Skip to decision

Court of Tax Appeals

0

CTA Case No. 3890

CTA Case No. 3890 December 15, 1989


REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

COURT OF TAX APPEALS

QUEZON CITY

POLYGRAM CORPORATION,

Petitioner-~

-- ver-sus -

C.T.A. Case No. 3890

THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE~

Respondent.

>~

----

--.. ---->(

D

E

C

I

s

A

simple

claim

for-

I

D

N

r-efund/tax

cr-edit

of

alleged over-paid withholding tax on film

r·entals

based on the "most- favor-ed nation" c laL1se of the

Republic

of

the

Philippines-United

States

Tax

Tr-eaty.

Petitioner-~ a non-r-esident for-eign cor-poration

or-ganized and existing under-

the laws of the State

of

Delawar-e~ U.S.A., is engaged in the business of

film distr-ibution and

had

license contr-acts with

local television stations and adver-tising agencies,

mor-e par-ticular-ly,

the Gr-eater-

Manila Ar-ea Radio

and Te 1 ev is ion Ar·ts ( GMA)

and At 1 as Pr-omotion and

Mar-keting

Cor-por-ations~

which

on

var-ious

dates

withheld

and

paid

t.a:-:es

on

film

r-entals

or-

r-oyalties payable to petitioner- at the r-ate of 25%

513


DECISION

- 2 - pursuant to Section 24(b)(1) (IV) of the Revenue Code of 1977J detailed as follows: Internal Gross Ta>: at Receipts/ 25/.

Royalties A.

~

(1) Take Ya..1r ls$ 3125 US$ 781.25 Pest Shot 3125 781.25 (2) Isabel's Choice 62::'<1 1562.~) B.

AlLAS ( 1) Elephant Parts 1::'(.'Xl 375 1::'(X) 375 (2) Gnones 10(1() 250 (3) Magic FlL1te 1000 250 {4) Bert Kaempfert 1::'(.10 375 (5) 1-btline 2000 ::'(."X) __ :f(X)Q_ -·---=~"9 __ c.

T 0 T A L

~~~;~-~.~ ~.~.!l~~£~ Date Paid 2- 1-83 3-31-B3

5- 3- B3

1-21-8.3 5- 3- 83

5- 3-B3

4- 6- 84 The payment of the rate of 25/. withholding tax l nonetheless~ petitioner took exception by asserting that the rate of only 10/. tax applies on royalties and rentals pursuant to the "most-favored nation" clause in Article 13 of the RP-US Tax Treaty taken in conjunction with Article VIII of the Kingdom of Sweden-Republic of the Phi 1 i ppines Ta:< Convention and Article IX of the Denmark - RF' Tax Convention. Under the provisions of the RP-US Ta >:

Convention~ royalti es or rentals derived by a resident of the United States for the use of~ or· the right to use cinematographic films, or tapes 51 3

- 3 - used for radio or television broadcasting are subject to the lowest rate of Philippine tax imposed on similar type of income derived by a resident of a third State. The lowest rate of tax that may be imposed by the Phi 1 ippines on such royal ties is foLmd in the ta>: conventions of the . .

Philippines with Denmark and the Kingdom of Sweden. 1r 0 Article VIII of the Kingdom of Sweden-Republic of the Philippines Tax Convention provides: " ( 1) Income which a resident or corporation of Sweden derives from \ rentals or other amounts paid by a Y esident or corporation of the Philippines as consideration for the use, or the right to use motion picture films, films or ta ~es for radio or television broadcastin , may be taxed in the Philippines at ten percent (lOX) of such rentals or amount paid." Article IX of the Denmark-Republic of the Philippines Tax Convention likewise provides: " ( 1) Income which a resident or corporation of Denmark derives from rentals or other amounts paid by a resident or corporation of the Philippines as consideration for the use of, or the right to use, motion picture films, films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting, may be taxed in the Phi 1 ippines at ten percent (lOX) of the gross rentals or amounts paid." Accordingly, since the royalties derived by petitioner from its contracts with local licensees for the LISe of motion picture films or- f i 1 ms or tapes for radio and television broadcasting are of 520 ) r ' > .

- 4 - the same kind as fil m renta l s under the tax conventions of the Philippines with Denmark and the Kingdom of Sweden, they are subject to a ten percent (10% ) tax pursuant to Article 13 , paragraph 2(b) (iii) of the RP- US Tax Convention. ~ hus applied, the ten percent (10%) rate vis-a-vi s the twenty five percent (25%) earlier -l computed, shows an el·:cess payment of P36, 444.84 '-----" ~~ i Z II :

B.

( 1) Take Yo...tr Best Ta:-: at lOX Shot $312. 50 312.50 (2 ) Isabel's Choi ce 312. ~) 312. ~) .

BJlA?.

(1) Elephant parts $1!50

(2) GnO'T'!eS 1~) (2 ) GnO'T'!eS 100 (3 ) Magic Flute 100 ( 4) Bert Kaempfert 150 ( 5) 1-btline 2tX> 200 TOTPL Over- Refundable or Payment Creditable in Pesos $468.75 468.75 468.75 468.75 $225 225 1~) 1~) 225 ::::~x> 300 p 4,3:56.09 4,3:56.CR 4,6~). (X) ___ ... :~ts_Q~-!-~.~~1 P18,012.18 p 2 ,090.92 3 !1723. 37 1,393.95 1,489.35 2,234.02 4 ' 2()0 • 61.)

_,_:;;l,_~~~.!.1~ l~n January 21, 1984 petitioner filed a claim for the refund or tax credit of the overpaid amount of withholding tax on film rentals or royalties but which remains unacted to date by the respondent. 521

- 5 - Hence this petition.

Be that as it may~ it needs neither argument nor citation of authorities to establish the validity of the claimed refund or tax credit as the law is clear and the language used amply sufficient to dispel any pall cif uncertainty over the same. Moreover~ respondent's ruling so provides that "This Office hereby confirms that the royalties derived by Polygram Corporation (petitioner) for the LISe of motion pictLtre films or films or tapes for radio or television broadcasting are subject to 10'Y. withholding tax pursuant to Section 13(2) (iii) of the RP-US Tax Treaty."

(BJR Ruling No. 065-85~ We do not think any different conclusion ought to be reached • Certainly the law requires no more and e>:pects no less.

Petitioner has fared consistent with the relevant legal standards in proving entitlement to a favorable determination of the desired relief.

WHEREFORE, respondent is hereby ordered to refund or grant a tax credit in favor of the petitioner for the amount sought. No costs.

SO ORDERED.

Quezon City, Metro Manila, December 15, 1989. !}:;&, REYE Associate Judge 522

- 6 -

WE CONCUR:

Judge CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this decision was reached after due consultation among the members of the Court of Tax Appeals in accordance with Section 13 , Article VIII of the Constitution. Presidin Judge Court of Ta x Appeals 52J

Contents