Court of Tax Appeals
0VAN ~ELLE <Phi1s. >, INC vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Republic of the Philippines
COURT OF TAX APPEALS
Quezon City
VAN
~ELLE <Phi1s. >,
INC.,
Petitioner,
-
versus -
C.T.A. CASE NO. 4783
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent.
Promu1gated:
FEB 0 8 1995
X ----------------------------------------
D
E
C
I
S
I
0
N
This
case
involves
a
claim
for
refund
of
overpaid
income
tax
for
the
calendar
year
ending
December 31, 1989 in the amount of Pl,017,465.00.
Petitioner
is
a
domestic
corporation,
engaged
in
the
business
as
a
confectioner.
On
April
7,
1990, petitioner filed its annual income tax return
for
the
year ended December 31, 1989 which shows a
taxable
income
of
P3,167,666.00
and
an
income
tax
due
of
P1, 108,683.00.
In
its
'quarterly
income
tax
return
for
the
first quarter, petitioner
paid its income tax liability
in
the
amount of P2,126,148.00 which
is
computed
as
follows:
D E C I S I 0 N -
C.T.A. Case No. 4783
Quarter
1st
2nd
817570203
817395984
-
2 -
05-31-89
08-31-89
3rd
817493960
11-29-89
TOTAL INCOHE TAX PAID FOR 1989
A:HOUHT
655,711.00
678,423.00
792,014.00
p 2,.126,.148.00
=============
Petitioner averred that it overpaid its income tax
liability
for
the
year
1989
in
the
amount
of
P1,017,465.00, instead of its actual liability which
is
P1,108,683.00.
On
April
7, 1991,
petitioner filed its annual
income
tax
return
for
its
calendar
year
ended
December 31, 1990 showing a net loss of P5,352,455.00.
Petitioner alleged that
since he was not able
to
utilize its excess tax payments made in 1989 during
the
taxable year 1990 and 1991, it is entitled to the refund
pursuant
to Section 69, in relation to Section
230
of
the National Internal Revenue Code.
On
March 22, 1991, petitioner filed its written
claim for refund of overpaid income tax for 1989 in
the
amount of P1,017,465.00.
To
this date, respondent
has not yet acted
upon
petitioner's claim for refund.
Hence, this petition for
review
inorder
to toll the running of
the
two
year
prescriptive period prescribed in Section 230 of the Tax
Code.
238
D E C I S I 0 N -
C.T.A. Case No. 4783
-
3
-
Upon these facts, respondent raised as special and
affirmative
defenses
lack
of cause
of
action
under
Section 204 of the Tax Code, wherein the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue may refund or credit taxes
erroneously
or
illegally received.
Furthermore, respondent
assert
that
petitioner failed
to
establish that
the
tax
liability in the amount of P1,017,465.00 was erroneously
and
illegally collected.
Tax
refund
are
construed
strictly against the taxpayer as they are in the
nature
of tax exemption.
The sole issue raised in this petition is
whether
or not petitioner is entitled to the refund of
overpaid
income tax for the year 1989.
Petitioner
presented the following
documents
in
support of its claim:
( 1 )
<2>
(3)
Exhs.
"A" and "E" -
1989
and
1990
Annual Income Tax Returns.
Exhs.
"B", "B-1", "C",
"C-1",
"D"
and
"D-1"
Payments
orders
and
Confirmation Receipts for the first
three quarters of 1989.
Exh.
"I" -
Claim for
refund
March
21, 1991, filed with the
on March 22, 1991.
dated
BIR
Clearly, petitioner proved its proper
entitlement
to its claim for refund.
239
D E C I S I 0 N -
C.T.A. Case No. 4783
-
4 -
Records
reveal
that, in
a
resolution
dated October 27, 1992, respondent was declared in de£ault £or £ailure to file his answer within 30 days, £rom April 30, 1992 to May 30, 1992.
It was only on September 22, 1992, or a period of more than three months, when respondent filed hj~ answer. Again, in an Order dated August 9, 1993, respondent £ailed to £ile her comment on petitioner's £ormal o££er of evidence within the time given by the Court.
On the hearing held on October 20, 1993, respondent £ailed to appear prompting petitioner to ask the Court to declare respondent's absence as a waiver on her part to present evidence. It can be seen that there was no clear attempt on the part o£ respondent to contest and challenge th& veracity o£ petitioner's evidence and neither did the £ormer submit her own evidence. In summary, respondent slept on her rights in de£ending this case to the prejudice o£ the interest o£ the government o£ which she is primarily bound to protect, while petitioner showed to the full satis£action of the Court its clear entitlement to the relie£ sought for. Petitioners 1989 Corporate Income Tax £iled on April 7, 1990 Office No.
31, 1 2 3 D E C I S I 0 N -
- 5 - clearly shows its refundable amount and marked as Exhibit "A" with the following computations: Gross inco1e:
Fro• operations ISch.ll Loss fro• sales or exchange of property other than capital assets 1Sch.2l Other sources Total gross inco1e Less: deductions Net inco1e A1ount of tax due Deduct: quarterly tax pay~ents Qtr.
O.R. lo.
Date Aaount 1st 817570203 05-31-89 1 , 655, 711.002 2nd 817395984 08-31-89 678,423.003 3rd 817493960 11-29-89 792,014.00 Total a10unt of tax refundable , 45,058,366.00 21,500.00) 2,162,585.00 , 47,199,451.00 4410311785.00 p 3,167,66&.00 ================ , 1,108,683.00 2.126,148.00 , 1,017,465.00 =============:::
Respondent may be considered as not questioning seriously petitioner's entitlement to its claim for refund.
Moreso, when the evidence presented were not disputed by respondent, sufficiently established petitioner's right to the refund <Sanitary Wares Nfg.
vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 4150, August 21, 1992, Sun Life Insura11ce Office Ltd. vs. The Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No.
3205, June 23, 1989.
Exh. '8'.
Ex h. •c•.
241 '' 'I':'!• D E C I S I 0 N -
-· 6 -
WHEREFORE, in view o£ the £oregoing circumstances, respondent is hereby ordered to REFUND or issue tax credit in £avor o£ the petitioner the amount o£ P1,017,465.00 representing its overpaid income tax for the year 1989.
SO ORDERED.
GRUBA Associate Judge
WE CONCUR:
~~\9..~ ERN TO D. ACOSTA RA~,O~~~ Associate ~lu~W CERTIFICATION I hereby certi£y that this decision was reached a£ter due consultation among the members o£ the Court o£ Tax Appeals in accordance with Section 13, Article VIII, o£ the Constitution. 242 ~(2-~ ERHESTO D. ACOSTA Presiding ~Tudge Court o£ Tax Appeals