Information
Term
6th June 1945 - 17th August 1949
Voting Summary
Voting Record (17)
Sunripe Coconut Product Co. vs. Court of Industrial Relations
30th April 1949
Bustos vs. Lucero
20th October 1948
Justice Perfecto also dissented, maintaining his position from the Dequito case that Section 11 of Rule 108 must be interpreted to preserve confrontation rights
Sayo vs. Chief of Police of Manila
12th May 1948
Vargas vs. Rilloraza
26th February 1948
People vs. Prieto
29th January 1948
Primicias vs. Fugoso
27th January 1948
Krivenko vs. Register of Deeds of Manila
15th November 1947
People vs. Agpangan
10th October 1947
People vs. Adriano
30th June 1947
Caraos vs. Daza
13th March 1947
Mabanag vs. Lopez Vito
5th March 1947
Laurel vs. Misa
30th January 1947
Ruffy vs. Chief of Staff
20th August 1946
Justice Perfecto issued a dissenting opinion, arguing:
1. The silence of the Articles of War regarding Supreme Court review should not be interpreted as denying such power
2. Courts-martial should be considered part of the judicial system, not the executive branch
3. The Supreme Court has the power to review decisions of military tribunals
4. The petition should be granted to allow the Supreme Court to review the court-martial's jurisdiction
People vs. Cruz
21st February 1946
Yamashita vs. Styer
19th December 1945
Peralta vs. Director of Prisons
12th November 1945
Co Kim Cham vs. Valdez Tan Keh and Dizon
17th September 1945
Argued all acts during occupation were void