Court of Tax Appeals
0LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, et al. vs. with principal office at ham, et al.
REPUBLIC GF THE PHILTPPINES
COURT GF TAX APPEALS
QUEZON CITy
LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE
FACTORY, (I[Ne.,
Petitioner,
C.TLA. CASE HO. S466
COMMISSIONER Of INTERNAL ALYVERNUE , Pramulgated:
—s
Spend fie
atieyediy fave been e@rpoeneousty paid by the petitioner on
iia bulk purchases of stemined-ieaf tobaccea from foreign
Popa aintubachur sta.
seppor ation cduly organized and
ex doting oeler Fall ipp ine favs with principal office at
ham, i, Weal Serpe boe Road, Faranague, Metro Manila. ih
iS ehyag ae pfs importation ane Peual purchase af
Si epined leaf towacue which it Uses AS & raw material tn
the precuetion and tanufacture ef eigar and cigarettes.
ort
P
ma,
ve
1
r
hmpte.
peed Phe month ee Marah Pear petitioner ailegedty
bedaw fished amounts of
Spe ibio tavres oi petlitioner ss bulk purchases of stemmed
reas
beat toebaoan Pram fopeign tobaceea manufacturers, as
95 2044548 15
GS 2044545 QO0
95 2O4abag 7S
ig
oft
ig
AO
wo
Op ~) Ow
co
a
Wo
it
oe
Ab
=
‘
foaee and Oetober 2, 1996,
petitioned Fliedowpatben claims for pefuncd and an amended
rs
ae”
.
~
—~
‘
oe
=
&
oevering the pericad
Oo tober THI up ta May feoh in the aggregate sum of
PT,951,751.68 : Petitiones therein that the
collection unde fer t4% (bb) of the Tax Code of the
ax OH ales of stemmed leaf tobacen
¢
ram
WAS erponeakS Aids ay fide sale are
=
a | because Suen
>. etipt Prod
op Se Lax when nade ty a tebacce
manuractkui er Wigorecily ao ahathed if aocardanee with
Section tery of the Tax Cede.
a
te subject stemmed leaf tobacce tea
exulsea vax; thel the payment of speeifie tax on stemmed
Sou AMGun tS .o duoubie taxation because exoise
tau: iS aga@in peril oan tne Pinished cigarette products;
path 144 ae? the Tax Code $3 & general provision
3 Weans “Aubiiai Payment” of Bureau of
1
1
DEC ES TON
aA oor oa
Hot @bpply Lo stemmed leaf tobacea,
¥ wWanufactured tobacco, ft|ike stemmed
at, iG fe einpe From specif ie tan under Revenue
a
réeygudations We. FY 87a; that
be)
a
am
ro
8
us
wu
a
ol
G
or
5
oe
ce
Pad
Suppor ks pis i
hebagwe Aw ity Lhe natee oof Hp. Lorenzo S&S. Barredo, then
Shief oof the Pnspeotion Service of respondent’ s
alated th his book enbtptbed
, PRibtppine Tobacece
fue oat Arhicles Subject
3" that sate of Stemmed teaf tLobacee in bulk Frem one
matufactur ei Lo anmebher $8 exempt from tax, Hence, can he
withelrawn From tne pidsce of production or customs custody
{fh
eit tn tae, that even if itt
uP fyihally pia@bie, Gt CAN ft Ponger be held -Liablte for
Lhe payment of ex
af Che tolaece
re
are
r
Lhe trarnktifacturcei ur prottucer before
Pemoaws
oe
-
i,
gy
~
i,
pace
c
o
pole
if
~~
pom fhe place of production, it
aflegedtly Was ia forger the owner hor the existi
DOS OP bie Same; aga Paéetiy, that eyen assuming
Was carrect, the
WAS Mepeihe rroneous.
e
Pati iionesr Aver Ss ,however, that up to the Filing of
rt been able to aet
be phatdant PeLitioar, Pespandent ha
pie cent Abpea, ley is
fox
Slop the purring af the peremplory period uf two-years
4
a
witha whdody has Pile a judied=sl Soya din Foy roa fara as
of the Tae Code, as amended.
its etanee @ que. On
cr
his Answer he
Ts
ot
Pa
Mog
cys
Lubaced fs
stemmed Jeaf
prep
f
bs
mi &
oP of the NIRC, as
“wiuita) ay Reve
t
he
aad
a3,
Daa F
PRP CET
may
aw waters without
tax only | the sate
mittee directly ts
poner oF
Cigar &
Ce SB107,
fnternal
Tabacos,
1996)
section
applies only te local sates ef
(fomiss
Deoenbet
A
ti
Pur therars
Peba@eco and aot La imoortbatians
Phyo sing
tems)
COHLEG |
es re ee |
the
henna
ane <
4
{4
ree £6
ri }owed
‘Pe
and
ted
Pod |
it
(ad
f aw
G4
manufacture
an
L
of which
{
tb, This
of tower
slemmec
Waterial
garette.
1
t
a Sterte
ap. No,
ar te,
3
r iz
without
OMeais,
1
“+
AW , said
pd
iy
ght that
. «£88,
-einmecd beat
abroad.
wAPOing.
Lilener, as
aaindy fbiwe
seal offer
it respective
THES jesuc canfronting Us is whether or
2
petit dponear is tegally ahu faetualty entitled to ites c
why
- = a vy
peape » gunmen batbion ud rhs partige, the
proavydigione of laws !
=
%
ae
the mathei. Some of the pertinent e@escerpts of CA-G.R.,
Mod. $6279 had a S oehri pb bead Lowmmiecscioner of later
ievewus vg. For ilies Tobacce
Jahan y SO, 998, wh pan ps amp licgabily si in fa
i and Che dice isib bones faeised by the par
hepein, flog bereby j eu if answeil ie)
paoteaticdis ius Paieed by berein parties, thus:
trade.
piavided if
caxation
material
es oh the
must be
law. it
-ufe@-making
ger the fast
waa dt oe
GARTOL
body.
peal ay
at Appeals has already snooker
alian, proamutigated
as
ct
bain
the
x
ay
=
ba)
DECISION
moe i” aie GO. b.A, OO, Wo wld y and tipe p pak di oF 7 Cigapretia mA Sponer atic ssued mh Ley ply ance,” Phiowe & { eset fons is Haat giv Fudd is Wee it EO. eot to basic enuneiated We i Spans.
en the a ayed , mia FP “oP this Court to pe 7 re boo? Appeats, ih og mi al Lhe imesocapahl t fips Made is prec)” 7 rt c L yep Pope aim a cl machine 2 rod 3 3 a eee!
4, fe c Zz HO, GAGE Valbidatiun oF payiiotites CE eh bopis \ to THe) SOHYENOSS WAL Proven Lhe ealinpe amount of its WHERE bi yb ee uF Lie Pepegoildg, the iietant Padtibion Pas Hey pee pe sepeby GRANTED. Reoordin Aas rPecdpanden? te hereby ORDERED te KEFUND bie anOuUTET oF PORE, Pru. Ou aaa) has pebi tial ap immetwiately. No
SO ORDERED.
WCPO QO.
siate/udge eeurlify that this decision Was reached members of the Caurto oof Tas Appeatese ft Aceordanece wilh 2