Library
Court of Tax Appeals decisions
8,629 decisions · 1954–2026
338 decisions from the 1980s
Newest first
- ~UI?J:, et al. CTA Case No. 3762
- ~Ptj8uc of 'Hi£ ~~Ilippin:R'' ~Ourt of Tax App£al..Q QUAO.K Crrr Planters Products, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 3464
- J U:Ttvauc O ' Ttdiupptnr 00\JRT of Tax 4PP.EALS Q\.1 0 Cj!y Us$531,338 and HK$870 Ong Tor Cheo vs. The Hon. Commissioner of Custot-1s CTA Case No. 3897
- Gtl!Pu&Tuc of, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3383
- «.T.:F'Tjbllc 0 P ''H£ ~T-J1lll"I"IN1''1 ~Ourt of Tax APPE.A.I.JT Q\JJI.'EOJI Cjfy Paper Industries Corporation of the Philippines (PICOP) ~ vs. Ramon J. Farolan CTA Case No. 3372
- T:I'Obllc 0 Vlt£ _, et al. vs. -· vs. ·- Comj'1issioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3531
Advertisements
- P.. Oct'J>L}8uc of >He ~~LL.!F>T'Ln '" ~Ourt of T.X A.PPF~\L! Qljbom Cj ~·W Kapatiran Realty Corporation vs. ·~ Commissio Ne R of Inlernal Rev En Ue, X - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X CTA Case No. 3443
- Fh!Ptjbllc 0 II" H·L€ ~T-Iiui"Pit~P~ ~Ourt of Tax I\.PP£AL.S Qu~Oi~ Cj!y Western Pa Lawan Timber Corporation vs. The Commissioner of in Ternal Revenue CTA Case No. 3544
- J. I I L I I L T Li, et al. vs. The Comm I Ssioner of Customs CTA Case No. 2845
- ~-... ~ "·~--....... C.LI!LH.UU.U! Op Hie T"Liili!"F&N,-'F Rou T of Tax..\PP£Als Qu$:0!1 Clt'V Cotabato Light & Power Co., Inc vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respond Ent. X - - - - - - - - - - - X D E C I S I 0 N as Manifested by vs. Cotabato Light & Power Co., Inc., et al. CTA Case No. 3475
- l't!-~tmuc Ol? "Hfl! ~·t IUP'Pt:·n·~· t..:OURT OF TAX. AF'f'i:.:AL~ Q;l.l~.o~ CH'Y Zt'\MBOANGP, vJOOD PHODUCT S, INC vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Hespondento XM<>-~-~ -u~~·· --- ·--.... _....... -.,., - ·- ---.. --~---"'"X D E C I S I 0 N This is a claim for partial TAX refund in the sum of 8832,900~10 as specific tnx paid on oil productr used i n mining operations pursuant to th e provj s ions of Sect i on 5 of Republic Act No. 1435. During the period from July 1, 1980 to l·~ny 51, 1'J82 vs. purchased from Mobil Oil Philippines ln c. ref i ned a nd manufactured mineral oils, et al. CTA Case No. 3522
- U.t:l'tJIH.. tl: O'f, et al. CTA Case No. 3365
- Qt!!Fuslu: Op ';'U£ T'I-L LL!Pf'In1-'9 Coukt of Tax Appeal..Q Q 11:.'2.0!«, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2737
- Futi'Jblic 0 F ""He Tjihlippt, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3442
- ~J!Poblic of, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3511
- Ct£L'Oblic of 'N·Te ~Hlupf'Inf.''L \:Ourt of TAX.A.. Ppi::Aj-'1 QTJ.E.'ZON Cl ~J Zapata Marine Service Ltd., S.A vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3384
- t ' fUU"'OBUC OP llt£.-J.HU f'IN, et al. CTA Case No. 2858
- Q.L'UDUC Op 'Hie F'Hl'U'F'Pint'T \'!Ourt of Tax Arpf..:Al-~ Q.L1E'ZON Cl!? Cantilan LUMBER.COMPANY, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2879
- Ujf'T.Muc Ow 'Rbe ~ ~Iuf'Pi. N·R, et al. vs. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al. CTA Case No. 3746
- "-"Ubllc Op Lh£.-TTILTP.PLL'P'~ C:OU.R.T of Tax.~F'P.Eau Qujeojt an General Milling Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3517
- Q, et al. vs. · Hon. Alfredo Pio De Roda CTA Case No. 2823
- Cci!Jublu~ 0 P ·Rtu, et al. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3215
- Ttmptj!Llic 0 F H-Ie T'J-Hlu-'Pin~'T ~Ourt of Tax ARPEAL.Q Quezon Ci~~"y Trans-Asia, Inc., vs. The Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3729
- L..Hllic 0 F Fh£ LL''F-Huppi~ R ';Ourt of Tax a Pg>Ldql..~ Quf:."Zon Ct<'Yv Mariano P. Pascual and Renato P. Dragon vs. The Com1v1issioner of I Nternal Revenue CTA Case No. 3045
- Ti'.O"'Bul! O!LL UF.L I"Iuupp'H'~I1 ~Ourt of Tax Appf.:...U.S Quron C.I"~~'y GCL Retirement Plan, Repr Esen Ted by Its Tru Ste E-Dir Ector vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 3888