Library
Court of Tax Appeals decisions
8,629 decisions · 1954–2026
8,629 decisions
Newest first
- 7 Z Visayan Electric Company, Inc. vs. = Gcalcas Case No, et al. CTA Case No. 1439
- Republic Ef the Philippines Court of Tax Appeals Menila Philippines International | Surety Co., Inc. vs. EO Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 734
- Republic of. the Philippines Court of T P:/.. Appeals Manila' Bienvenido Capulong, et al. vs. Case No. 868 Acting Oow~Issioner of Customs CTA Case No. 868
- Bienvenido Capulong vs. < Case No. 867 Acting Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 867
- Republic of the Philippine·S COUFI.T of Tax Appeals Manil~ FER.L\1in Sare vs. The Commissioner of Customs» CTA Case No. 857
- CTA Case No. 847 CTA Case No. 847
- Y ~ vs. ~- CeTede CABE Ho, et al. CTA Case No. 537
- Iikp'Uftl1c Op the PHILI.PILI--Ilol._ Wurt of Tax App~.A.NL&..4 Philippine Amusement Enterprises, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 718
- A Rasilan Estates, Inc. vs. = C.TEAE Case No. 986 L Commissioner of Internal. Revenue CTA Case No. 986
- Farm Implement & Machinery Co vs. / Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 842
- LITTON & CO., INC., et al. vs. eo CeTeAe CASE NO, et al. CTA Case No. 784
- Extpjs I Ve..:Titerptu Ses Corp- Oration, et al. vs. The COMI.USSIOL\Jee of Custoi Ls CTA Case No. 860
- ' Republic of:·the ?Hilipph:N:S Court of Ta,X AP.T>Eals Wj,I:~;.-Hia Fe. Mh~ S:{E vs. Ti:"Oteo Y. Aseron CTA Case No. 866
- CTA Case No. 1158 CTA Case No. 1158
- Manila Railroad Company vs. The Board of Assessment Appeals of Dagupan City CTA Case No. 666
- CTA Case No. 137 CTA Case No. 137
- 1utt"'Ujsl1c of' T H:T! P Hllll"'RL.P&_III. Cdurt of Ta.. Appeal.! Jose G. Longa, et al. vs. Jose Abanas, et al. CTA Case No. 653
- ISAAC CAMRRO vs. « CASB HO. 1153 THE COMESSTONER or nl sp? Respondents “Meow ewe eee Se & | DECISTONR This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Customs affirming the decision of the Acting Collector of Customs for the Port of Manila requiring petitioner and his surety to pay, jointly and severally, in cash the am of P2,723«33e Petitioner is the claimant of a package of feather dusters and six packages of rattan split which arrived on BOARD 8/5 Talleyrand on June 28, 195% from Hongkong Customs recs, pp. 109-110. Peti- tioner having failed to present a release cortifi« cate iesued by the Central Bank of the Philippines or any of its quthorized agent banks for said goods, seizuro and forfeiture proceedings were commenced against the goods for violation of Central Bank Cir culars Nos, ‘+ and 45 in relation te Section 1363 of the fevised idministrative Code, Section 1 of Cireular No, ++ providcess Upon application by potitioner, the goods in question were released uniter Bond Nos 276% of the Century ee - ee ~ a i CTA Case No. 1153
- Estanisiao Mn. Leuterio vs. Commissioner of Custcms CTA Case No. 977
- CTA Case No. 1241 CTA Case No. 1241
- Mepublic of the Phibsrrincs Gourt of Tax Apprals Manila. Andres E. Iazaro vs. “ Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 833
- CTA Case No. 787 CTA Case No. 787
- Limpan Investment Oorporation T vs. Case No. 699 the Oommlssioner of Internal Revenue, et al. CTA Case No. 699
- I! Iio"'Q L.I'C <'JP.T1 L' C::Ourt of Tax T.T.ANIL V. E. Lednicky and Maria Valero Lednicky vs. Vs. Conmission.._~, et al. CTA Case No. 783
- Oe —the Philuppinad Court of Tax Appeals \ Urban Estates by Petitionss, et al. vs. E Case No, et al.Amended decision CTA Case No. 640