Library

Court of Tax Appeals decisions

8,629 decisions · 1954–2026

1970s Castaneda

126 decisions from the 1970s

Newest first
Newest firstOldest first
1970s Castaneda Clear
  1. Dec 15, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2208 · Division Lawrence, Inc. vs. C.T.A. Cas® No, et al. CTA Case No. 2208
  2. Dec 8, 1975 · CTA Case No. 1773 · Division CTA Case No. 1773 CTA Case No. 1773
  3. Nov 10, 1975 · CTA Case No. 1827 · Division CTA Case No. 1827 CTA Case No. 1827
  4. Oct 14, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2492 · Division I REPURIJC OF THE PHILIPP ~EB CoURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEzpN CI1'Y C ONlAI~T~ HfutU T D'A vs. ACTING CQ111MISSIOI\IEH OF CUSTOHS I'tespondent. X - - - - - - - - - X D E C I S I 0 N This is· an appeal from the decision of the re- spondent dated December 29, et al. CTA Case No. 2492
  5. Oct 10, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2345 · Division Republig of the Philippines. Court of Tax Appeals Quezon> City | Tkopical | >Isurtbutors, Inc. vs. = C.%Eae Case No. 2345 Dis Cobiiscligsan of Ints Anal Lusvnue, et al. CTA Case No. 2345
  6. Oct 9, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2095 · Division I Repuhf, et al. vs. The Cmfrhssioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2095
  1. Oct 1, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2454 · Division Cantilan Lumber Company vs. = the Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2454
  2. Sep 22, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2494 · Division A the Philippine American Management Company, Inc. vs. ~ the Commissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2494
  3. Aug 12, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2377 · Division Planters Products Agricul~ Tural Cooprrative Marketing & Supply, et al. vs. Ceteae Case Ro, et al. CTA Case No. 2377
  4. Jun 3, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2388 · Division Re?FRT.TC of the Phillppl~Es Court of Tax APPEA.LS Quezon Cn'Y Teodoro Vanoj- Substituted by Milagros H. Vafio vs. Hon. Misael P. Vera, et al. CTA Case No. 2388
  5. May 15, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2386 · Division Private Jpep Braring Piats Ho, et al. vs. Casf No, et al. CTA Case No. 2386
  6. May 12, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2500 · Division Peti « vs. « Celehe CASE NO, et al. CTA Case No. 2500
  7. Mar 31, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2564 · Division Caltea Inc., et al. vs. ~ Acting Conmissioner of Customs, et al. CTA Case No. 2564
  8. Feb 24, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2478 · Division ' C O~· Llf. 'Phllipp~ ~F8 ~R Tax Appjr'I\L~ Ou!:.T 1!\ C. L y Carlos Sun, et al. vs. Acting Cot<Inissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 2478
  9. Feb 19, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2354 · Division Fh::-T"\1 C of the Philippl~I·.8 < Ol Rt of Tax Appeals Quezon Clty Institutional Food Services, Inc vs. C. T. L.O Case No. 2354 Tile Cohhission~R of Internal Revenue, · CTA Case No. 2354
  10. Feb 12, 1975 · CTA Case No. 2371 · Division Concepcion Calalang vs. Rolaiido G. Geotina, et al. CTA Case No. 2371
  11. Dec 23, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2367 · Division RR.·Pl· 1H.TC 07 Th, et al. vs. The City Assessor of the City of Naniia and the Board of Assess~Mnt Appeals of the City of Wuriia, et al. CTA Case No. 2367
  12. Dec 18, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2553 · Division Linda- Mar Corporation vs. Gomi1i:Ssioner of Cu3toms1 CTA Case No. 2553
  13. Nov 20, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2081 · Division ' 'L Tcfof Thl. Philipp:-.IE8 L. "Llt' U F T A..:\. a P, L8 Q·.Ezon Tabacal'Era I Nsurance Co., Inc vs. Commi Ssioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2081
  14. Nov 12, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2088 · Division J Hr:PH~I.IC 1 0f Tu~ PIYTLTPP.I:--1e8 F ',. Wr Uf Tax Af'.P.LI: · Ls Qu!.'.Zu:\ Cll '/ ' Everett Steamship Corporation, et al. vs. The Co:T:Vlmissioner of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2088
  15. Nov 11, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2246 · Division Hf.:F'L''LI.IC1 of Tfff. ?Btu'F"Pi~F::S C" T, et al. vs. CO.TVLHISSIONER of Internal Revenue CTA Case No. 2246
  16. Sep 24, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2237 · Division Rural Bank of L1alasiqui, I Nc vs. Coj:·:Iiviissioner of I Ni'Ernal Revel'L'Ue CTA Case No. 2237
  17. Sep 24, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2250 · Division P..:>\', et al. vs. Comlviissioner of INTERNAL.REVENUE CTA Case No. 2250
  18. Sep 17, 1974 · CTA Case No. 2082 · Division He!'T·L:, et al. vs. Commissioner of Customs CTA Case No. 2082
  19. Sep 3, 1974 · CTA Case No. 448 · Division f ·.··. ~l.T:, et al. CTA Case No. 448