Skip to decision

Court of Tax Appeals

0

LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE FACTORY, et al. vs. with principal office at ham, et al.

CTA Case No. 5466 September 23, 1998


REPUBLIC GF THE PHILTPPINES

COURT GF TAX APPEALS


QUEZON CITy


LA SUERTE CIGAR AND CIGARETTE

FACTORY, (I[Ne.,

Petitioner,


C.TLA. CASE HO. S466


COMMISSIONER Of INTERNAL ALYVERNUE , Pramulgated:


—s


Spend fie

atieyediy fave been e@rpoeneousty paid by the petitioner on

iia bulk purchases of stemined-ieaf tobaccea from foreign

Popa aintubachur sta.


seppor ation cduly organized and

ex doting oeler Fall ipp ine favs with principal office at


ham, i, Weal Serpe boe Road, Faranague, Metro Manila. ih


iS ehyag ae pfs importation ane Peual purchase af

Si epined leaf towacue which it Uses AS & raw material tn


the precuetion and tanufacture ef eigar and cigarettes.


ort

P


ma,


ve

1

r


hmpte.


peed Phe month ee Marah Pear petitioner ailegedty


bedaw fished amounts of


Spe ibio tavres oi petlitioner ss bulk purchases of stemmed


reas


beat toebaoan Pram fopeign tobaceea manufacturers, as


95 2044548 15

GS 2044545 QO0

95 2O4abag 7S

ig


oft


ig


AO


wo


Op ~) Ow


co


a

Wo


it


oe


Ab


=

‘


foaee and Oetober 2, 1996,


petitioned Fliedowpatben claims for pefuncd and an amended


rs

ae”

.

~

—~

‘

oe

=

&


oevering the pericad


Oo tober THI up ta May feoh in the aggregate sum of


PT,951,751.68 : Petitiones therein that the


collection unde fer t4% (bb) of the Tax Code of the


ax OH ales of stemmed leaf tobacen


¢

ram


WAS erponeakS Aids ay fide sale are


=


a | because Suen


>. etipt Prod


op Se Lax when nade ty a tebacce

manuractkui er Wigorecily ao ahathed if aocardanee with


Section tery of the Tax Cede.


a


te subject stemmed leaf tobacce tea


exulsea vax; thel the payment of speeifie tax on stemmed


Sou AMGun tS .o duoubie taxation because exoise

tau: iS aga@in peril oan tne Pinished cigarette products;


path 144 ae? the Tax Code $3 & general provision


3 Weans “Aubiiai Payment” of Bureau of

1

1


DEC ES TON


aA oor oa


Hot @bpply Lo stemmed leaf tobacea,


¥ wWanufactured tobacco, ft|ike stemmed


at, iG fe einpe From specif ie tan under Revenue


a


réeygudations We. FY 87a; that


be)

a

am

ro

8

us

wu

a

ol

G

or

5


oe

ce

Pad


Suppor ks pis i


hebagwe Aw ity Lhe natee oof Hp. Lorenzo S&S. Barredo, then


Shief oof the Pnspeotion Service of respondent’ s


alated th his book enbtptbed


, PRibtppine Tobacece


fue oat Arhicles Subject


3" that sate of Stemmed teaf tLobacee in bulk Frem one


matufactur ei Lo anmebher $8 exempt from tax, Hence, can he


withelrawn From tne pidsce of production or customs custody


{fh


eit tn tae, that even if itt


uP fyihally pia@bie, Gt CAN ft Ponger be held -Liablte for


Lhe payment of ex


af Che tolaece


re

are

r


Lhe trarnktifacturcei ur prottucer before


Pemoaws


oe

-

i,

gy


~

i,

pace

c

o

pole

if

~~


pom fhe place of production, it


aflegedtly Was ia forger the owner hor the existi


DOS OP bie Same; aga Paéetiy, that eyen assuming


Was carrect, the


WAS Mepeihe rroneous.


e


Pati iionesr Aver Ss ,however, that up to the Filing of


rt been able to aet


be phatdant PeLitioar, Pespandent ha


pie cent Abpea, ley is


fox


Slop the purring af the peremplory period uf two-years


4


a


witha whdody has Pile a judied=sl Soya din Foy roa fara as


of the Tae Code, as amended.


its etanee @ que. On


cr


his Answer he


Ts


ot


Pa

Mog


cys

Lubaced fs


stemmed Jeaf

prep


f

bs


mi &


oP of the NIRC, as

“wiuita) ay Reve

t


he

aad

a3,


Daa F

PRP CET


may

aw waters without

tax only | the sate

mittee directly ts

poner oF

Cigar &

Ce SB107,

fnternal

Tabacos,

1996)

section

applies only te local sates ef


(fomiss


Deoenbet

A


ti


Pur therars


Peba@eco and aot La imoortbatians


Phyo sing

tems)


COHLEG |


es re ee |


the

henna


ane <


4


{4


ree £6

ri }owed


‘Pe


and


ted


Pod |


it


(ad


f aw


G4


manufacture


an


L


of which


{


tb, This

of tower


slemmec


Waterial


garette.


1

t


a Sterte


ap. No,


ar te,

3

r iz

without


OMeais,


1

“+


AW , said


pd


iy


ght that


. «£88,


-einmecd beat


abroad.


wAPOing.


Lilener, as


aaindy fbiwe

seal offer


it respective


THES jesuc canfronting Us is whether or


2


petit dponear is tegally ahu faetualty entitled to ites c


why


- = a vy

peape » gunmen batbion ud rhs partige, the


proavydigione of laws !


=

%

ae


the mathei. Some of the pertinent e@escerpts of CA-G.R.,


Mod. $6279 had a S oehri pb bead Lowmmiecscioner of later


ievewus vg. For ilies Tobacce


Jahan y SO, 998, wh pan ps amp licgabily si in fa

i and Che dice isib bones faeised by the par

hepein, flog bereby j eu if answeil ie)

paoteaticdis ius Paieed by berein parties, thus:


trade.

piavided if

caxation


material

es oh the


must be


law. it

-ufe@-making

ger the fast


waa dt oe


GARTOL

body.


peal ay


at Appeals has already snooker


alian, proamutigated


as

ct


bain


the


x


ay


=

ba)


DECISION

moe i” aie GO. b.A, OO, Wo wld y and tipe p pak di oF 7 Cigapretia mA Sponer atic ssued mh Ley ply ance,” Phiowe & { eset fons is Haat giv Fudd is Wee it EO. eot to basic enuneiated We i Spans.

en the a ayed , mia FP “oP this Court to pe 7 re boo? Appeats, ih og mi al Lhe imesocapahl t fips Made is prec)” 7 rt c L yep Pope aim a cl machine 2 rod 3 3 a eee!

4, fe c Zz HO, GAGE Valbidatiun oF payiiotites CE eh bopis \ to THe) SOHYENOSS WAL Proven Lhe ealinpe amount of its WHERE bi yb ee uF Lie Pepegoildg, the iietant Padtibion Pas Hey pee pe sepeby GRANTED. Reoordin Aas rPecdpanden? te hereby ORDERED te KEFUND bie anOuUTET oF PORE, Pru. Ou aaa) has pebi tial ap immetwiately. No

SO ORDERED.

WCPO QO.

siate/udge eeurlify that this decision Was reached members of the Caurto oof Tas Appeatese ft Aceordanece wilh 2

Contents