I ' '·, et al. vs. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue

DECISION -

2 When the application for remittance was actually filed with the Central Bank, the same was not approved V due to certain technicalities and so the accumulated branch profits of petitioner for the years 1977 to 1980 totalling 81,399,105.00 was not actually remitted / abroad.

In a ruling dated January 21, 1980, respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue ruled that "the 15% branch profit remittance tax shall be imposed on the profit actually remitted and not on the total branch profit out of which the remittance is to be made". This ruling is plainly in accordance with Section 24(b)(2) of the Tax Code which provide in part thus- "xxx Provided, further, that any profit remitted abtoad by a branch office to its mother company shall be subject to tax of fifteen percent (except those registered with the Export Processing Zone Authority) xxx." LEmphasis supplie~/.

On August 18, 1983, petitioner filed with respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue, a claim ~ for refund of the total amount of 8209,866.00 repre- senting its erroneous payment of branch profit remit- tance tax, pursuant to Section 295 of the Tax Code 131

3 which up to the present respondent has hot acted upon (Exh. E).

Hence, this appeal.

The sole issue in this case is whether or not petitioner is entitled to the refund of the sum of 8209,866.00 as erroneous payment of branch profit remittance tax, Considering the fact that aforementioned branch profits of petitioner for the years 1970 to 1980 were ~not actually remitted abroad, pursuant to the pro- visions of Section 24(b)(2) of the Tax Code and ruling of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue dated January 21, 1980, it is not liable for the 15% branch profit remittance tax, and hence petitioner is entitled to the refund of the full amount of 8209,866.00 which it remit~ ted to the Bureau of Internal Revenue on February 18, 1982.

WHEREFORE, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is hereby ordered to refund to petitioner American ~Express International Inc., the sum of 8209,866.00 representing 15% branch profit tax imposed under Section 24(b)(2) of the Tax Code.

13 2 -

DECISION -

CTA CASE NO . 3736 4 No pronouncement as to costs .

WE CONCUR:

AMANTE F

Presidin

~.

REYE

'~Jte Judge C. ROAQUIN

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that this decision was reached after due consultation among the members of the Court of Tax Appeals in accordance with Section 13 , Article VIII of the Constitution .

~~~

AMANTE F

Presidin

133