation that the facts charged do not constitute an offense, the trial court is mandated by Section 4, Rule 117 of the Rules of Court to give the prosecution an opportunity to correct the defect by amendment before granting the motion to dismiss; the court may not dismiss outright nor may it consider grounds other than those stated in the motion, except lack of jurisdiction. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Motion to Quash — Amendment of Information — Section 15, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 |
|
Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V. Rotterdam and The East Asiatic Co., Ltd. vs. Glow Laks Enterprises, Ltd. (19th November 2014) |
AK648388 G.R. No. 156330 747 Phil. 170 |
Petitioner Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V. Rotterdam, a foreign corporation engaged in shipping, loaded 343 cartons of garments belonging to respondent Glow Laks Enterprises, Ltd. at the Port of Manila for transport to Colon, Free Zone, Panama. Upon arrival at the Port of Colon, the goods were turned over to the National Ports Authority pursuant to alleged Panamanian law. Unauthorized persons subsequently secured the release of the goods using falsified bills of lading, resulting in the loss of the shipment valued at US$53,640.00. |
A common carrier's extraordinary responsibility for goods transported continues until actual or constructive delivery to the consignee or the person entitled to receive them; delivery solely to port or customs authorities does not terminate this responsibility. Foreign laws must be proven in accordance with Section 24 of Rule 132 of the Revised Rules of Court through official publication or properly attested and certified copies; otherwise, the processual presumption applies that such foreign law is identical to Philippine law. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Common Carriers — Misdelivery of Goods — Proof of Foreign Law — Extraordinary Diligence |
|
Dela Cruz vs. People of the Philippines (19th November 2014) |
AK010439 G.R. No. 189405 |
Petitioner Sherwin Dela Cruz, married to Darlene Dela Cruz who was employed at Sykes Asia Inc., discovered his wife's alleged illicit relationship with the victim, Jeffrey Wernher L. Gonzales, a coworker at the same company. On New Year's Day, petitioner went to the Sykes Asia office located at the 25th Floor of Robinson's Summit Center, Ayala Avenue, Makati City, purportedly to fetch his wife. A fatal confrontation occurred between petitioner and the victim at the latter's workstation, resulting in the victim's death from a single gunshot wound to the forehead. |
Self-defense is unavailable where the alleged unlawful aggression has ceased and the means employed are grossly disproportionate to the perceived threat. When an accused successfully disarms an alleged aggressor, any subsequent use of deadly force constitutes retaliation, not self-defense; moreover, the rational equivalence between the means of attack and defense requires that a firearm cannot be reasonably employed against a non-lethal fire extinguisher when the accused had opportunity to retreat or seek assistance. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Homicide — Self-Defense — Unlawful Aggression and Reasonable Necessity of Means |
|
Laud vs. People of the Philippines (19th November 2014) |
AK591092 G.R. No. 199032 |
The Philippine National Police applied before the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 50, for a warrant to search three caves located inside the Laud Compound in Purok 3, Barangay Ma-a, Davao City. The application sought the remains of victims allegedly summarily executed by the "Davao Death Squad" in December 2005. Ernesto Avasola testified that he personally witnessed the killing of six persons and participated in burying the bodies. Judge William Simon P. Peralta, acting as Vice-Executive Judge, issued Search Warrant No. 09-14407 on July 15, 2009, which was subsequently enforced by the PNP-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group. |
A judge who has been administratively divested of his position as Vice-Executive Judge may nevertheless validly issue a search warrant as a de facto officer, and search warrant applications for heinous crimes filed by the Philippine National Police before the Regional Trial Courts of Manila or Quezon City constitute an exception to the "compelling reasons" requirement under Section 2, Rule 126 of the Rules of Court, permitting enforcement outside the territorial jurisdiction of the issuing court. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Search Warrant — Validity of Warrant Issued by Manila RTC for Enforcement in Davao City; De Facto Officer Doctrine |
|
Crescencio vs. People of the Philippines (19th November 2014) |
AK343078 G.R. No. 205015 |
DENR Forest Protection Unit Chief Eufemio Abaniel, acting on information regarding a stockpile of lumber at Balico, Talibon, Bohol, proceeded to the residence of Ma. Mimie Crescencio on March 15, 1994, accompanied by Forest Rangers Urcino Butal, Alfredo Bastasa, and Celso Ramos. Upon arrival, they observed forest products lying under the petitioner's house and at the shoreline approximately two meters away. When questioned regarding ownership, the petitioner admitted the lumber belonged to her but failed to produce legal documents authorizing possession, presenting instead an official receipt that did not correspond to the species and dimensions of the seized lumber. |
Possession of timber or other forest products without the legal documents required under existing forest laws and regulations constitutes a malum prohibitum offense punishable as qualified theft, where mere possession without proper documentation consummates the crime regardless of the legality of the source; and where the prosecution fails to prove the value of the forest products beyond mere uncorroborated estimates, the minimum penalty under Article 309(6) of the Revised Penal Code shall apply, increased by two degrees pursuant to Article 310. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Violation of Section 68 of P.D. No. 705 (Revised Forestry Code) — Possession of Timber or Forest Products without Legal Documents — Plain View Doctrine — Qualified Theft |
|
Mackay vs. Caswell (17th November 2014) |
AK336008 G.R. No. 183872 |
Spouses Dana and Cerelina Caswell engaged Owen Prosper A. Mackay to install electrical lines in their newly constructed home in San Narciso, Zambales, for a lump sum contract price of ₱250,000.00. After paying ₱227,000.00, the Caswells discovered that the installation contained numerous technical deficiencies preventing the local electric cooperative, Zambales II Electric Cooperative (Zameco II), from energizing the residence. Owen could not be located to rectify the defects, prompting the Caswells to engage Zameco II to correct the work at their own expense. |
Under Article 1715 of the Civil Code, a contractor who executes work with defects that destroy or lessen its value or fitness for its ordinary or stipulated use may be required to remove the defect or execute another work; if the contractor fails or refuses, the employer may have the defect removed at the contractor’s cost, and the employer’s demand for rectification need not be in a particular form but may be satisfied by substantial efforts to communicate with the contractor to correct the flaws. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Obligations and Contracts — Contract for a Piece of Work — Article 1715 — Defective Work — Rectification Costs — Set-off |
|
Daging vs. Davis (12th November 2014) |
AK795854 A.C. No. 9395 |
Daria O. Daging operated the Nashville Country Music Lounge in Baguio City under a lease from Benjie Pinlac. On March 7, 2005, she entered into a Retainer Agreement with Davis & Sabling Law Office, represented by Atty. Riz Tingalon L. Davis and Atty. Amos Saganib Sabling, for legal services concerning her business. Due to rental delinquencies, Pinlac terminated the lease and arranged for Novie Balageo to take over the bar operations, which were subsequently renamed Amarillo Music Bar. |
The prohibition against representing conflicting interests under Rule 15.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility is absolute and extends to all members of a law firm, such that a lawyer cannot represent a party adverse to his firm's client even if he claims no personal knowledge of the client's confidences, and good faith or lack of intent to betray the client is not a defense. |
Undetermined Legal Ethics — Representing Conflicting Interests — Rule 15.03, Canon 15 of the Code of Professional Responsibility |
|
SMI-Ed Philippines Technology, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (12th November 2014) |
AK719499 G.R. No. 175410 |
SMI-Ed Philippines Technology, Inc. was incorporated and registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) on June 29, 1998, authorized to engage in manufacturing ultra high-density microprocessor unit packages. Following registration, petitioner constructed buildings and purchased machineries and equipment totaling ₱3,150,925,917.00 as of December 31, 1999. Due to the Asian financial crisis, petitioner failed to commence commercial operations and temporarily closed its factory on October 15, 1999. On August 1, 2000, petitioner sold its buildings and installed machineries to Ibiden Philippines, Inc., another PEZA-registered enterprise, for ¥2,100,000,000.00 (₱893,550,000.00). Pe… |
A PEZA-registered corporation that has never commenced operations is not entitled to fiscal incentives under Republic Act No. 7916, including the 5% preferential tax rate on gross income, and remains subject to ordinary tax rates under the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997; moreover, Section 27(D)(5) of the NIRC 1997 imposes 6% capital gains tax only on sales of lands and/or buildings, excluding machineries and equipment, which are subject to ordinary corporate income tax. |
Undetermined Taxation — Refund of Erroneously Paid Taxes — Court of Tax Appeals' Authority to Determine Proper Tax Category Without Assessment; PEZA Incentives — Entitlement Requirements — Commencement of Operations; Capital Gains Tax — Scope — Applicability Only to L |
|
Sydeco vs. People (12th November 2014) |
AK075332 G.R. No. 202692 |
On June 11, 2006, at approximately 3:00 a.m., petitioner Edmund Sydeco was driving a red Ford Ranger pick-up along Roxas Boulevard corner Quirino Avenue, Malate, Manila, accompanied by two companions. Police officers manning a checkpoint flagged him down. According to the police, Sydeco was swerving and smelled of liquor. According to Sydeco, the officers ordered him and his companions to alight for a body and vehicle search, which he refused, citing a previous extortion experience and insisting on a "plain view" search only. This led to a confrontation where the police allegedly punched him and pointed a gun at him before arresting him. |
A motorist's refusal to submit to a body and vehicle search at a checkpoint, absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, constitutes an exercise of the constitutional right against unreasonable searches and cannot be penalized as resistance or disobedience under Article 151 of the Revised Penal Code. Additionally, the presumption of regularity in the performance of official duties by police officers is rebutted when they deviate from statutory procedures and employ excessive force. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Driving Under the Influence of Liquor under Section 56(f) of RA 4136 — Resisting Arrest under Article 151 of the RPC — Presumption of Regularity of Police Duties — Retroactive Application of Favorable Penal Laws |
|
Orion Savings Bank vs. Suzuki (12th November 2014) |
AK591181 G.R. No. 205487 |
In August 2003, Shigekane Suzuki, a Japanese national, negotiated to purchase Condominium Unit No. 536 and Parking Slot No. 42 at Cityland Pioneer, Mandaluyong City, from Yung Sam Kang, a Korean national holding a Special Resident Retiree's Visa (SRRV). After paying ₱2.8 million and executing a Deed of Absolute Sale dated August 26, 2003, Suzuki took possession and commenced renovation. Kang failed to deliver the certificates of title, claiming they were held by Orion Savings Bank for safekeeping. Suzuki discovered that while the condominium title bore a cancelled mortgage to Orion from 1999 and a PRA restriction requiring approval for any conveyance, it showed no current encumbrance; the p… |
A party claiming priority in a double sale scenario under Article 1544 of the Civil Code must prove the due execution and validity of the prior conveyance, and failure to annotate a real estate transaction, coupled with the vendor's continued possession and the claimant's delay in asserting ownership rights, constitutes badges of fraud that defeat the claim of a prior valid sale. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Double Sale — Good Faith Purchaser — Dacion en Pago — Lex Loci Rei Sitae |
|
Pestilos vs. Generoso (10th November 2014) |
AK759021 G.R. No. 182601 |
Atty. Moreno Generoso resided on Kasiyahan Street, Barangay Holy Spirit, Quezon City, in the same neighborhood as petitioners Joey Pestilos, Dwight Macapanas, Miguel Gaces, Jerry Fernandez, and Ronald Munoz. In the early morning hours of February 20, 2005, an altercation erupted between Atty. Generoso and the petitioners, resulting in Atty. Generoso sustaining stab wounds and bruises from a mauling. |
A warrantless arrest under Section 5(b), Rule 113 is valid when: (1) an offense has just been committed; and (2) the arresting officer has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it, where "personal knowledge" encompasses facts or circumstances gathered through the officer's immediate observation and evaluation at the scene of the crime shortly after its commission, and "probable cause" signifies reasonable grounds of suspicion supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to warrant a cautious person to believe the accused is guilty. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Warrantless Arrest — Hot Pursuit under Rule 113, Section 5(b) — Personal Knowledge of Facts and Probable Cause |
|
Imasen vs. Alcon and Papa (22nd October 2014) |
AK774902 G.R. No. 194884 746 Phil. 172 |
Imasen Philippine Manufacturing Corporation, a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture of auto seat-recliners and slide-adjusters, employed respondents Ramonchito T. Alcon and Joann S. Papa as manual welders in 2001. On October 5, 2002, while working the second shift from 8:00 pm to 5:00 am, the respondents were discovered by a security guard having sexual intercourse on the floor of the company's "Tool and Die" section using a piece of carton as a mattress. The incident occurred at approximately 12:40 am when the respondents were expected to be at their workstations. Following an administrative investigation where the respondents claimed they were merely sleeping, the company termi… |
Engaging in sexual intercourse inside company premises during work hours constitutes serious misconduct under Article 282 (now Article 296) of the Labor Code, satisfying the requisites of: (a) being of grave and aggravated character and not merely trivial; (b) relating to the performance of the employee's duties showing unfitness to continue working for the employer; and (c) being performed with wrongful intent, thereby justifying dismissal even for first-time offenders. |
Undetermined Labor Law — Illegal Dismissal — Serious Misconduct — Sexual Intercourse on Company Premises During Work Hours |
|
Enrile vs. Manalastas (22nd October 2014) |
AK207476 G.R. No. 166414 746 Phil. 43 |
On January 18, 2003, a mauling incident occurred outside the house of petitioners Godofredo Enrile and Dr. Frederick Enrile in St. Francis Subdivision, Barangay Pandayan, Meycauayan, Bulacan. Claiming to be the victims, Josefina Guinto Morano, Rommel Morano, and Perla Beltran Morano filed criminal charges against the petitioners and one Alfredo Enrile for frustrated homicide (Rommel) and less serious physical injuries (Josefina and Perla). |
The remedy against the denial of a motion to quash is for the accused to enter a plea, proceed to trial, and should the decision be adverse, reiterate the issue on appeal and assign the denial as error; certiorari is not available because the denial is an interlocutory order and other adequate remedies exist in the ordinary course of law. Additionally, an information for less serious physical injuries is sufficient if it alleges that the victim was incapacitated for labor or required medical attendance for ten days or more, even if supported only by medical certificates showing probable healing periods, as the actual duration is an evidentiary matter to be proven during trial. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Motion to Quash — Proper Remedy of Appeal vs. Certiorari; Criminal Law — Less Serious Physical Injuries — Sufficiency of Information |
|
Luspo vs. People (22nd October 2014) |
AK249952 G.R. No. 188487 G.R. No. 188541 G.R. No. 188556 |
The case stems from a Commission on Audit report on disbursement irregularities within the PNP. An investigation revealed that in August 1992, two Advices of Sub-Allotment (ASAs) totaling P10 million were issued purportedly for the purchase of Combat, Clothing, and Individual Equipment (CCIE) for the North Capital Command. The funds were swiftly converted into 100 checks payable to four enterprises owned by a single private individual, Margarita Tugaoen, who encashed them without delivering any supplies. |
A public officer who performs a purely ministerial duty, such as signing a document to effect a fund release pursuant to a valid delegation of authority, cannot be held criminally liable under Section 3(e) of R.A. 3019 absent proof of corrupt motive or bad faith. Conversely, officers who facilitate the disbursement of funds for a fictitious transaction by circumventing mandatory documentation and auditing rules act with evident bad faith and manifest partiality. |
Undetermined Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act — Section 3(e) — Conspiracy in Ghost Purchases of Combat Clothing and Individual Equipment |
|
Pulgar vs. Resurreccion and Eugenio (21st October 2014) |
AK276765 A.M. No. P-09-2673 A.M. OCA IPI No. 00-857-P |
Atty. Frumencio E. Pulgar served as counsel for the petitioner in Civil Case No. 95-079, an annulment of marriage proceeding pending before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 276, Muntinlupa City. On February 26, 1997, Atty. Pulgar presented the petitioner's evidence ex parte. Paul M. Resurreccion, then Court Interpreter and Acting Branch Clerk of Court of said branch, received the evidence despite not being a lawyer. Resurreccion demanded ₱5,000 from Atty. Pulgar as payment for the ex parte proceeding—₱2,000 paid directly by Atty. Pulgar and ₱3,000 delivered the next day by Atty. Pulgar's liaison officer, also without receipt. When the petition was subsequently denied, Resurreccion pub… |
A court employee who usurps the functions of a commissioner by receiving evidence ex parte without being a member of the bar, and who illegally exacts money from litigants under the guise of commissioner's fees, commits grave misconduct warranting dismissal from the service even for a first offense. |
Undetermined Administrative Law — Grave Misconduct — Illegal Exaction of Commissioner’s Fees and Usurpation of Official Functions by Court Interpreter; Simple Dishonesty — False Testimony by Court Stenographer |
|
Barrido vs. Nonato (20th October 2014) |
AK223197 G.R. No. 176492 |
Leonardo V. Nonato and Marietta N. Barrido contracted marriage and acquired a house and lot in Eroreco, Bacolod City during its subsistence. On March 15, 1996, their marriage was declared void on the ground of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. Following the declaration of nullity, Nonato demanded partition of the conjugal property, but Barrido refused, claiming the property had been sold to their children. |
Article 147 of the Family Code governs the property relations of parties in a void marriage who are capacitated to marry each other and who lived exclusively as husband and wife, creating a regime of equal co-ownership where property acquired during the union is presumed to have been obtained through joint efforts, and upon dissolution, the property is divided according to the rules on co-ownership under the Civil Code rather than the liquidation procedures under Article 129 applicable to valid marriages. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Property — Partition — Property Regime of Void Marriages under Article 147 of the Family Code |
|
PLDT vs. Estranero (15th October 2014) |
AK736031 G.R. No. 192518 745 Phil. 543 |
PLDT adopted a company-wide Manpower Reduction Program (MRP) in 1995 aimed at reducing its workforce by offering redundancy packages to affected employees. Under this program, employees with less than fifteen years of service were entitled to separation pay equivalent to 200% of their basic monthly salary for every year of service. Henry Estranero, hired on July 1, 1995 as an Auto-Mechanic/Electrician Helper in the Fleet Management Division, was included in this program when his position was declared redundant due to a significant decrease in company vehicles and equipment requiring mechanical servicing. |
An employer cannot deduct an employee's outstanding loan obligations from wages or redundancy pay unless authorized by law or by the employee's written authorization under Article 113 of the Labor Code; set-off or legal compensation is impermissible where the employer is not the employee's creditor, and labor tribunals lack jurisdiction over civil disputes involving debtor-creditor relations distinct from the employer-employee relationship. |
Undetermined Labor Law — Wage Deductions — Authority to Deduct Outstanding Loans from Redundancy Pay; Set-off |
|
Marcos vs. Heirs of Bangi and Diccion (15th October 2014) |
AK301132 G.R. No. 185745 |
Alipio Bangi died in 1918, leaving a parcel of land in San Manuel, Pangasinan covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 22361. He was survived by his children Eusebio, Espedita, and Jose Bangi. In 1943, Eusebio executed a Deed of Absolute Sale conveying a one-third portion of the subject property to his relatives, the spouses Isidro Bangi and Genoveva Diccion. The respondents, heirs of Isidro and Genoveva, took possession of the purchased portion. In 1995, the petitioners, who are Eusebio's children and heirs, caused the registration of two Deeds of Absolute Sale—dated August 10, 1995 and November 21, 1995—purporting to convey the entire property including the one-third portion sol… |
An oral partition of an estate is valid and enforceable when it has been consummated by the heirs' taking possession in severalty and the exercise of ownership over their respective portions, even in the absence of a written instrument; long possession in severalty raises a presumption of partition that equity will recognize and enforce. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Succession — Oral Partition of Estate — Validity of Sale by Heir |
|
Castro vs. Gregorio (15th October 2014) |
AK488810 G.R. No. 188801 |
Atty. Jose Castro, a prominent lawyer from Ilocos Norte and estranged husband of Rosario Mata Castro, maintained a separate household with Lilibeth Fernandez Gregorio, allegedly his former housekeeper, with whom he had two children, respondents Jose Maria Jed Lemuel Gregorio and Ana Maria Regina Gregorio. Despite having a legitimate daughter, Joanne, with Rosario, Jose filed a petition for adoption in 2000 seeking to legitimize his relationship with respondents, falsely declaring in his petition that he and Rosario were childless and attaching a fraudulent affidavit purporting to show Rosario's consent. |
An adoption decree rendered without personal notice to the spouse and legitimate children of the adopter, whose consent is required by Republic Act No. 8552, is void for lack of jurisdiction; moreover, fraud employed specifically to prevent interested parties from participating in adoption proceedings constitutes extrinsic fraud under Rule 47 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, regardless of whether such fraud involved forged documents or perjured testimony presented during the trial. |
Undetermined Adoption — Annulment of Judgment — Consent of Spouse and Legitimate Children under Republic Act No. 8552 — Extrinsic Fraud |
|
Cruz y Bartolome vs. People (8th October 2014) |
AK683970 G.R. No. 166441 745 Phil. 54 |
Norberto Cruz y Bartolome and his wife Belinda employed AAA (15 years old) and BBB to assist in selling plastic and glass wares during the Bangar, La Union fiesta on December 20, 1993. After setting up tents near the municipal hall for the victims to sleep in, petitioner allegedly sexually assaulted AAA in the early morning hours of December 21, 1993, leading to criminal charges for attempted rape and acts of lasciviousness. |
Mere climbing on top of a naked female, embracing her, and touching her vagina and breasts without proof of the erectile penis being in a position to penetrate constitutes acts of lasciviousness, not attempted rape; the intent to lie with the female, which must be demonstrated through direct overt acts showing the penis capable of penetration touching the external genitalia, is the essential element distinguishing attempted rape from acts of lasciviousness. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Attempted Rape — Distinction from Acts of Lasciviousness — Intent to Lie with the Female |
|
Rosaldes vs. People (8th October 2014) |
AK658519 G.R. No. 173988 745 Phil. 77 |
On February 13, 1996, at Pughanan Elementary School in Lambunao, Iloilo, petitioner Felina Rosaldes, a Grade 1 public schoolteacher, was sleeping on a bamboo sofa inside the classroom when her seven-year-old pupil Michael Ryan Gonzales accidentally bumped her knee while hurriedly entering the room. Roused from sleep, Rosaldes demanded an apology, but when the child proceeded to his seat instead of obeying, she subjected him to severe physical maltreatment that resulted in physical injuries certified by a physician and caused the child to lose consciousness. |
Not every instance of the laying of hands on a child constitutes the crime of child abuse under Section 10(a) of Republic Act No. 7610; only when the laying of hands is shown beyond reasonable doubt to be intended by the accused to debase, degrade or demean the intrinsic worth and dignity of the child as a human being should it be punished as child abuse. Otherwise, it is punished under the Revised Penal Code. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Child Abuse — Section 10(a) of Republic Act No. 7610 — Acts that Debase, Degrade or Demean the Intrinsic Worth and Dignity of a Child — In Loco Parentis — Corporal Punishment Ban under Article 233 of the Family Code |
|
Ching and Powing Properties, Inc. vs. Cheng, Cheng, Igne and Santos (8th October 2014) |
AK117034 G.R. No. 175507 |
Antonio Ching owned businesses and properties valued at over ₱380 million, including Po Wing Properties, Incorporated. While unmarried, he had children with two women: Ramon Ching (with Lucina Santos) and Joseph Cheng and Jaime Cheng (with Mercedes Igne). Following Antonio Ching's murder on July 18, 1996, disputes arose regarding the distribution of his estate. Ramon Ching allegedly induced Mercedes Igne and her children to sign a waiver of their rights to the estate in exchange for ₱22.5 million, which they claimed was never paid. On October 29, 1996, Ramon Ching allegedly executed an affidavit of settlement of estate naming himself as sole heir. Ramon Ching became the primary suspect in A… |
The "two-dismissal rule" under Rule 17, Section 1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure applies only to dismissals effected at the instance of the plaintiff, and not to dismissals granted upon a defendant's motion to dismiss under Rule 16; therefore, a prior dismissal for lack of jurisdiction upon a defendant's motion does not bar a subsequent dismissal without prejudice when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the re-filed action before the defendant files an answer. |
Undetermined Rules of Civil Procedure — Two-Dismissal Rule under Rule 17 — Dismissal at Instance of Plaintiff versus Defendant — Forum Shopping — Res Judicata |
|
Carinan vs. Cueto (8th October 2014) |
AK882614 G.R. No. 198636 |
Esperanza Carinan and her late husband Jose acquired rights over a 180-square-meter parcel of land in Biñan, Laguna from Roberto Ventura in 1986 through a Deed of Assignment and Transfer of Rights with Assumption of Obligations, assuming the obligation to pay monthly amortizations to the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). By 2005, unpaid amortizations threatened the cancellation of the conditional sale. Esperanza, then a widow, sought financial assistance from her brother Gavino Cueto. The respondents paid Esperanza’s total obligation of ₱785,680.37 to the GSIS, plus additional expenses for the transfer of title and property renovation. Esperanza surrendered Transfer Certificate of… |
A donation of money exceeding ₱5,000 must be made in writing to be valid; absent compliance with the formal requirements of Article 748 of the New Civil Code, a claim of gratuitous donation fails where the evidence demonstrates an expectation of repayment and the prevention of unjust enrichment requires reimbursement of the amounts advanced. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Obligations and Contracts — Loan vs. Donation — Unjust Enrichment — Specific Performance |
|
Garcia vs. Ferro Chemicals, Inc. (1st October 2014) |
AK358468 G.R. No. 172505 |
Antonio Garcia executed a Deed of Absolute Sale and Purchase of Shares of Stock with Ferro Chemicals, Inc. on July 15, 1988, transferring various corporate shares including a class "A" share in Alabang Country Club, Inc. and a proprietary membership in Manila Polo Club, Inc. The transaction was allegedly structured to prevent these assets from being sold at public auction to satisfy Antonio Garcia's outstanding obligations to creditors. On March 3, 1989, the parties executed a Deed of Right of Repurchase allowing Antonio Garcia to redeem the shares within 180 days. Before the period expired, Antonio Garcia attempted to exercise his right to repurchase, but Ferro Chemicals refused. Subsequen… |
Jurisdiction over criminal cases is determined by the imposable penalty stated in the information and cannot be conferred by waiver or silence of the parties; where the penalty is arresto mayor (imprisonment of one month and one day to six months), the Metropolitan Trial Court has exclusive jurisdiction, not the Regional Trial Court. Consequently, all proceedings conducted by a court without jurisdiction are null and void. |
Undetermined Criminal Procedure — Jurisdiction — Forum Shopping — Civil Liability ex Delicto |
|
People of the Philippines vs. Dela Cruz (1st October 2014) |
AK533556 G.R. No. 205821 |
On September 14, 2004, the Zamboanga City Police Office conducted a buy-bust operation targeting accused-appellant Garry dela Cruz based on a tip from a civilian informant that a certain "Gary" was selling illegal drugs at the parking area for buses behind Food Mart on Governor Lim Street, Sangali, Bunguioa, Zamboanga City. The operation was coordinated by PO1 Wilfredo Bobon as poseur-buyer and SPO1 Roberto Roca as back-up arresting officer. The team prepared a ₱100.00 bill with serial number KM 776896 as marked money, with PO1 Bobon signaling consummation of the sale by removing his bull cap. |
Non-compliance with the chain of custody requirements under Section 21 of Republic Act No. 9165, without justifiable grounds, constitutes a failure to establish the identity of the corpus delicti and warrants acquittal, particularly where law enforcers keep seized miniscule amounts of dangerous drugs in their personal pockets without conducting the required physical inventory and photographing in the presence of the accused or the witnesses mandated by law. |
Undetermined Criminal Law — Dangerous Drugs — Chain of Custody Requirements under Section 21 of RA 9165 — Illegal Sale and Possession of Methamphetamine Hydrochloride |
|
Vivares vs. St. Theresa's College (29th September 2014) |
AK161082 G.R. No. 202666 744 Phil. 451 |
Minor students of St. Theresa's College (STC) in Cebu City posted digital photographs of themselves on Facebook wearing only brassieres and undergarments, some depicting them drinking liquor and smoking in public places. These images were uploaded by one of the students and allegedly viewable by their Facebook friends. A computer teacher at STC discovered the photos through her students' Facebook accounts, reported them to school officials, and the students were subsequently sanctioned for violating the school's Student Handbook provisions on immoral conduct, possession of alcoholic drinks outside campus, and inappropriate apparel. The students were barred from participating in the commence… |
The right to informational privacy in online social network (OSN) activities is not automatic; a user must manifest an intention to keep posts private through the positive employment of privacy tools and settings. Absent proof that privacy settings were utilized to limit access—such as the "Only Me" or "Custom" settings—there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook posts, even under the "Friends Only" setting, due to the inherent nature of social networking sites that facilitate sharing, tagging, and interaction among users. |
Undetermined Constitutional Law — Writ of Habeas Data — Right to Informational Privacy — Facebook Privacy Settings |
|
Dela Torre vs. Imbuido (29th September 2014) |
AK990687 G.R. No. 192973 |
Carmen Castillo Dela Torre was admitted to Divine Spirit General Hospital in Olongapo City on February 2, 1992, for delivery of her full-term pregnancy. Following unsuccessful labor, Dr. Nestor Pasamba performed a caesarian section on February 3, 1992. Post-operatively, Carmen developed abdominal pain, difficulty urinating, and progressive abdominal distension initially attributed to urinary tract infection and flatulence. A second surgery (exploratory laparotomy) was performed on February 12, 1992, to address suspected intestinal obstruction. Carmen died on February 13, 1992. While the hospital certificate attributed death to cardio-respiratory arrest secondary to cerebrovascular accident … |
In medical negligence cases, the plaintiff must prove by competent expert testimony the standard of care, the physician's breach thereof, and the causal connection between such breach and the injury, where the expert must possess specialization in the relevant field and base opinions on complete medical information including the patient's history and condition during treatment, not merely on limited autopsy findings. |
Undetermined Civil Law — Medical Negligence — Standard of Care and Expert Testimony |
Briones vs. Court of Appeals
14th January 2015
AK719730An exclusive venue stipulation in a written instrument is inapplicable to actions directly assailing the validity of the instrument itself (e.g., alleging forgery or lack of consent), and such actions must be filed in accordance with the general rules on venue under Rule 4 of the Rules of Court, not the contractual stipulation.
Virgilio C. Briones owned real property covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 160689. He had been residing and working in Vietnam since October 31, 2007, returning only briefly from December 28, 2007 to January 3, 2008 to spend the holidays with his family. On July 15, 2010, his sister informed him that the property had been foreclosed and a writ of possession issued in favor of Cash Asia Credit Corporation. Investigation revealed that on December 6, 2007, documents purportedly executed by Briones—including a promissory note, loan agreement, and deed of real estate mortgage—secured a ₱3,500,000.00 loan from Cash Asia using the subject property as collateral.
People vs. Tibayan and Puerto
14th January 2015
AK817863Syndicated Estafa is committed when five or more persons form a syndicate with the intention of carrying out a fraudulent investment scheme involving false pretenses regarding the capacity to generate high returns, resulting in the misappropriation of funds solicited from the public, and an appeal in a criminal case confers jurisdiction upon the appellate court to upgrade a conviction from simple Estafa to Syndicated Estafa and increase the penalty accordingly.
Tibayan Group Investment Company, Inc. (TGICI) was registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 21, 2001 as an open-end investment company. In 2002, the SEC investigated TGICI and discovered it was selling securities to the public without registration and had submitted a fraudulent Treasurer's Affidavit. On October 21, 2003, the SEC revoked TGICI's corporate registration for being fraudulently procured. Sometime thereafter, multiple criminal cases were filed against the incorporators and directors of TGICI for Syndicated Estafa based on complaints from investors who were induced to place money with the company based on promises of high monthly interest rates ran…
Fantastico vs. Malicse
12th January 2015
AK142648In a prosecution for attempted murder, the Information need not allege that the injuries inflicted are "necessarily mortal" to be sufficient under Section 6, Rule 110 of the Rules of Court, provided it alleges the elements under Article 6 of the Revised Penal Code. Furthermore, abuse of superior strength is present when there is a notorious inequality of forces between armed aggressors and an unarmed, intoxicated victim, deliberately taken advantage of by the aggressors, even if the attack was spontaneous and therefore lacked treachery.
On the afternoon of June 27, 1993, Elpidio Malicse, Sr., while intoxicated, confronted his sister Isabelita Iguiron at her house in Pandacan, Manila, resulting in a commotion that was initially pacified by the Barangay Chairman. After returning home, Elpidio decided to go back to Isabelita's house to offer reconciliation. Upon his arrival, he was met with hostility by Isabelita's son Titus and son-in-law Gary Fantastico. When Elpidio kicked the door open, he was attacked by multiple assailants including Salvador Iguiron (with a rattan stick), Gary Fantastico (with a tomahawk), and Rolando Villanueva (with a lead pipe), resulting in serious injuries including bilateral leg fractures and mult…
Republic vs. Heirs of Borbon
12th January 2015
AK371178When an expropriation proceeding is discontinued due to the cessation of the public purpose for which the property was sought, the expropriator who had already taken possession of the property is obliged to pay reasonable compensation or damages to the landowner for the period of such possession, reckoned from the time of actual taking (entry) until the restoration of possession, rather than just compensation based on the full market value of the property.
The National Power Corporation (NAPOCOR), a government-owned and controlled corporation vested with authority under Republic Act No. 6395 to develop hydro-electric power and construct transmission lines, entered a 14,257-square meter property located in Barangay San Isidro, Batangas City in February 1993 to construct and maintain transmission lines for the 230 KV Mahabang Parang-Pinamucan Power Transmission Project. The property was registered under Transfer Certificate of Title No. T-9696 in the name of the Heirs of Saturnino Q. Borbon. NAPOCOR entered the property without the owners' consent, installed five transmission line posts and five woodpoles, and destroyed some fruit trees.
Geronimo vs. Calderon
10th December 2014
AK875530The HLURB has exclusive jurisdiction over complaints filed by subdivision lot buyers against developers and homeowners' associations involving the enforcement of contractual and statutory obligations to maintain residential use restrictions, and administrative agencies may take judicial notice of their official records without strict adherence to the rules of evidence.
Spouses Estela and Rodolfo Calderon reside at #31 Silverlane Street in Silverland Subdivision, Pasong Tamo, Tandang Sora, Quezon City, directly across from the home of spouses Joel and Annie Geronimo at #48 Silverlane Street. In May 2005, the Geronimos, together with Susan and Jonas Geronimo, constructed a building beside their residence which they represented as an extension house for family use but which was subsequently used as the Silverland Alliance Christian Church (SACC). The church conducted daily worship services, baptisms, summer school, choir rehearsals, band practices, and utilized loud sound systems until late evening, generating noise that allegedly affected the health of the …
Villafuerte vs. Robredo
10th December 2014
AK117784Memorandum circulars issued by the Department of the Interior and Local Government requiring local government units to publicly post detailed budgetary, financial, and procurement documents, and prescribing guidelines for the utilization of the 20% development fund component of the Internal Revenue Allotment, do not transgress constitutional guarantees of local autonomy and fiscal autonomy, provided they merely reiterate existing statutory mandates and implement the President's power of general supervision rather than exercising control or imposing new substantive restrictions beyond those contemplated by law.
In 1995, the Commission on Audit examined the utilization of Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) shares by local government units for the years 1993-1994 and found that substantial portions of the 20% development fund had been diverted to expenses properly chargeable against Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses, in violation of Section 287 of the Local Government Code of 1991. In response, the DILG issued Memorandum Circular No. 95-216 to prescribe policies on the development fund. On August 31, 2010, then-DILG Secretary Jesse M. Robredo issued Memorandum Circular No. 2010-83, requiring full disclosure of local budgets, finances, bids, and public offerings. On December 2, 2010, he issued M…
PAGCOR vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue
10th December 2014
AK605056PAGCOR's income derived from gaming operations is subject only to the five percent (5%) franchise tax under Section 13(2)(a) of P.D. 1869, as amended, in lieu of all other taxes, while its income from other related services is subject only to corporate income tax under Section 14(5) of P.D. 1869, as amended by R.A. No. 9337, the BIR having exceeded its authority in issuing administrative rules that conflict with the express provisions of PAGCOR's franchise.
PAGCOR operates gambling casinos, gaming clubs, and other similar recreation or amusement places under Presidential Decree No. 1869, as amended by Republic Act No. 9487. Its Charter classifies income into two distinct categories: (1) income from gaming operations under Section 13(2)(b), and (2) income from other related services under Section 14(5). Section 13(2)(a) imposes a 5% franchise tax on gross revenue from gaming operations "in lieu of all kinds of taxes," while Section 14(5) expressly subjects income from related services to income tax, excluding it from franchise tax application.
In 2005, Congress enacted R.A. No. 9337 amending the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (R.A. No.…
Oca vs. Custodio
3rd December 2014
AK729846A status quo order in an intra-corporate controversy may be issued only after hearing the parties and the posting of a bond, and is strictly limited to maintaining the last actual, peaceable, and uncontested state of things which preceded the controversy; it cannot direct the undoing of acts already consummated, which is the proper subject of mandatory injunctive relief requiring compliance with the stricter requirements of a verified application and bond under Rule 58 of the Rules of Court.
St. Francis School of General Trias, Cavite, Inc. (School) is a non-stock, non-profit educational institution established in 1973 with original incorporators including private respondent Laurita Custodio and petitioners Cirila Mojica and Josefina Pascual. In 1988, the School entered into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) with De La Salle Greenhills (DLSG) permitting the latter to exercise supervisory powers over academic affairs. Pursuant thereto, DLSG Brothers, including petitioners Bernard Oca and Dennis Magbanua, subsequently became members of the Board of Trustees and officers of the School. A dispute arose when Custodio opposed a proposed new MOA that would have expanded DLSG control ove…
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company vs. Ley Construction and Development Corporation
3rd December 2014
AK619941A petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court may raise only questions of law, not questions of fact; consequently, issues regarding the sufficiency of evidence to establish a cause of action by preponderance, which require an examination of the probative value of evidence, are improper subjects of review under said rule.
LCDC, a general contracting firm, applied with Philippine Banking Corporation (now Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company) for the opening of Letter of Credit No. DC 90-303-C in the amount of USD 802,500.00 to finance the importation of 15,000 metric tons of Iraqi cement from Global Enterprises Limited. The spouses Manuel and Janet Ley executed a Continuing Surety Agreement to guarantee LCDC’s obligations. After the LC was negotiated and the Bank’s account debited for USD 770,691.30, the Bank received shipping documents which were delivered to LCDC. LCDC executed a trust receipt acknowledging receipt of the documents. However, the cement shipment never arrived due to the United Nations trade e…
Mangaser vs. Ugay
3rd December 2014
AK498712Prior physical possession in forcible entry cases may be established through juridical acts—such as the execution and registration of public instruments, issuance of title under a free patent, and payment of real property taxes—not solely by actual physical occupation. Possession acquired through legal formalities that subject the property to the action of the owner's will satisfies the "prior physical possession" requirement in ejectment suits.
Petitioner Anacleto Mangaser is the registered owner of a 10,632-square-meter parcel of land in Santiago Sur, Caba, La Union, covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. RP-174 (FP-13 787) issued pursuant to a free patent under Commonwealth Act No. 141. Respondent Dionisio Ugay, claiming to have resided in the area since birth, constructed a residential house and installed a fence on a portion of the property in 2006, allegedly guided by concrete boundary monuments. Mangaser discovered the intrusion on October 31, 2006, and after failed barangay conciliation and ignored demands to vacate, filed a complaint for forcible entry on October 30, 2007.
People of the Philippines vs. Estibal
26th November 2014
AK202676Out-of-court statements made by a rape victim to authorities do not qualify as part of the res gestae when they are not spontaneous reactions to a startling occurrence but are instead deliberate re-tellings of past events made after the declarant has had sufficient time to reflect and has been emboldened by third parties to pursue prosecution; such statements are inadmissible hearsay that cannot sustain a conviction for rape in the absence of the victim's testimony.
Anecito Estibal y Calungsag, a 43-year-old security guard, lived with his wife BBB and their two children, including 13-year-old daughter AAA, in a one-room house in Taguig City. On February 5, 2009, AAA allegedly revealed to her cousin DDD that she had been sexually abused by her father since Grade III, including a rape that morning. With DDD's assistance, BBB confronted AAA, who confirmed the abuse. They then reported the incident to the Barangay Security Force and the police, leading to the accused's arrest that evening.
De Guzman, Jr. vs. People
26th November 2014
AK954478Intent to kill in frustrated homicide may be established through the overt and external acts and conduct of the offender before, during, and after the assault, or by the nature, location, and number of the wounds inflicted on the victim; without proof of such intent, the felony may only constitute serious physical injuries.
On December 24, 1997, at approximately ten o'clock in the evening, Alexander Flojo was fetching water below his rented house at 443 Aglipay Street, Old Zaniga St., Mandaluyong City when Alfredo De Guzman, Jr., the brother of his landlady, hit him on the nape. After the landlady apologized and instructed him to go upstairs, Flojo rested for about two hours. At around midnight, while Flojo had returned to fetch water, De Guzman suddenly appeared and stabbed him on the left face and chest, inflicting wounds that the attending physician testified would have been fatal without timely medical intervention.
Hermano Oil Manufacturing & Sugar Corporation vs. Toll Regulatory Board
26th November 2014
AK656978Government-owned and controlled corporations created under the Corporation Code, such as the PNCC, do not enjoy sovereign immunity from suit; however, courts are prohibited from issuing injunctions against government infrastructure projects under PD 1818 and RA 8975, and the establishment of access restrictions on limited access highways pursuant to RA 2000 constitutes a valid exercise of police power that does not require compensation under the power of eminent domain.
Hermano Oil Manufacturing & Sugar Corporation owned a parcel of land located at the right side of the Sta. Rita Exit of the North Luzon Expressway (NLEX) in Guiguinto, Bulacan, bounded by an access fence that prevented direct ingress to and egress from the expressway. The property was acquired by the petitioner in 1999 when the NLEX and the access fence were already in existence, and a portion of the land had previously been sold to the Republic of the Philippines in 1979 as indicated in the transfer certificate of title.
De Pedro vs. Romasan Development Corporation
26th November 2014
AK876240The filing of a motion for new trial or reconsideration constitutes voluntary appearance that cures a defect in the acquisition of jurisdiction over the person due to improper service of summons; moreover, a party who has availed herself of the ordinary remedies of new trial and certiorari and lost therein is barred from subsequently filing a petition for annulment of judgment under Rule 47 of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
Romasan Development Corporation owned a parcel of land in Antipolo City covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 236044, derived from Original Certificate of Title No. 438 issued as early as August 30, 1937. In November 1996, Romasan's representative discovered that Aurora De Pedro had erected fences on a portion of this property and claimed ownership based on Original Certificate of Title No. P-691 issued pursuant to Free Patent No. 045802-91-914 dated December 9, 1991. Investigation revealed that the Department of Environment and Natural Resources had issued free patents covering portions of Romasan's property to several individuals, including De Pedro, despite the property having bee…
PACE vs. Alibutdan-Diaz
26th November 2014
AK857965A lawyer may be suspended from the practice of law for engaging in dishonest or deceitful conduct in a non-legal capacity, such as serving as officer of a professional association, where such conduct demonstrates a lack of candor and integrity requisite for continued membership in the Bar.
Atty. Edna M. Alibutdan-Diaz served as National Treasurer of the Philippine Association of Court Employees (PACE), an umbrella organization of first and second level court employees. During her tenure, PACE held its 11th National Convention in Davao City in October 2005 and its 12th National Convention in Iloilo City in March 2007. As treasurer, Atty. Diaz was entrusted with the custody and management of all financial matters for these events. Following the 12th convention, questions arose regarding her handling of association funds, her eligibility to run for re-election, and her receipt of a term-end bonus approved by the outgoing board of directors.
Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company vs. Wilfred N. Chiok
26th November 2014
AK008740Manager's checks and cashier's checks are pre-accepted primary obligations of the issuing bank, regarded as substantially equivalent to cash, and cannot be countermanded or subjected to stop payment orders based solely on the purchaser's allegation of the payee's breach of a separate underlying contract; rescission under Article 1191 of the Civil Code operates only between the parties to the contract and cannot affect non-party issuing banks.
Wilfred N. Chiok engaged in dollar trading with Gonzalo B. Nuguid for several years, with transactions running into millions of pesos. Chiok maintained accounts with Metropolitan Bank and Trust Company (Metrobank) and Asian Banking Corporation (now Global Business Bank, Inc.). On July 5, 1995, Chiok purchased from Global Bank two manager's checks totaling ₱18,455,350.00 and from Metrobank one cashier's check for ₱7,613,000.00, all payable to "Gonzalo Bernardo" (Nuguid). Chiok deposited these checks in Nuguid's account with Far East Bank & Trust Company (FEBTC, now Bank of the Philippine Islands) as payment for US$1,022,288.50 that Nuguid was to deliver the same day. Nuguid failed to deliver…
Geroche, Garde and Marfil vs. People
26th November 2014
AK942829An accused who appeals from a sentence of conviction waives the constitutional safeguard against double jeopardy and throws the entire case open to appellate review, permitting the appellate court to modify the judgment by convicting the accused of the offense originally charged notwithstanding a prior acquittal therefor by the trial court.
On the evening of May 14, 1989, in Sitio New Lantawan, Barangay Greenhills, President Roxas, Cotabato, petitioners Edigardo Geroche (Barangay Captain), Roberto Garde, and Generoso Marfil (both members of the Citizen Armed Forces Geographical Unit or CAFGU), armed with garand rifles, forcibly entered the house of Baleriano Limbag. They broke down the main door, conducted a search without warrant or consent, mauled Limbag causing physical injuries, and seized his airgun. The incident occurred at approximately 10:00 p.m. while the occupants were sleeping.
Torres, Jr. vs. Lapinid
26th November 2014
AK447195A co-owner may validly sell his undivided share in co-owned property to a third party without the consent of the other co-owners, and such sale is effective to transfer the seller’s proportionate abstract interest to the buyer, who thereby becomes a co-owner in substitution of the seller. Even where the sale purports to convey a specific physical portion of the property prior to partition, the transaction is not void ab initio but operates to transfer only the seller’s ideal share equivalent to the consideration given, pursuant to the principle that contracts must be recognized as far as legally possible (quando res non valet ut ago, valeat quantum valere potest).
Vicente Torres, Jr., Carlos Velez, and Mariano Velez (petitioners) and Jesus Velez (respondent) are co-owners of several parcels of land in Carcar, Cebu, including Lot No. 4389 with an area of 19,018 square meters. In 1993, Jesus initiated a partition case against the other co-owners. Prior to the resolution of that case, Jesus acquired additional shares from other co-owners, consolidating his ownership to 73% of Lot No. 4389. On 9 November 1997, Jesus executed a deed of sale conveying 3,000 square meters of Lot No. 4389 to Lorenzo Lapinid (respondent), who took possession of a portion thereof. In 2001, the partition case was resolved through a compromise agreement authorizing Jesus, Marian…
People vs. Consorte
26th November 2014
AK763348Death of an accused pending appeal of his conviction extinguishes both his criminal liability and his civil liability ex delicto (civil liability based solely on the offense committed), provided the death occurs before final judgment, pursuant to Article 89(1) of the Revised Penal Code.
Accused-appellant Benjie Consorte y Franco was convicted for the murder of Elizabeth Palmar. The Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction on May 27, 2010. On July 9, 2014, the Supreme Court affirmed the appellate court's decision with modifications to the damages awarded. While his motion for reconsideration of this affirming decision was pending, Consorte died on July 14, 2014 at the New Bilibid Prison.
Ejercito vs. COMELEC
25th November 2014
AK736092A candidate may be disqualified from holding office for spending in excess of the authorized amount under Section 68(c) of the Omnibus Election Code through administrative proceedings that are summary in character and require only clear preponderance of evidence, without need of prior criminal conviction or preliminary investigation; contributions by third parties for campaign purposes made with the candidate's written acceptance constitute election expenditures attributable to the candidate and are subject to statutory limits.
Three days prior to the May 13, 2013 National and Local Elections, gubernatorial candidate Edgar "Egay" San Luis filed a petition for disqualification against incumbent Governor Emilio Ramon "E.R." Ejercito alleging two grounds: first, the distribution of "Orange Cards" providing free medical services to voters constituting vote-buying under Section 68(a) of the Omnibus Election Code; and second, campaign overspending under Section 68(c) for allegedly exceeding the authorized expenditure limit of P4,576,566.00. Despite the pending petition, Ejercito was proclaimed winner with 549,310 votes against San Luis' 471,209 votes.
Alcantara vs. Lim
25th November 2014
AK234612The right to life and security enjoys precedence over the right to property, and an ordinance purporting to exercise police power to promote general welfare is unconstitutional if it exposes densely populated communities to imminent catastrophic risk from hazardous industrial operations, notwithstanding claimed economic benefits or safety measures.
The Pandacan district in Manila, originally designated as an industrial zone in the 1920s, evolved into a densely populated residential and commercial area inhabited by approximately 84,000 residents, with schools enrolling over 15,000 students and Malacañang Palace situated approximately two kilometers away. Since the early 20th century, three major oil companies—Chevron Philippines, Inc., Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation, and Petron Corporation—operated terminals storing millions of liters of highly flammable petroleum products, supplying 95% of Metro Manila’s fuel requirements. Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the Sangguniang Panlungsod enacted Ordinance No. 8027 …
Goh vs. Bayron
25th November 2014
AK149386The 2014 General Appropriations Act provides a specific line-item appropriation for the conduct of recall elections under the "Operations" category, and the COMELEC Chairman is authorized to augment any deficiency therein from existing savings, provided the purpose of the appropriation is specific enough to allow the exercise of the constitutional mandate to conduct recall elections.
Alroben J. Goh filed a petition for recall against Mayor Lucilo R. Bayron of Puerto Princesa City, alleging loss of confidence due to gross violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, incompetence, and dereliction of duty. The COMELEC initially found the petition sufficient in form and substance but suspended proceedings citing lack of appropriations in the 2014 GAA for recall elections. The suspension was based on a memorandum from the Financial Services Department raising funding issues and the absence of a specific "contingency fund" for recall.
Philamlife vs. Secretary of Finance
24th November 2014
AK418435The Court of Tax Appeals has exclusive appellate jurisdiction over rulings of the Secretary of Finance reviewing the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's interpretative rulings under Section 4 of the NIRC; furthermore, sales of shares for less than their book value (fair market value) are subject to donor's tax as a "deemed gift" under Section 100 of the NIRC, irrespective of actual donative intent.
Philamlife, a life and general insurance company, decided to divest from the health maintenance organization industry by selling its 49.89% shareholding in PhilamCare Health Systems, Inc. The shares were sold through competitive bidding to STI Investments, Inc. in 2009 for USD 2,190,000. After paying capital gains taxes, Philamlife sought a tax clearance from the BIR, which instead demanded payment of donor's tax on the alleged gift resulting from the difference between the book value and the selling price.
People vs. Andrade
24th November 2014
AK775779When a motion to quash is grounded on the allegation that the facts charged do not constitute an offense, the trial court is mandated by Section 4, Rule 117 of the Rules of Court to give the prosecution an opportunity to correct the defect by amendment before granting the motion to dismiss; the court may not dismiss outright nor may it consider grounds other than those stated in the motion, except lack of jurisdiction.
In 2003, the Bureau of Corrections conducted a random drug test among inmates of the National Bilibid Prison. Twenty-one inmates, including the respondents, tested positive for methamphetamine hydrochloride ("shabu"). The Department of Justice subsequently filed informations charging them with violation of Section 15, Article II of Republic Act No. 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002) for using dangerous drugs.
Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V. Rotterdam and The East Asiatic Co., Ltd. vs. Glow Laks Enterprises, Ltd.
19th November 2014
AK648388A common carrier's extraordinary responsibility for goods transported continues until actual or constructive delivery to the consignee or the person entitled to receive them; delivery solely to port or customs authorities does not terminate this responsibility. Foreign laws must be proven in accordance with Section 24 of Rule 132 of the Revised Rules of Court through official publication or properly attested and certified copies; otherwise, the processual presumption applies that such foreign law is identical to Philippine law.
Petitioner Nedlloyd Lijnen B.V. Rotterdam, a foreign corporation engaged in shipping, loaded 343 cartons of garments belonging to respondent Glow Laks Enterprises, Ltd. at the Port of Manila for transport to Colon, Free Zone, Panama. Upon arrival at the Port of Colon, the goods were turned over to the National Ports Authority pursuant to alleged Panamanian law. Unauthorized persons subsequently secured the release of the goods using falsified bills of lading, resulting in the loss of the shipment valued at US$53,640.00.
Dela Cruz vs. People of the Philippines
19th November 2014
AK010439Self-defense is unavailable where the alleged unlawful aggression has ceased and the means employed are grossly disproportionate to the perceived threat. When an accused successfully disarms an alleged aggressor, any subsequent use of deadly force constitutes retaliation, not self-defense; moreover, the rational equivalence between the means of attack and defense requires that a firearm cannot be reasonably employed against a non-lethal fire extinguisher when the accused had opportunity to retreat or seek assistance.
Petitioner Sherwin Dela Cruz, married to Darlene Dela Cruz who was employed at Sykes Asia Inc., discovered his wife's alleged illicit relationship with the victim, Jeffrey Wernher L. Gonzales, a coworker at the same company. On New Year's Day, petitioner went to the Sykes Asia office located at the 25th Floor of Robinson's Summit Center, Ayala Avenue, Makati City, purportedly to fetch his wife. A fatal confrontation occurred between petitioner and the victim at the latter's workstation, resulting in the victim's death from a single gunshot wound to the forehead.
Laud vs. People of the Philippines
19th November 2014
AK591092A judge who has been administratively divested of his position as Vice-Executive Judge may nevertheless validly issue a search warrant as a de facto officer, and search warrant applications for heinous crimes filed by the Philippine National Police before the Regional Trial Courts of Manila or Quezon City constitute an exception to the "compelling reasons" requirement under Section 2, Rule 126 of the Rules of Court, permitting enforcement outside the territorial jurisdiction of the issuing court.
The Philippine National Police applied before the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 50, for a warrant to search three caves located inside the Laud Compound in Purok 3, Barangay Ma-a, Davao City. The application sought the remains of victims allegedly summarily executed by the "Davao Death Squad" in December 2005. Ernesto Avasola testified that he personally witnessed the killing of six persons and participated in burying the bodies. Judge William Simon P. Peralta, acting as Vice-Executive Judge, issued Search Warrant No. 09-14407 on July 15, 2009, which was subsequently enforced by the PNP-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group.
Crescencio vs. People of the Philippines
19th November 2014
AK343078Possession of timber or other forest products without the legal documents required under existing forest laws and regulations constitutes a malum prohibitum offense punishable as qualified theft, where mere possession without proper documentation consummates the crime regardless of the legality of the source; and where the prosecution fails to prove the value of the forest products beyond mere uncorroborated estimates, the minimum penalty under Article 309(6) of the Revised Penal Code shall apply, increased by two degrees pursuant to Article 310.
DENR Forest Protection Unit Chief Eufemio Abaniel, acting on information regarding a stockpile of lumber at Balico, Talibon, Bohol, proceeded to the residence of Ma. Mimie Crescencio on March 15, 1994, accompanied by Forest Rangers Urcino Butal, Alfredo Bastasa, and Celso Ramos. Upon arrival, they observed forest products lying under the petitioner's house and at the shoreline approximately two meters away. When questioned regarding ownership, the petitioner admitted the lumber belonged to her but failed to produce legal documents authorizing possession, presenting instead an official receipt that did not correspond to the species and dimensions of the seized lumber.
Mackay vs. Caswell
17th November 2014
AK336008Under Article 1715 of the Civil Code, a contractor who executes work with defects that destroy or lessen its value or fitness for its ordinary or stipulated use may be required to remove the defect or execute another work; if the contractor fails or refuses, the employer may have the defect removed at the contractor’s cost, and the employer’s demand for rectification need not be in a particular form but may be satisfied by substantial efforts to communicate with the contractor to correct the flaws.
Spouses Dana and Cerelina Caswell engaged Owen Prosper A. Mackay to install electrical lines in their newly constructed home in San Narciso, Zambales, for a lump sum contract price of ₱250,000.00. After paying ₱227,000.00, the Caswells discovered that the installation contained numerous technical deficiencies preventing the local electric cooperative, Zambales II Electric Cooperative (Zameco II), from energizing the residence. Owen could not be located to rectify the defects, prompting the Caswells to engage Zameco II to correct the work at their own expense.
Daging vs. Davis
12th November 2014
AK795854The prohibition against representing conflicting interests under Rule 15.03 of the Code of Professional Responsibility is absolute and extends to all members of a law firm, such that a lawyer cannot represent a party adverse to his firm's client even if he claims no personal knowledge of the client's confidences, and good faith or lack of intent to betray the client is not a defense.
Daria O. Daging operated the Nashville Country Music Lounge in Baguio City under a lease from Benjie Pinlac. On March 7, 2005, she entered into a Retainer Agreement with Davis & Sabling Law Office, represented by Atty. Riz Tingalon L. Davis and Atty. Amos Saganib Sabling, for legal services concerning her business. Due to rental delinquencies, Pinlac terminated the lease and arranged for Novie Balageo to take over the bar operations, which were subsequently renamed Amarillo Music Bar.
SMI-Ed Philippines Technology, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
12th November 2014
AK719499A PEZA-registered corporation that has never commenced operations is not entitled to fiscal incentives under Republic Act No. 7916, including the 5% preferential tax rate on gross income, and remains subject to ordinary tax rates under the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997; moreover, Section 27(D)(5) of the NIRC 1997 imposes 6% capital gains tax only on sales of lands and/or buildings, excluding machineries and equipment, which are subject to ordinary corporate income tax.
SMI-Ed Philippines Technology, Inc. was incorporated and registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) on June 29, 1998, authorized to engage in manufacturing ultra high-density microprocessor unit packages. Following registration, petitioner constructed buildings and purchased machineries and equipment totaling ₱3,150,925,917.00 as of December 31, 1999. Due to the Asian financial crisis, petitioner failed to commence commercial operations and temporarily closed its factory on October 15, 1999. On August 1, 2000, petitioner sold its buildings and installed machineries to Ibiden Philippines, Inc., another PEZA-registered enterprise, for ¥2,100,000,000.00 (₱893,550,000.00). Pe…
Sydeco vs. People
12th November 2014
AK075332A motorist's refusal to submit to a body and vehicle search at a checkpoint, absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, constitutes an exercise of the constitutional right against unreasonable searches and cannot be penalized as resistance or disobedience under Article 151 of the Revised Penal Code. Additionally, the presumption of regularity in the performance of official duties by police officers is rebutted when they deviate from statutory procedures and employ excessive force.
On June 11, 2006, at approximately 3:00 a.m., petitioner Edmund Sydeco was driving a red Ford Ranger pick-up along Roxas Boulevard corner Quirino Avenue, Malate, Manila, accompanied by two companions. Police officers manning a checkpoint flagged him down. According to the police, Sydeco was swerving and smelled of liquor. According to Sydeco, the officers ordered him and his companions to alight for a body and vehicle search, which he refused, citing a previous extortion experience and insisting on a "plain view" search only. This led to a confrontation where the police allegedly punched him and pointed a gun at him before arresting him.
Orion Savings Bank vs. Suzuki
12th November 2014
AK591181A party claiming priority in a double sale scenario under Article 1544 of the Civil Code must prove the due execution and validity of the prior conveyance, and failure to annotate a real estate transaction, coupled with the vendor's continued possession and the claimant's delay in asserting ownership rights, constitutes badges of fraud that defeat the claim of a prior valid sale.
In August 2003, Shigekane Suzuki, a Japanese national, negotiated to purchase Condominium Unit No. 536 and Parking Slot No. 42 at Cityland Pioneer, Mandaluyong City, from Yung Sam Kang, a Korean national holding a Special Resident Retiree's Visa (SRRV). After paying ₱2.8 million and executing a Deed of Absolute Sale dated August 26, 2003, Suzuki took possession and commenced renovation. Kang failed to deliver the certificates of title, claiming they were held by Orion Savings Bank for safekeeping. Suzuki discovered that while the condominium title bore a cancelled mortgage to Orion from 1999 and a PRA restriction requiring approval for any conveyance, it showed no current encumbrance; the p…
Pestilos vs. Generoso
10th November 2014
AK759021A warrantless arrest under Section 5(b), Rule 113 is valid when: (1) an offense has just been committed; and (2) the arresting officer has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it, where "personal knowledge" encompasses facts or circumstances gathered through the officer's immediate observation and evaluation at the scene of the crime shortly after its commission, and "probable cause" signifies reasonable grounds of suspicion supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to warrant a cautious person to believe the accused is guilty.
Atty. Moreno Generoso resided on Kasiyahan Street, Barangay Holy Spirit, Quezon City, in the same neighborhood as petitioners Joey Pestilos, Dwight Macapanas, Miguel Gaces, Jerry Fernandez, and Ronald Munoz. In the early morning hours of February 20, 2005, an altercation erupted between Atty. Generoso and the petitioners, resulting in Atty. Generoso sustaining stab wounds and bruises from a mauling.
Imasen vs. Alcon and Papa
22nd October 2014
AK774902Engaging in sexual intercourse inside company premises during work hours constitutes serious misconduct under Article 282 (now Article 296) of the Labor Code, satisfying the requisites of: (a) being of grave and aggravated character and not merely trivial; (b) relating to the performance of the employee's duties showing unfitness to continue working for the employer; and (c) being performed with wrongful intent, thereby justifying dismissal even for first-time offenders.
Imasen Philippine Manufacturing Corporation, a domestic corporation engaged in the manufacture of auto seat-recliners and slide-adjusters, employed respondents Ramonchito T. Alcon and Joann S. Papa as manual welders in 2001. On October 5, 2002, while working the second shift from 8:00 pm to 5:00 am, the respondents were discovered by a security guard having sexual intercourse on the floor of the company's "Tool and Die" section using a piece of carton as a mattress. The incident occurred at approximately 12:40 am when the respondents were expected to be at their workstations. Following an administrative investigation where the respondents claimed they were merely sleeping, the company termi…
Enrile vs. Manalastas
22nd October 2014
AK207476The remedy against the denial of a motion to quash is for the accused to enter a plea, proceed to trial, and should the decision be adverse, reiterate the issue on appeal and assign the denial as error; certiorari is not available because the denial is an interlocutory order and other adequate remedies exist in the ordinary course of law. Additionally, an information for less serious physical injuries is sufficient if it alleges that the victim was incapacitated for labor or required medical attendance for ten days or more, even if supported only by medical certificates showing probable healing periods, as the actual duration is an evidentiary matter to be proven during trial.
On January 18, 2003, a mauling incident occurred outside the house of petitioners Godofredo Enrile and Dr. Frederick Enrile in St. Francis Subdivision, Barangay Pandayan, Meycauayan, Bulacan. Claiming to be the victims, Josefina Guinto Morano, Rommel Morano, and Perla Beltran Morano filed criminal charges against the petitioners and one Alfredo Enrile for frustrated homicide (Rommel) and less serious physical injuries (Josefina and Perla).
Luspo vs. People
22nd October 2014
AK249952A public officer who performs a purely ministerial duty, such as signing a document to effect a fund release pursuant to a valid delegation of authority, cannot be held criminally liable under Section 3(e) of R.A. 3019 absent proof of corrupt motive or bad faith. Conversely, officers who facilitate the disbursement of funds for a fictitious transaction by circumventing mandatory documentation and auditing rules act with evident bad faith and manifest partiality.
The case stems from a Commission on Audit report on disbursement irregularities within the PNP. An investigation revealed that in August 1992, two Advices of Sub-Allotment (ASAs) totaling P10 million were issued purportedly for the purchase of Combat, Clothing, and Individual Equipment (CCIE) for the North Capital Command. The funds were swiftly converted into 100 checks payable to four enterprises owned by a single private individual, Margarita Tugaoen, who encashed them without delivering any supplies.
Pulgar vs. Resurreccion and Eugenio
21st October 2014
AK276765A court employee who usurps the functions of a commissioner by receiving evidence ex parte without being a member of the bar, and who illegally exacts money from litigants under the guise of commissioner's fees, commits grave misconduct warranting dismissal from the service even for a first offense.
Atty. Frumencio E. Pulgar served as counsel for the petitioner in Civil Case No. 95-079, an annulment of marriage proceeding pending before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Branch 276, Muntinlupa City. On February 26, 1997, Atty. Pulgar presented the petitioner's evidence ex parte. Paul M. Resurreccion, then Court Interpreter and Acting Branch Clerk of Court of said branch, received the evidence despite not being a lawyer. Resurreccion demanded ₱5,000 from Atty. Pulgar as payment for the ex parte proceeding—₱2,000 paid directly by Atty. Pulgar and ₱3,000 delivered the next day by Atty. Pulgar's liaison officer, also without receipt. When the petition was subsequently denied, Resurreccion pub…
Barrido vs. Nonato
20th October 2014
AK223197Article 147 of the Family Code governs the property relations of parties in a void marriage who are capacitated to marry each other and who lived exclusively as husband and wife, creating a regime of equal co-ownership where property acquired during the union is presumed to have been obtained through joint efforts, and upon dissolution, the property is divided according to the rules on co-ownership under the Civil Code rather than the liquidation procedures under Article 129 applicable to valid marriages.
Leonardo V. Nonato and Marietta N. Barrido contracted marriage and acquired a house and lot in Eroreco, Bacolod City during its subsistence. On March 15, 1996, their marriage was declared void on the ground of psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code. Following the declaration of nullity, Nonato demanded partition of the conjugal property, but Barrido refused, claiming the property had been sold to their children.
PLDT vs. Estranero
15th October 2014
AK736031An employer cannot deduct an employee's outstanding loan obligations from wages or redundancy pay unless authorized by law or by the employee's written authorization under Article 113 of the Labor Code; set-off or legal compensation is impermissible where the employer is not the employee's creditor, and labor tribunals lack jurisdiction over civil disputes involving debtor-creditor relations distinct from the employer-employee relationship.
PLDT adopted a company-wide Manpower Reduction Program (MRP) in 1995 aimed at reducing its workforce by offering redundancy packages to affected employees. Under this program, employees with less than fifteen years of service were entitled to separation pay equivalent to 200% of their basic monthly salary for every year of service. Henry Estranero, hired on July 1, 1995 as an Auto-Mechanic/Electrician Helper in the Fleet Management Division, was included in this program when his position was declared redundant due to a significant decrease in company vehicles and equipment requiring mechanical servicing.
Marcos vs. Heirs of Bangi and Diccion
15th October 2014
AK301132An oral partition of an estate is valid and enforceable when it has been consummated by the heirs' taking possession in severalty and the exercise of ownership over their respective portions, even in the absence of a written instrument; long possession in severalty raises a presumption of partition that equity will recognize and enforce.
Alipio Bangi died in 1918, leaving a parcel of land in San Manuel, Pangasinan covered by Original Certificate of Title (OCT) No. 22361. He was survived by his children Eusebio, Espedita, and Jose Bangi. In 1943, Eusebio executed a Deed of Absolute Sale conveying a one-third portion of the subject property to his relatives, the spouses Isidro Bangi and Genoveva Diccion. The respondents, heirs of Isidro and Genoveva, took possession of the purchased portion. In 1995, the petitioners, who are Eusebio's children and heirs, caused the registration of two Deeds of Absolute Sale—dated August 10, 1995 and November 21, 1995—purporting to convey the entire property including the one-third portion sol…
Castro vs. Gregorio
15th October 2014
AK488810An adoption decree rendered without personal notice to the spouse and legitimate children of the adopter, whose consent is required by Republic Act No. 8552, is void for lack of jurisdiction; moreover, fraud employed specifically to prevent interested parties from participating in adoption proceedings constitutes extrinsic fraud under Rule 47 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, regardless of whether such fraud involved forged documents or perjured testimony presented during the trial.
Atty. Jose Castro, a prominent lawyer from Ilocos Norte and estranged husband of Rosario Mata Castro, maintained a separate household with Lilibeth Fernandez Gregorio, allegedly his former housekeeper, with whom he had two children, respondents Jose Maria Jed Lemuel Gregorio and Ana Maria Regina Gregorio. Despite having a legitimate daughter, Joanne, with Rosario, Jose filed a petition for adoption in 2000 seeking to legitimize his relationship with respondents, falsely declaring in his petition that he and Rosario were childless and attaching a fraudulent affidavit purporting to show Rosario's consent.
Cruz y Bartolome vs. People
8th October 2014
AK683970Mere climbing on top of a naked female, embracing her, and touching her vagina and breasts without proof of the erectile penis being in a position to penetrate constitutes acts of lasciviousness, not attempted rape; the intent to lie with the female, which must be demonstrated through direct overt acts showing the penis capable of penetration touching the external genitalia, is the essential element distinguishing attempted rape from acts of lasciviousness.
Norberto Cruz y Bartolome and his wife Belinda employed AAA (15 years old) and BBB to assist in selling plastic and glass wares during the Bangar, La Union fiesta on December 20, 1993. After setting up tents near the municipal hall for the victims to sleep in, petitioner allegedly sexually assaulted AAA in the early morning hours of December 21, 1993, leading to criminal charges for attempted rape and acts of lasciviousness.
Rosaldes vs. People
8th October 2014
AK658519Not every instance of the laying of hands on a child constitutes the crime of child abuse under Section 10(a) of Republic Act No. 7610; only when the laying of hands is shown beyond reasonable doubt to be intended by the accused to debase, degrade or demean the intrinsic worth and dignity of the child as a human being should it be punished as child abuse. Otherwise, it is punished under the Revised Penal Code.
On February 13, 1996, at Pughanan Elementary School in Lambunao, Iloilo, petitioner Felina Rosaldes, a Grade 1 public schoolteacher, was sleeping on a bamboo sofa inside the classroom when her seven-year-old pupil Michael Ryan Gonzales accidentally bumped her knee while hurriedly entering the room. Roused from sleep, Rosaldes demanded an apology, but when the child proceeded to his seat instead of obeying, she subjected him to severe physical maltreatment that resulted in physical injuries certified by a physician and caused the child to lose consciousness.
Ching and Powing Properties, Inc. vs. Cheng, Cheng, Igne and Santos
8th October 2014
AK117034The "two-dismissal rule" under Rule 17, Section 1 of the Rules of Civil Procedure applies only to dismissals effected at the instance of the plaintiff, and not to dismissals granted upon a defendant's motion to dismiss under Rule 16; therefore, a prior dismissal for lack of jurisdiction upon a defendant's motion does not bar a subsequent dismissal without prejudice when the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the re-filed action before the defendant files an answer.
Antonio Ching owned businesses and properties valued at over ₱380 million, including Po Wing Properties, Incorporated. While unmarried, he had children with two women: Ramon Ching (with Lucina Santos) and Joseph Cheng and Jaime Cheng (with Mercedes Igne). Following Antonio Ching's murder on July 18, 1996, disputes arose regarding the distribution of his estate. Ramon Ching allegedly induced Mercedes Igne and her children to sign a waiver of their rights to the estate in exchange for ₱22.5 million, which they claimed was never paid. On October 29, 1996, Ramon Ching allegedly executed an affidavit of settlement of estate naming himself as sole heir. Ramon Ching became the primary suspect in A…
Carinan vs. Cueto
8th October 2014
AK882614A donation of money exceeding ₱5,000 must be made in writing to be valid; absent compliance with the formal requirements of Article 748 of the New Civil Code, a claim of gratuitous donation fails where the evidence demonstrates an expectation of repayment and the prevention of unjust enrichment requires reimbursement of the amounts advanced.
Esperanza Carinan and her late husband Jose acquired rights over a 180-square-meter parcel of land in Biñan, Laguna from Roberto Ventura in 1986 through a Deed of Assignment and Transfer of Rights with Assumption of Obligations, assuming the obligation to pay monthly amortizations to the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS). By 2005, unpaid amortizations threatened the cancellation of the conditional sale. Esperanza, then a widow, sought financial assistance from her brother Gavino Cueto. The respondents paid Esperanza’s total obligation of ₱785,680.37 to the GSIS, plus additional expenses for the transfer of title and property renovation. Esperanza surrendered Transfer Certificate of…
Garcia vs. Ferro Chemicals, Inc.
1st October 2014
AK358468Jurisdiction over criminal cases is determined by the imposable penalty stated in the information and cannot be conferred by waiver or silence of the parties; where the penalty is arresto mayor (imprisonment of one month and one day to six months), the Metropolitan Trial Court has exclusive jurisdiction, not the Regional Trial Court. Consequently, all proceedings conducted by a court without jurisdiction are null and void.
Antonio Garcia executed a Deed of Absolute Sale and Purchase of Shares of Stock with Ferro Chemicals, Inc. on July 15, 1988, transferring various corporate shares including a class "A" share in Alabang Country Club, Inc. and a proprietary membership in Manila Polo Club, Inc. The transaction was allegedly structured to prevent these assets from being sold at public auction to satisfy Antonio Garcia's outstanding obligations to creditors. On March 3, 1989, the parties executed a Deed of Right of Repurchase allowing Antonio Garcia to redeem the shares within 180 days. Before the period expired, Antonio Garcia attempted to exercise his right to repurchase, but Ferro Chemicals refused. Subsequen…
People of the Philippines vs. Dela Cruz
1st October 2014
AK533556Non-compliance with the chain of custody requirements under Section 21 of Republic Act No. 9165, without justifiable grounds, constitutes a failure to establish the identity of the corpus delicti and warrants acquittal, particularly where law enforcers keep seized miniscule amounts of dangerous drugs in their personal pockets without conducting the required physical inventory and photographing in the presence of the accused or the witnesses mandated by law.
On September 14, 2004, the Zamboanga City Police Office conducted a buy-bust operation targeting accused-appellant Garry dela Cruz based on a tip from a civilian informant that a certain "Gary" was selling illegal drugs at the parking area for buses behind Food Mart on Governor Lim Street, Sangali, Bunguioa, Zamboanga City. The operation was coordinated by PO1 Wilfredo Bobon as poseur-buyer and SPO1 Roberto Roca as back-up arresting officer. The team prepared a ₱100.00 bill with serial number KM 776896 as marked money, with PO1 Bobon signaling consummation of the sale by removing his bull cap.
Vivares vs. St. Theresa's College
29th September 2014
AK161082The right to informational privacy in online social network (OSN) activities is not automatic; a user must manifest an intention to keep posts private through the positive employment of privacy tools and settings. Absent proof that privacy settings were utilized to limit access—such as the "Only Me" or "Custom" settings—there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in Facebook posts, even under the "Friends Only" setting, due to the inherent nature of social networking sites that facilitate sharing, tagging, and interaction among users.
Minor students of St. Theresa's College (STC) in Cebu City posted digital photographs of themselves on Facebook wearing only brassieres and undergarments, some depicting them drinking liquor and smoking in public places. These images were uploaded by one of the students and allegedly viewable by their Facebook friends. A computer teacher at STC discovered the photos through her students' Facebook accounts, reported them to school officials, and the students were subsequently sanctioned for violating the school's Student Handbook provisions on immoral conduct, possession of alcoholic drinks outside campus, and inappropriate apparel. The students were barred from participating in the commence…
Dela Torre vs. Imbuido
29th September 2014
AK990687In medical negligence cases, the plaintiff must prove by competent expert testimony the standard of care, the physician's breach thereof, and the causal connection between such breach and the injury, where the expert must possess specialization in the relevant field and base opinions on complete medical information including the patient's history and condition during treatment, not merely on limited autopsy findings.
Carmen Castillo Dela Torre was admitted to Divine Spirit General Hospital in Olongapo City on February 2, 1992, for delivery of her full-term pregnancy. Following unsuccessful labor, Dr. Nestor Pasamba performed a caesarian section on February 3, 1992. Post-operatively, Carmen developed abdominal pain, difficulty urinating, and progressive abdominal distension initially attributed to urinary tract infection and flatulence. A second surgery (exploratory laparotomy) was performed on February 12, 1992, to address suspected intestinal obstruction. Carmen died on February 13, 1992. While the hospital certificate attributed death to cardio-respiratory arrest secondary to cerebrovascular accident …