Sapublic of the Fhilippined Court of Tax Appeals Asturias Sugar Central, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

DECISION -

CTA CASE NO . 671 2 house in Dumalag , Capiz , to its warehouse in Iloilo City.

The cost of the containers amounted to ¥243,- 714. 12 and the freight charges and handling expenses to ~153 ,408. 72.

On November 25, 1953 , respondent determined against petitioner a deficiency percentage tax and surcharge for the period from December 1949 to June 30 , 1951 , in the sum of ¥3 ,835. 21 , plus ~50 . 00 com- promise penalt • (See Exhibit 112, 11 pp . 182- 183, BIR rec. Vol. I) On July 12, 1957, respondent effected the collect- ion of the assessed amount by the application of a certain refundable amount in favor of petitioner. (See P• 182, BIR rec . Vol. II) Subsequently, on August 18 , 1959, petitioner filed a claim for refund of said amount of ~3 , 885 . 2 1. (See Exhibit n9 ,u pp . 206- 207 , BIR rec . Vol. I)

This

claim v1as denied by respondent on May 11 , 19 59 .

(See

Exhibit tt10," p. 208, BIR rec . Vol. I) On June 12, 1959, the instant petition for review was filed by petitioner .

The only issue involved in this case is whether or not the freight charges and handling expenses in- curred by petitioner in transporting the sugar in ques- tion from Dumalag , Capiz , to Iloilo City should be deducted from the selling price in Iloilo City in computing the 2% miller's tax under Section 189 of the Tax Code .

DECISION -

CTA CASE NO . 671 3 This case is on all fours with a previous one decided bJr this Court, wherein we said: "In the present case, the sugar in question was not actually sold when it left petitioner's sugar central or mill warehouse .

Hance, the only possible legal basis for computing the miller's percentage tax was its 'market value' when it left the sugar central or mill warehouse of the petitioner in Dumalag, Capiz.

11Inasmuch as there is no proof of the actual market value of the sugar when the same left the sugar central or mill warehouse , and on the contrary, the evidence shows that there were no buyers of sugar in commercial quantities in the town of Dumalag , Capiz , we believe and so hold that the petitioner correctly deducted the freight charges and handling expenses incurred in transporting the sugar in question from its mill warehouse in Dumalag , Capiz , to its subsidiary ware- house in Iloilo City from the actual Iloi- ilo City selling prices in computing the 2% miller ' s tax.

To hold otherwise and include the freight charges and handling expenses as part of the taxable basis for computing the miller ' s tax, as insisted by the respondent , would be tantamount to assessing the tax on the basis of the sugar ' s market value in Iloilo City, and not. in Dumalag , Capiz, and would there- for& be contrary to law.

To our mind , the petitioner in the case at bar , com- puted its 2% miller ' s tax liability in accordance with law, using as the basis the fair and equitable market value of the sugar at the time it left it ' s mill ware- house in Dumalag , Capiz. 11

(Asturias Sugar

Central, Inc. vs . Com. of Internal Revenue, C. T. A. No . 983 , Feb. 14, 1963) In the light of the above ruling , it is clear that the freight charges and handling expenses in- curred by petitioner in transporting its sugar from Dumalag , Capiz to Iloilo City should have been de- ducted from the selling price in Iloilo City in (1~

DECISION -

CTA CASE NO . 671 4 computing the miller's 2% tax for the period in question.

Consequently, petitioner is entitled to the refund of the amount asked.

However, respondent Com- missioner is not liable for interest thereon as the collection was not attended with arbitrariness . (Collector of Internal Revenue vs. Prieto, et al., G. R. N~. L-11976, September 26 , 1961) ~REFORE , respondent is hereby ordered to refund to petitioner Asturias Sugar Central, Inc. the sum of ¥3,885. 21 .

Without p~onouncement as to costs .

~~NABLE• ~

WE CONCUR:

ROMAN M. UMALI

Associate Judge

Presiding Judge