Supreme Court · En Banc
0Justice Concepcion
En Banc
[ G.R. No. L-27365, January 30, 1970 ]
♦ Decision, Makalintal, [J] ♦ Dissenting Opinion, Teehankee, [J] ♦ Concurring Opinion, Concepcion, [CJ] FELIX L. LAZO, MERCEDES CASTRO DE LAZO, and JOSE ROBLES, plaintiffs-appellees,
vs.
REPUBLIC SURETY & INSURANCE CO., INC. represented by ANTONIO M. KOH, General Manager and as Attorney-in-Fact of plaintiffs, FELIX and MERCEDES LAZO, defendants-appellants.
Felix L. Lazo for himself and his co-plaintiffs-appellees.
Jose S. Sarte for other plaintiff-appellee.
Koh Law Offices for defendants-appellants.
Separate Opinions
I concur in the view of Mr. Justice Teehankee to the effect that plaintiffs had not intended to waive their right to redeem within the period set forth in Sec. 34 of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court, as consistently construed by us in the cases cited in the foregoing dissent, and that, accordingly, the present action has been seasonably filed.