Court of Tax Appeals
06'\Epu"Ftlic ~P' the Philippinei Court of Tax Appeli Quezon CLT1' I - Visayan Transportation Company, Incorporated vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
6'\EPU"ftLIC ~P' THE PHILIPPINEI
COURT OF TAX APPE•LI
QUEZON ClT1'
I
-
VISAYAN TRANSPORTATION
COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
Petitioner,
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE,
Respondent.
X -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
C.T.A. CASE NO. 2055
•D .E C I S I 0 N
This is a petition seeking refund of compensating
tax in the amount of P1 ,101.00 paid by petitioner on the
importation of two (2) pieces of Airflex Clutch Glands No.
3327445, Model:
6-278- ·, pursuant to Section 190(d) of
the National Internal Revenue Code.
Petitioner is a corporation duly organized and
existing under the laws of the Philippines, with
office address at No. 1 P. Zamora St., Cebu City,
engaged in the business of transporting passengers
and cargo by sea.
On October 23, 1967, petitioner purchased
from J. L. Direclex, San Francisco, California, u.s ••
two (2) pieces of Airflex Clutch Glands No. 3327445,
Model:
6-278-A.
On November 21, 1967, before the
articles arrived in the Philippines, petitioner,
through its manager, Josefa D. Lim, wrote a notarized
letter to the Regional Director of the Bureau of
Internal Revenue in Cebu City, requesting exemption
'
DECISION -
2 from the payment of compensating tax on said articles alleging that the same would be used as replacement for old and worn- out clutch of M/V 11Governor Smith 11 which is owned and operated by it in its shipping business.
In fact, the articles were later used as such replacement.
On November 25, ~967 , the articles arrived in the Philippines on board the M/V "Philippine Corregidort•, Voy. No. 20-W. On December 1, 1967, the respondent, through the Col- lector of Customs of Cebu City, assessed and col- lected P1 , 101 . 00 as compensating tax. On May 12, 1969, petitioner filed a claim for refund of the aforesaid amount under Section 190(d) of the Revenue C6de .
On November 25, 1969, no action having been taken by respondent on the claim, petitioner inter- posed the present appeal becp.use the 2-year period for the recovery of tax erroneously or ~llegally collected was soon to expire.
The foregoing facts are borne out by the evidence .
As a matter of fact, the record shows that after the filing of this case , the BIR Regional Office in Cebu investigated the claim in question and on July 14, 1970, Examiner Milagros Abrea recom- ' mended its approval.
And while petitioner presented evidence in support of its claim during the hearing of this case respondent did not present any. In
3 answer to petitioner's memorandum, respondent mere- ly submitted a manifestation that he was leaving this case to the sound discretion of the Court. The claim for refund in question is justified by Section 190(4) of the Revenue Code, the pertinent portion of which reads as follows: SEC. 190.
Compensating tax.-- On the commodities, goods, wares or merchandise purchased or received by persons residing or doing business in the Philippines, there shall be paid a compensating tax on the total value thereof, including freight, postage, insurance, commission and similar charges, equivalent to the ¥ercentage taxes imposed under this itle on original transactions effect- ed by merchants, importers, or manu- facturers, such tax to be paid before the withdrawal or removal of said com- modities, goods, wares or merchandise from the customhouse or the post of- fice, except as follows:
X
X
X
X
X
(d) Articles to be used by the importer himself as passenger and/or cargo vessel whether coastwise or oceangoing, including engines and spare parts of said vessel;
WHEREFORE, respondent is hereby ordered to refund the sum of ~1,101 . 00 to petitioner without pronounce- ment as to costs.
SO ORDERED.
Quezon Citj, September ROMAN M. UMALI ~~Pre~idi~e _ ~tte'«.~~~ ss ocia te Judgec/' 9, 1972.
A-- 1~·
RAMON L. AVANCEf A